Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:39:33.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Working Memory Capacity and Mental Rotation: Evidence for a Domain-General View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Jose L. Pardo-Vazquez  and
Jose Fernandez-Rey
Jose L. Pardo-Vazquez
Affiliation:
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (Spain)
Jose Fernandez-Rey*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jose Fernandez-Rey. Grupo de Procesos Cognitivos y Conducta, Dpto. de Psicología Social, Básica y Metodología. Facultad de Psicología, Campus VIDA. 15782 Santiago de Compostela - A Coruña (Spain). Phone: +34-881813703. E-mail: jose.fernandez.rey@usc.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the existence of numerous studies that examined the relationship between working memory capacity and performance in complex cognitive tasks, it remains unclear whether this capacity is domain specific or domain general. In addition, the available empirical evidence is somewhat contradictory. In this work we have studied the role of verbal working memory capacity in a non-verbal task – mental image rotation. If this capacity were domain specific it would be expected that high and low verbal span participants would obtain similar results in the mental rotation task. We have found that this is not the case as the high span participants performed better in terms of both speed and accuracy. Moreover, these differences depended on the processing component of the mental rotation task: the higher the processing requirements the higher the differences as a function of the working memory capacity. Therefore, the evidence presented here supports the domain general hypothesis.

A pesar de la existencia de numerosos estudios que examinaron la relación entre la capacidad de memoria de trabajo y el rendimiento en tareas cognitivas complejas, no está claro si esta capacidad es específica de dominio o de dominio general. Además, la evidencia empírica disponible es algo contradictoria. En este trabajo se estudió el papel de la capacidad de la memoria de trabajo verbal en una tarea no verbal -rotación mental de imágenes-. Si esta capacidad fuese específica de dominio se esperaría que los participantes con amplitud verbal alta y baja obtuviesen resultados similares en la tarea de rotación mental. Se encontró que esto no ocurría, ya que los participantes con amplitud alta obtenían mejores res ultados en cuanto a velocidad y precisión. Por otra parte, estas diferencias dependían del componente de procesamiento de la tarea de rotación mental: cuanto mayores eran las demandas de procesamiento, mayores eran también las diferencias en función de la capacidad de memoria de trabajo. Por tanto, la evidencia que aquí se presenta apoya la hipótesis de generalidad de dominio de dicha capacidad.

Keywords

working memorymental rotationcomplex span taskmemoria de trabajorotación mentaltarea de amplitud compleja
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , November 2012 , pp. 881 - 890
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algarabel, S. (1996). Índices de interés psicolingüístico de 1.917 palabras castellanas [Psycholinguistic indexes of 1.917 Spanish words]. Cognitiva, 8, 43–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021435596321235298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade, J. (2001). Working memory in perspective. New York, NY: Pychology Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1996). The fractionation of working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 13468–13472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.24.13468CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8, 485–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0894-4105.8.4.485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaman, C. P. (2004). The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: what role for working memory capacity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 1106–1118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.1106Google ScholarPubMed
Bleckley, M. K., Durso, F. T., Crutchfield, J. M., Engle, R. W., & Khanna, M. M. (2003). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 884–889. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196548CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blinkhorn, S. F. (1999). GMA: Evaluación de grado medio y alto [GMA: Medium and Advanced Level Assessment]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.Google Scholar
Brosnan, M., Walker, I., & Collomosse, J. (2010). The effect of explicitly varying the proportion of “same” and “different” responses on sex differences in the Shepard and Metzler mental rotation task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 172–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440902743710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumback, C. R., Low, K. A., Gratton, G., & Fabiani, M. (2005). Putting things into perspective: Individual differences in working-memory span and the integration of information. Experimental Psychology, 52, 21–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.1.21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capon, A., Handley, S., & Dennis, I. (2003). Working memory and reasoning:An individual differences perspective. Thinking & Reasoning, 9, 203–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546781343000222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colom, R., Rebollo, I.,Abad, F. J., & Shih, P. C. (2006). Complex span tasks, simple span tasks, and cognitive abilities: A reanalysis of key studies. Memory & Cognition, 34, 158–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colom, R., & Shih, P. C. (2004). Is working memory fractionated onto different components of intelligence? Intelligence, 32, 431–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.06.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, A. R., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 331–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway, A. R., & Engle, R. W. (1996). Individual differences in working memory capacity: More evidence for a general capacity theory. Memory, 4, 577–590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/741940997CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1973). The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus. Memory & Cognition, 1, 246–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03198104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Neys, W., D'Ydewalle, G., Schaeken, W., & Vos, G. (2002). A Dutch, computerized, and group administrable adaptation of the operation span test. Psychologica Belgica, 42, 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 972–992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.18.5.972Google ScholarPubMed
Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In Ross, B. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 44, pp. 145–199). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.128.3.309CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hambrick, D. Z., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2005). The role of working memory in higher-level cognition: Domain-specific versus domain-general perspectives. In Sternberg, R. J. & Pretz, J. E. (Eds.), Cognition and intelligence: Identifying the mechanisms of the mind (pp. 104–121). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyun, J. S., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Visual working memory as the substrate for mental rotation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 154–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194043CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarrold, C., & Towse, J. N. (2006). Individual differences in working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 39–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems:Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychological Review, 92, 137–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.92.2.137CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 130, 169–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R., Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In Conway, A. R., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. N. (Eds.), Variation in working memory. New York, NY: Oxford.Google Scholar
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 336–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.26.2.336Google ScholarPubMed
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35, 211–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohman, D. F. (1986). The effect of speed-accuracy tradeoff on sex differences in mental rotation. Perception and Psychophysics, 39, 427–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03207071CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, D. L., & Prat, C. S. (2002). Working memory and stroop interference: An individual differences investigation. Memory & Cognition, 30, 294–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195290CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 621–640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.130.4.621CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberauer, K., Süß, H. M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittman, W. W. (2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31, 167–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00115-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberauer, K., Süß, H. M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittman, W. W. (2004). Corrigendum to “The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination”. Intelligence, 32, 429–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo-Vazquez, J. L., & Fernandez-Rey, J. (2008). External validation of the computerized, group administrable adaptation of the “operation span task”. Behavioral Research Methods, 40, 46–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.125.1.4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turley-Ames, K. J., & Whitfield, M. M. (2003). Strategy training and working memory task performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 446–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00095-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar