Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:21:42.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement Invariance of the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire across Different Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2014

Guido Alessandri ,
Corrado Fagnani ,
Giancarlo Di Gennaro ,
Giulio Nicolò Meldolesi ,
Paolo Pasquini ,
Emanuele Caroppo ,
Giovanni Martinotti ,
Alessandro Toni ,
Elisa Fabi  and
Angelo Picardi
Guido Alessandri*
Affiliation:
Sapienza Università di Roma (Italy)
Corrado Fagnani
Affiliation:
Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Italy)
Giancarlo Di Gennaro
Affiliation:
Unità di chirurgia dell’epilessia (Italy)
Giulio Nicolò Meldolesi
Affiliation:
Unità di chirurgia dell’epilessia (Italy)
Paolo Pasquini
Affiliation:
Istituto Dermatologico IDI-IRCCS (Italy)
Emanuele Caroppo
Affiliation:
RM-B Azienda Sanitaria Locale (Italy)
Giovanni Martinotti
Affiliation:
Università “G. d’ Annunzio” (Italy)
Alessandro Toni
Affiliation:
Sapienza Università di Roma (Italy)
Elisa Fabi
Affiliation:
Sapienza Università di Roma (Italy)
Angelo Picardi
Affiliation:
Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Italy)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Guido Alessandri. Assistant Professor. Sapienza Università di Roma. Department of Psychology. Via dei Marsi, 78. 00185. Roma (Italy). Phone: +39–0644427535. E-mail:guido.alessandri@uniroma1.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The measurement invariance of the Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) questionnaire was investigated across four samples of non-clinical subjects (N = 222), dermatological patients (N = 458), psychiatric inpatients (N = 156), and patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (N = 101). The results provided evidence of configural, metric, and scalar invariance across groups. Overall, our findings provide further support to the reliability and validity of the ECR.

Keywords

ECRattachmentanxietyavoidancemeasurement invariance
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 17 , 2014 , E22
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Alonso-Arbiol, I., Balluerka, N., Shaver, P. R., & Gillath, O. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Spanish and American versions of the ECR adult attachment questionnaire: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 9–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.1.9 Google Scholar
Atkinson, L., & Zucker, K. J. (1987). Attachment and psychopathology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, K., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Methods of assessing adult attachment: Do they converge? In Simpson, J. A. & Rholes, W. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 25–45). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238 Google Scholar
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Basic.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1973). Separation: Anxiety and anger. London, UK: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1980). Loss, sadness and depression. London, UK: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In Simpson, J. A. & Rholes, W. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Browne, M. W., & Cudek, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA, Sage.Google Scholar
Cameron, J. J., Finnegan, H., & Morry, M. M. (2012). Orthogonal dreams in an oblique world: A meta-analysis of the association between attachment anxiety and avoidance. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 472–476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.05.001 Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 nd Ed.). Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Conradi, H. J., & de Jonge, P. (2009). Recurrent depression and the role of adult attachment: A prospective and a retrospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 116, 93–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.027 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, D. W. (1987). Construct invalidity comes from method effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 285–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164487472001 Google Scholar
George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1985). Adult Attachment Interview. Unpublished manuscript. University of California, Berkeley Google Scholar
Gillath, O., Shaver, P. R., Baek, J. M., & Chun, D. S. (2008). Genetic correlates of adult attachment style. Personality and Social psychology Bulletin, 34, 1396–1405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167208321484 Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Google Scholar
Jankovic, S., Raznatovic, M., Marinkovic, J., Maksimovic, N., Jankovic, J., & Djicanovic, B. (2009). Relevance of psychosomatic factors in psoriasis: A case-control study. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 89, 364–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-0669 Google Scholar
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1 Google Scholar
Mallinckrodt, B., & Wei, M. (2005). Attachment, social competencies, social support, and psychological distress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 358–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.358 Google Scholar
Marazziti, D., Mandillo, S., Di Pietro, C., Golini, E., Matteoni, R., & Tocchini-Valentini, G. P. (2007). GPR37 associates with the dopamine transporter to modulate dopamine uptake and behavioral responses to dopaminergic drugs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 9846–9851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703368104 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H., & Hough, L. (2010). Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 450–470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019216 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, W., & Teresi, J. (2006). An essay on measurement and factorial invariance. Medical Care, 44, 69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245438.73837.89 Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Sapir-Lavid, Y., & Avihou-Kanza, N. (2009). What’s inside the minds of securely and insecurely attached people? The secure-base script and its associations with attachment-style dimensions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 615–633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015649 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 179–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormel, J., Koester, M. W. J., & van den Brink, W. (1989). Measuring change with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). The problem of retest effects. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 24, 227–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01788963 Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.46.3.598 Google Scholar
Picardi, A., Caroppo, E., Toni, A., Bitetti, D., & Di Maria, G. (2005). Stability of attachment-related anxiety and avoidance and their relationships with the five-factor model and the psychobiological model of personality. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 78, 327–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/147608305X26882 Google Scholar
Picardi, A., Di Gennaro, G., Meldolesi, G. N., Grammaldo, L. G., Esposito, V., & Quarato, P. P. (2007), Partial seizures due to sclerosis of the right amygdala presenting as panic disorder. Psychopathology, 40, 178–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000100365 Google Scholar
Picardi, A., Vermigli, P., Toni, A., D’Amico, R., Bitetti, D., & Pasquini, P. (2002). Il questionario «Experiences in Close Relationships» (ECR) per la valutazione dell’attaccamento negli adulti [The «Experiences in Close Relationships» (ECR) questionnaire to evaluate attachment styles in adults]. Giornale Italiano di Psicopatologia, 8, 282–294.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 Google Scholar
Quarato, P. P., Di Gennaro, G., Mascia, A., Grammaldo, L. G., Meldolesi, G. N., Picardi, A., ..., Esposito, V. (2005). Temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: different surgical strategies after a non-invasive diagnostic protocol. Journal of Neurological Neurosurgery Psychiatry, 76, 815–824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2004.044016 Google Scholar
Sanchez-Gistau, V., Pintor, L., Sugranyes, G., Baillés, E., Carreño, M., Donaire, A., … Rumia, J. (2010). Prevalence of interictal psychiatric disorders in patients with refractory temporal and extratemporal lobe epilepsy in Spain. A comparative study. Epilepsia, 51, 1309–1313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02464.x Google Scholar
Swinkels, W. A., Kuyk, J., van Dyck, R., & Spinhoven, P. (2005). Psychiatric comorbidity in epilepsy. Epilepsy and Behavior, 7, 37–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.04.012 Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002 Google Scholar
Weems, C. F., Berman, S. L., Silverman, W. K., & Rodriguez, E. T. (2002). The relation between anxiety sensitivity and attachment style in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 24, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, M., Heppner, P. P., & Mallinckrodt, B. (2003). Perceived coping as a mediator between attachment and psychological distress: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 438–447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.50.4.438 Google Scholar
Weijters, B. (2006). Response styles in consumer research. Leuven, Belgium: Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.Google Scholar
Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 462–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.74.3.462 Google Scholar