Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T09:23:56.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFICACY OF RECASTS AND GESTURES ON THE ACQUISITION OF LOCATIVE PREPOSITIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2016

Kimi Nakatsukasa
Kimi Nakatsukasa*
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates whether gestures can be used during recasts to enhance the saliency of a target structure (locative prepositions) and to lead to better production of the target structure. Forty-eight low-intermediate English as a second language (ESL) students partook in communicative activities during which they received either no feedback (control), verbal recasts only (R), or recasts plus gesture (RG), and a subset of participants completed a stimulated recall session. Then the pretest, immediate, and delayed posttest scores of grammar and oral production tests were used to analyze the linguistic development. The results showed that no one commented on recasts or locative prepositions during the stimulated recall session and that there were no significant changes in grammar test scores in all conditions; however, the R and RG conditions performed significantly better in the production test than the control in the immediate posttest. Furthermore, the RG condition maintained the development in the delayed posttest, whereas the R condition did not.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 771 - 799
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alibali, M., Flevares, L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). Assessing knowledge conveyed in gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand? Journal of Educational Psychology, 23, 183–194.Google Scholar
Allen, L. Q. (1995). The effects of emblematic features on the development and access of mental representations of French expressions. Modern Language Journal, 79, 521–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, L. Q. (1999). Functions of nonverbal communication in teaching and learning a foreign language. The French Review, 72(3), 469–480.Google Scholar
Allen, L. Q. (2000). Form-meaning connections and the French causative. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 69–84.Google Scholar
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.Google Scholar
Carpenter, H., Jeon, K., MacGregor, D., & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners’ interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 209–236.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. E. (1999). Putting “input” in its proper place. Second Language Research, 15, 337–388.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1998). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle.Google Scholar
Church, R. B. (1999). Using gesture and speech to capture transitions. Cognitive Development, 14, 313–342.Google Scholar
Church, R. B., Ayman-Nolley, S., & Mahootian, S. (2004). The role of gesture in bilingual education: Does gesture enhance learning? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7, 303–319.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. A., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2009). Auditory recognition memory is inferior to visual recognition memory. Proceedings of National Academy of Science U.S.A., 106, 6008–6010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, R. L., & Otterbein, N. (1992). The mnemonic effect of speech gestures: Pantomimic and non-pantomimic gestures compared. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 113–139.Google Scholar
Cook, S. W., Yip, T. K., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing makes memories that last. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 465–475.Google Scholar
Crowder, E. M. (1996). Gestures at work in sense-making science talk. Journal of Learning Sciences, 5, 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2006). Paralinguistic focus on form. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 841–855.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. (1994). Fine-tuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners. In Alatis, J. E. (Ed.), Georgetown University roundtable on language and linguistics (pp. 96–108). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Egi, T. (2007). Recasts, learners’ interpretation, and L2 development. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 249–267). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Egi, T. (2008). Investigating stimulated recall as a cognitive measure: Reactivity and verbal reports in SLA research methodology. Language Awareness, 17, 212–217.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the role of recasts in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 576–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyereisen, P. (1998). Le rôle des gestes dans la mémorisation d’énoncés oraux. In Santi, S., Guaïtella, I., Cavé, C., & Konopczynski, G. (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité. Communication multimodale, interaction. Actes du colloque Orage 98 (pp. 355–360). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Flevares, L., & Perry, M. (2001). How many do you see? The use of nonspoken representations in first grade mathematics classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 330–345.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gass, S., Svetics, I., & Lemelin, S. (2003). Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53(3), 497–546.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283–302.Google Scholar
Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An eye for words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 483–517.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Gesture’s role in the learning process. Theory into Practice, 43, 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W., & Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20(3), 267–272.Google Scholar
Golden-Meadow, S., Kim, S., & Singer, M. A. (1999). What the teacher’s hands tell the student’s mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 720–730.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Sandhofer, C. M. (1999). Gesture conveys substantive information to ordinary listeners. Developmental Science, 2, 67–74.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Singer, M. A. (2003). From children’s hands to adults’ ears: Gesture’s role in the learning process. Developmental Psychology, 39, 509–520.Google Scholar
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 127–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2010). Methodological reflections on gesture analysis in second language acquisition and bilingualism research. Second Language Research, 26, 75–102.Google Scholar
Hama, M., & Leow, R. (2010). Learning without awareness: Revisited: Extending Williams (2005). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 465–491.Google Scholar
Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 542–572.Google Scholar
Havranek, G. (1999). The effectiveness of corrective feedback: Preliminary results of an empirical study. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 2, 189–206.Google Scholar
Holle, H., & Gunter, T. C. (2007). The role of iconic gestures in speech disambiguation: ERP evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1175–1192.Google Scholar
Hudson, N. (2011). Teacher gesture in a post-secondary English as a second language classroom: A sociocultural approach (Doctoral dissertation). University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada.Google Scholar
Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 541–577.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Odlin, T. (2000). Morphological type, spatial reference, and language transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 535–556.Google Scholar
Kamiya, N. (2015). The effectiveness of intensive and extensive recasts on L2 acquisition for implicit and explicit knowledge. Linguistics and Education, 29, 59–72.Google Scholar
Kao, R. R. (2001). Where have the prepositions gone? A study of English prepositional verbs and input enhancement in instructed SLA. IRAL, 39, 195–216.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. D., Kravitz, C., & Hopkins, M. (2004). Neural correlates of bimodal speech and gesture comprehension. Brain and Language, 89, 253–260.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. D., Ward, S., Creigh, P., & Bartolotti, J. (2007). An intentional stance modulates the integration of gesture and speech during comprehension. Brain and Language, 101, 222– 233.Google Scholar
Kim, J., & Han, Z. (2007). Recasts in communicative ESL classes: Do teacher intent and teacher interpretation overlap? In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 378–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lazaraton, A. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning, 54(1), 79–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37–63.Google Scholar
Leow, R. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware vs. unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557–584.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634–654.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. (2010). English prepositions explained (2nd ed.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Loewen, S., & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (Vol. 339–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 20, 1–67.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357–371.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183–218.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (2001). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 51, 265–301.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 321–341.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in second language acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (2013). Counterpoint piece: The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 167–184.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471–497.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., McDonough, K., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2001). Investigating learners’ reports about the L2 classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 285–308.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses and red herrings. Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–356.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59(2), 411–442.Google Scholar
Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719–758.Google Scholar
Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 459–481.Google Scholar
Peltier, I. N., & McCafferty, S. G. (2010). Gesture and identity in the teaching and learning of Italian. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17(4), 331–349.Google Scholar
Perry, M., Birch, D., & Singleton, J. (1995). Constructing shared understanding: The role of nonverbal input in learning contexts. Contemporary Legal Issues, 6, 213–235.Google Scholar
Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on “noticing the gap.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99–126.Google Scholar
Philp, J., & Mackey, A. (2010). Interaction research: What can socially informed approaches offer to cognitivists (and vice versa)? In Batstone, R. (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 210–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polio, C., & Chiu, S. (2007). Reactivity, veridicality, and language choice in L2 writing concurrent verbal protocols. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, Costa Mesa, CA.Google Scholar
Polio, C., Gass, S., & Chapin, L. (2006). Using stimulated recall to investigate speaker perceptions in native-nonnative speaker interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 237–267.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. A. (1995). Awareness and the efficacy of error correction. In Schmidt, R. (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 163–182). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283–331.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2001). Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and Memory during SLA, in Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 631–678), Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Roth, W. (2001). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71, 365–392.Google Scholar
Roth, W., & Lawless, D. V. (2002a). Signs, deixis, and the emergence of scientific explanations. Semiotica, 138, 95–130.Google Scholar
Roth, W., & Lawless, D. V. (2002b). When up is down and down is up: Body orientation, proximity, and gestures as resources. Language in Society, 31, 1–28.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. Consciousness in Second Language Learning, 11, 237–326.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In Schmidt, R. (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–66). Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in a second language (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263–300.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361–392.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2007). Corrective feedback, individual differences, and acquisition of articles. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sime, D. (2006). What do learners make of teachers’ gestures in the language classroom? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 44, 211–230.Google Scholar
Skipper, J., Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., & Small, S. (2007). Speech-associated gestures, Broca’s area, and the human mirror system. Brain and Language, 101, 260–277.Google Scholar
Slimani, A. (1992). Evaluation of classroom interaction. In Anderson, J. C. & Beretta, A. (Eds.), Evaluating second language education (pp. 197–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sueyoshi, A., & Hardison, D. (2005). The role of gestures and facial cues in second language listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55, 579–596.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, 1, 471–483.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 285–304.Google Scholar
Tellier, M. (2006). L’impact du geste pédagogique sur l’enseignement/apprentissage des langues étrangères: Etude sur des enfants de 5 ans (Doctoral dissertation). Université Paris VII, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Tellier, M. (2008). The effect of gestures on second language memorization by young children. Gesture, 8, 219–235.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183–204.Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutton, M. (2011). How speakers gesture when encoding location with English on and French sur. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3431–3454.Google Scholar
Valenzeno, L., Alibali, M., & Klatzky, R. (2003). Teachers’ gestures facilitate students’ learning: A lesson in symmetry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 187–204.Google Scholar
Wang, W. (2009). The noticing and effect of teacher feedback in ESL classrooms (Doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, USA.Google Scholar
Williams, J. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269–304.Google Scholar
Wu, Y. C., & Coulson, S. (2005). Meaningful gestures: Electrophysiological indices of iconic gesture comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42, 654–667.Google Scholar
Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learner’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 235–263.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. (2013). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 344–368.Google Scholar
Zhao, J. (2007). Metaphors and gestures for abstract concepts in academic English writing (Doctoral dissertation). University of Arizona, USA.Google Scholar