Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-pl66f Total loading time: 0.252 Render date: 2021-09-21T22:00:16.704Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Spanish Version of the Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire 30 (MCQ-30)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2013

Juan Ramos-Cejudo*
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
José M. Salguero
Affiliation:
Universidad de Málaga (Spain)
Antonio Cano-Vindel
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
*Corresponding
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Juan Ramos-Cejudo. Department of Personality. Evaluation and Psychological Treatment II (Differential Psychology). School of Psychology. Universidad Complutense. Campus de Somosaguas. 28223 Madrid (Spain). Email: juanramoscejudo@psi.ucm.es

Abstract

The Meta-cognitions Questionnaire 30 (MCQ-30; Wells & Cartwright-Hatton, 2004) has been used to assess individual differences in metacognitive beliefs considered to be central in the metacognitive theory of generalized anxiety disorder (Wells, 2005). In the present study, the psychometric properties, reliability, and validity of a Spanish adaptation of the MCQ-30 were tested in a broad sample of participants (N = 768) of Spanish nationality aged 16–81 years (31.1% males, 68.9% females). Confirmatory factor analysis showed the expected five-factor structure, which was found to be invariant across gender. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the subscales were adequate, and the expected relationships to theoretically related variables such as pathological worry, meta-worry, thought suppression and trait anxiety were obtained. Convergent validity with other measures of beliefs about worry was also found. Taken together, these findings suggest that the Spanish version of the MCQ-30 is a valid instrument for evaluating metacognitive beliefs in the Spanish-speaking population.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barahmand, U. (2009). Meta-cognitive profiles in anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Research, 169, 240243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.06.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behar, E., DiMarco, I. D., Hekler, E. B., Mohlman, J., & Staples, A. M. (2009). Current theoretical models of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD): Conceptual review and treatment implications. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 10111023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS: Structural equations programs. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
Brett, C. M. C., Johns, L. C., Peters, E. P., & McGuire, P. K. (2009). The role of metacognitive beliefs in determining the impact of anomalous experiences: A comparison of help-seeking and non-help-seeking groups of people experiencing psychotic-like anomalies. Psychological Medicine, 39, 939950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291708004650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright-Hatton, S., & Wells, A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The meta-cognitions questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 279296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6185(97)00011-X CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Davis, R. N., & Valentiner, D. P. (2000). Does meta-cognitive theory enhance our understanding of pathological worry and anxiety? Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 513526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00211-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, B. P., Extremera, N., & Ramos, N. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the White Bear Suppression Inventory. Psychological Report, 94, 782784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, P. L., & Wells, A. (2008). Metacognitive therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A case series. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 39, 117132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.12.001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeston, M. H., Rhéaume, J., Letarte, H., Dugas, M. J., & Ladouceur, R. (1994). Why do people worry? Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 791802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90048-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, M., Bethencourt, J. M., Fumero, A., & Fernández, A. (2006). Adaptación española del cuestionario ¿Por qué preocuparse? [Spanish adaptation of the “Why worry?” questionnaire]. Psicothema, 18, 313318.Google Scholar
Holeva, V., & Tarrier, N. (2001). Personality and peritraumatic dissociation in the prediction of PTSD in victims of road traffic accidents. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 51, 687692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00256-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, L., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure-analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.2.351 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janeck, A. S., Calamari, J. E., Riemann, B. C., & Heffelfinger, S. K. (2003). Too much thinking about thinking?: Metacognitive differences in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 17, 181195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00198-6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maher-Edwards, L., Fernie, B. A., Murphy, G., Wells, A., & Spada, M. M. (2011). Metacognitions and negative emotions as predictors of symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 70, 311317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.09.016 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molina, S., & Borkovec, T. D. (1994). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and associated characteristics. In G. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 265–283). New York, NY: Wiley.
Nuevo, R., Montorio, I., & Ruiz, M. A. (2002). Applicability of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in an older adult population. Ansiedad y Estrés, 8, 157172.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3 rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schweizer, K. (2010). Some guidelines concerning the modelling of traits and abilities in test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, M. M., Mohiyeddini, C., & Wells, A. (2008). Measuring metacognitions associated with emotional distress: Factor structure and predictive validity of the metacognitions questionnaire 30. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 238242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, M. M., Moneta, G. B., & Wells, A. (2007). The relative contribution of metacognitive beliefs and expectancies to drinking behavior. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 42, 567574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agm055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. (1983). State-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Luschene, R. E. (1982). Cuestionario de Ansiedad Estado-Rasgo. [The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory] . Madrid, Spain: TEA ediciones.Google Scholar
Tallis, F., Davey, G. C. L., & Capuzzo, N. (1994). The phenomenology of non-pathological worry: A preliminary investigation. In Davey, G. C. L. & Tallis, F, (Eds.), Worrying: perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 6189). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tosun, A., & Irak, M. (2008). Adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 for the Turkish population, and its relationship to anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 19, 6780.Google Scholar
Typaldou, M., Nidos, A., Roxanis, I., Dokianaki, F., Vaidakis, N., & Papadimitriou, G. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) in a Greek sample. Annals of General Psychiatry, 9, 103110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-9-S1-S103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, A. (1995). Meta-cognition and worry: A cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 301320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465800015897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, A. (1999). A cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavior Modification, 23, 526555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0145445599234002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders & metacognition: Innovative cognitive therapy. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wells, A. (2005). The metacognitive model of GAD: Assessment of meta-worry and relationship with DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 107121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-1652-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, A., & Carter, K. (2001). Further tests of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder: Metacognitions and worry in GAD, panic disorder, social phobia, depression and nonpatients. Behavior Therapy, 32, 85102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(01)80045-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: Properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 385396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00147-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M., & Zanakos, S. (1994). Chronic thought suppression, Journal of Personality, 62, 615640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00311.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Spanish Version of the Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire 30 (MCQ-30)
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Spanish Version of the Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire 30 (MCQ-30)
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Spanish Version of the Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire 30 (MCQ-30)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *