Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T10:10:48.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nursing Motives for Helping Scale (N-MHS): Reliability and Validity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

José Luis González Gutiérrez*
Affiliation:
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Cecilia Peñacoba Puente
Affiliation:
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Ricardo Moreno Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Almudena López López
Affiliation:
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Lilian Velasco Furlong
Affiliation:
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Dr. José Luis González Gutiérrez. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Avda. Atenas s/n, 28922 Alcorcón (Madrid), Spain. Fax: 34 91 4888956. E-mail: joseluis.gonzalez@urjc.es

Abstract

This paper presents the Nursing Motives for Helping Scale (N-MHS), an instrument designed for the evaluation of three of the four motives for helping derived from Batson's helping pathway theory. Dimensionality was analyzed by means of principal component analysis (n = 113), followed by confirmatory factor analysis. A 3-factor structure (corresponding to Batson's differentiation among altruistic motivation, reward-seeking motivation, and punishment-avoidance motivation, respectively), with 9 items distributed in three latent variables, revealed an acceptable fit to the data. Alpha values (.60 - .74) showed that internal consistency was acceptable for a newly developed subscale with a small number of items. Convergence validity was evaluated with correlations between N-MHS subscales scores and scores on the Professional Expectations Scale (Garrosa, Moreno-Jiménez, Rodríguez-Carvajal, & Morante, 2005). The three resulting subscales are a promising instrument for the evaluation of three nursing motives for helping that can contribute to reduce the potential risks and to improve the potential benefits both for the nurse and the patient.

En este articulo se presenta la Escala de Motivaciones de Ayuda en Enfermería [The Nursing Motives for Helping Scale (N-MHS)], un instrumento elaborado para evaluar tres de las cuatro motivaciones de ayuda derivadas del modelo de motivación prosocial de Batson. Se analizó la dimensionalidad mediante análisis de componentes principales (n = 113), seguido de análisis factorial confirmatorio. La estructura de 3 factores (correspondiendo a la diferenciación de Batson entre las motivaciones altruista, la de búsqueda de recompensa y la de evitación del castigo, respectivamente), con 9 ítems distribuidos en 3 variables latentes, mostró un ajuste aceptable a los datos. Los valores de alfa (.60 - .74) indicaron que la consistencia interna era aceptable para una subescala nueva con un número pequeño de ítems. La validez convergente se evaluó mediante las correlaciones entre las puntuaciones de las subescalas de la N-MHS y las puntuaciones en la Escala de Expectativas Profesionales (Garrosa, Moreno-Jiménez, Rodríguez-Carvajal y Morante, 2005). Las tres subescalas resultantes constituyen un instrumento prometedor para la evaluación de tres motivaciones de ayuda de enfermería que pueden contribuir a reducir los riesgos y a incrementar los beneficios potenciales tanto de los profesionales de enfermería como de los pacientes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguilar, M.C., García, M.A., & Calvo, A. (2004). Valores hacia el trabajo del personal de enfermería. Un análisis descriptivo. Index de Enfermería, 44–45, 913.Google Scholar
Arbuckle, J.L. (2003a). Amos 5.0 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: SPSS.Google Scholar
Arbuckle, J.L. (2003b). Amos 5.0 update to the Amos user's guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.Google Scholar
Archer, R.L. (1984). The farmer and the cowman should be friends. An attempt at reconciliation with Batson, Coke and Pych. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 709711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, R.L., Diaz-Loving, R., Gollwitzer, P.M., Davis, M.H., & Foushee, H.C. (1981). The role of dispositional empathy and social evaluation in the empathic mediation of helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 786796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C.D. (1991). The Altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Batson, C.D. (1993). A scientific explanation of why we help one another. Lawrence, KS: University Press.Google Scholar
Batson, C.D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In Gilbert, D.T.Fiske, S.T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th Ed., Vol. 2, pp. 282315). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Batson, C.D., Ahmad, N., Lishner, D.A., & Tsang, J.A. (2002). Empathy and altruism. In Snyder, C.R. & Lopez, S.J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 485498). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Batson, C.D., Bolen, M.H., Cross, J.A., & Neuringer-Benefiel, H.E. (1986). Where is the altruism in the altruistic personality? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 212220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C.D., & Coke, J.S. (1981). Empathy: A source of altruistic motivation for helping? In Rushton, J.P., & Sorrentino, R.M. (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior: Social, personality, and developmental perspectives (pp.167187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Batson, C.D., & Oleson, K.C. (1991). Current status of the empathy-altruism hypothesis. In Clark, M.S. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 6285). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, L., & Daniels, L.R. (1964). Affecting the salience of the social responsibility norm. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 275281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkowitz, L., & Lutterman, K.G. (1968). The traditional socially responsible personality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32, 169185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierhoff, H.W., & Rohmann, E. (2004). Altruistic personality in the context of the empathy-altruism hypothesis. European Journal of Personality, 18, 351365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, K.A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 256259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., Troyer, D., Switxer, G., & Speer, A.L. (1991). The altruistic personality: In what contexts is it apparent? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 450458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, R.B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chacón, F., & Vecina, M.L. (1999). Análisis de la fiabilidad de un cuestionario de motivaciones del voluntariado en sida. Psicothema, 11, 211223.Google Scholar
Chacón, F., Vecina, M.L., Menard, M., & Sanz, M. (1997). Factores psicosociales que influyen en el voluntariado: Un estudio piloto. Intervención Psicosocial, 17, 105116.Google Scholar
Chin, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295336). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R.B., Brown, S.L., Lewis, B.P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S.L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cialdini, R.B., Schaller, M., Houlihan, D., Arps, K., Fultz, J., & Beaman, A. (1987). Empathy-based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 749758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clary, E.G., & Snyder, M. (1991). A functional analysis of altruism and prosocial behavior: The case of volunteerism. In Clark, M.S. (Ed.), Prosocial behavior (pp. 119148). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Clary, E.G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R.D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A.A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P.K. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 15161530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colby, A., & Damon, W. (1992). Some do care: Contemporary lives of moral commitment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Crocher, L., & Aligna, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Crowley, S., & Xitao, F. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 508531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVillis, R.F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J.F., & Penner, L.A. (2004). Helping and altruism. In Brewer, M.B., & Hewston, M. (Eds.), Emotion and motivation. Perspectives in social psychology (pp. 247280). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N. (1991). Meta-analytic contributions to the literature on prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 273282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrosa, E., Moreno-Jiménez, E., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., & Morante, M.E. (2005). Variables predictoras del burnout en enfermería: importancia de los procesos emocionales de resistencia. Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo, 51, 513.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D.T., & Silveira, D.H. (1996). Overhelping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 678690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hoyle, R.H. (Ed.). (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Meier, S. (1983). Toward a theory of burnout. Human Relations, 36, 899910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchinsky, P.M. (2000). Psychology applied to work. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Mueller, R.O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Oliner, S., & Oliner, P. (1988). The altruistic personality: Rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Omoto, A.M., & Snyder, M. (1990). Basic research in action: Volunteerism and society's response to AIDS. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 152166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omoto, A.M., & Snyder, M. (1995). Sustained helping without obligation: Motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 671686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penner, L.A., Fritzsche, B.A., Craiger, J.P., & Freifeld, T. (1995). Measuring the prosocial personality. In Butcher, J.N., & Spielberger, C.D., (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Piliavin, J.A., & Charng, H.W. (1990). Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. The Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 2765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, J. (2001). Understanding motivation and emotion (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Romer, D., Gruder, C.L., & Lizzadro, T. (1986). A person-situation approach to altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 10011012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, J.P. (1980). Altruism, socialization, and society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Rushton, J.P. (1981). The altruistic personality. In Rushton, J.P., & Sorrentino, R.M. (Eds.), Altruism and helping behaviour: Social, personality, and developmental perspectives (pp. 251266). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schaller, M., & Cialdini, R.B. (1988). The economics of empathic helping: Support for a mood management motive. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 163181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S.H. (1968). Words, deeds, and the perception of consequences and responsibility in action situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 232242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical test in 20 countries. In Zanna, M.P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (vol. 25, pp. 165). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segars, A.H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17, 517525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K.D., Keating, J.P., & Stotland, E. (1989). Altruism reconsidered: The effect of denying feedback on a victim's status to empathic witnesses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 641650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.E., Kleinbeck, S.V., Boyle, D., Kochinda, C., & Parker, S. (2001). Family Caregivers' Motives for Helping Scale derived from motivation-to-help theory. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 9, 239257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staub, E. (1974). Helping a distressed person: Social, personality and stimulus determinants. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 7, pp. 293341). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. (1995). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Taylor, R., Ford, G., & Dunbar, M. (1995). The effects of caring on health: A community-based longitudinal study. Social Science and Medicine, 40, 14071415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toi, M., & Batson, C.D. (1982). More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 281292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, J.B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (4th Ed., pp. 653771). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Zeller, R.A., & Carmines, E.G. (1980). Measurement in the social sciences: The link between theory and data. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar