Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-5kt27 Total loading time: 0.168 Render date: 2021-09-28T08:16:57.258Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Theories of Militancy in Practice

Explanations of Muslim Terrorism in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Abstract

This article analyzes the interaction between theories of radicalization and state responses to militancy in India. Focusing on the interpretation of the increased frequency of terrorist attacks in Indian metropolises in the last decade, the article examines the narratives surrounding those classified as terrorists in the context of rising Muslim militancy in the country. Different state agencies operate with different theories about the links between processes of radicalization and terrorist violence. The scenarios of radicalization underlying legislative efforts to prevent terrorism, the construction of motives by the police, and the interpretation of violence by the judiciary all rely on assumptions about radicalization and violence. Such narratives are used to explain terrorism both to security agencies and to the public; they inform the categories and scenarios of prevention. Prevention relies on detection of future deeds, planning, intentions, and even potential intentions. “Detection” of potential intentions relies on assumptions about specific dispositions. Identification of such dispositions in turn relies on the context-specific theories of the causes of militancy. These determine what “characteristics” of individuals or groups indicate potential threats and form the basis for their categorization as “potentially dangerous.” The article explores the cultural contexts of theories of radicalization, focusing on how they are framed by societal understandings of the causes of deviance and the relation between the individual and society emerging in contemporary India. It examines the shift in the perception of threat and the categories of “dangerous others” from a focus on role to a focus on ascriptive identity.

Type
Special Section: Cultures of Radicalization: Discourse and Practices of Political Violence and Terrorism
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnes, F. (2005) “Citizenship and identity in post 9/11 nations,” in Fitz, A. Kröger, M. Schneider, A. Wenner, D. (eds.) Import Export: Cultural Transfer; India, Germany, Austria. Berlin: Parthas: 18288.Google Scholar
Andersen, W. K. Damle, S. D. (1987) The Brotherhood in Saffron: The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu Revivalism. New Delhi: Vistaar.Google Scholar
Asad, T. (2007) On Suicide Bombing. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
Basu, T. Datta, P. Sarkar, S. Sarkar, T. Sen, S. (1993) Khaki Shorts and Saffron Flags: A Critique of the Hindu Right. New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Baxi, P. (n.d.) “’Mock trial’: Law, violence, and governance in the aftermath of Gujarat, 2002.” Manuscript on file with the author.Google Scholar
Bhaumik, S. Desai, D. (2005) “The coach, the bogey.” Outlook, January 31, www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?226359.Google Scholar
Bhujpal, Chhagan (2003) “I won’t blame the police.” Interview, Mid Day, March 15.Google Scholar
Bidwai, P. (2004) “The BJP’s new stunt.” News International, August 26.Google Scholar
Bigo, D. (2002) “Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease.” Alternatives (27): 6392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chellaney, B. (2001–2) “Fighting terrorism in Southern Asia: The lessons of history.” International Security 26 (3): 94116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Communalism Combat (2002) “Genocide Gujarat 2002,” in Dayal, J. (ed.) Gujarat 2002: Untold and Re-told Stories of the Hindutva Lab. Delhi: Media House: 425681.Google Scholar
Daud, S. M. Suresh, H. (1993) The People’s Verdict: An Inquiry into the December 92 and January 93 Riots in Bombay. Mumbai: Indian People’s Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
Dhavan, R. (n.d.) “Riots as murder: Re-examining the Best Bakery case,” www.sabrang.com/spaper/rajivdhavan.pdf (accessed January 31, 2008).Google Scholar
Diwanji, A. K. (2003) “Mumbai twin blasts case solved: Police,” September 1, www.rediff.com/news/2003/sep/01blast2.htm.Google Scholar
Eckert, J. (1999) “Riots: That’s Something That Happens in the Slums”: Land, städtische Unruhen und die Politik der Segregation. Berlin: Das Arabische Buch.Google Scholar
Eckert, J. (2003a) The Charisma of Direct Action: Power, Politics, and the Shiv Sena. Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, J. (2003b) “Rache und nation.” Berliner Debatte Initial 14 (3): 2836.Google Scholar
Eckert, J. (2005) “Indisches Oxymoron: Rechtsstaat ohne Rule of Law,” in Kappel, R. Tobler, H. W. Waldmann, P. (eds.) Rechtstaatlichkeit im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. Freiburg: Rombach: 34174.Google Scholar
Eckert, J. (2008a) “Creating Hindustan: Violence and religion in Hindunationalist mobilisation.” Working paper of the Robert Schuman Centre, European University Institute.Google Scholar
Eckert, J. (2008b) “Laws for enemies,” in Eckert, J. (ed.) The Social Life of Anti-terrorism Laws. Bielefeld: transcript: 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekta Samiti (1993) Bombay’s Shame: A Report on Bombay Riots. Mumbai: Ekta Samiti.Google Scholar
Engineer, A. A. (1996) “Communal violence and the role of enforcement agencies,” in Bidwai, P. Mukhia, H. Vanaik, A. (eds.) Religion, Religiosity, and Communalism. New Delhi: Manohar: 12742.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Garland, D. Sparks, R. (2000) “Criminology, social theory, and the challenges of our times.” British Journal of Criminology 40 (2): 189204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatade, S. (2006) “Spot the difference! Bajrang Dal and Lashkar-e-Toiba.” Communalism Watch, June 2, communalism.blogspot.com/2006/06/spot-difference-bajarang-dal-and.html.Google Scholar
Gatade, S. (2008) “Terrorism’s new signature: Enter Hindutva terrorists.” Mainstream 46 (6), www.mainstreamweekly.net/article521.html (accessed April 17, 2012).Google Scholar
Hansen, T. B. (1999) The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, T. (2008) “Liberalism versus terrorism: Warfare, crime control, and the United States after 11 September,” in Eckert, J. (ed.) The Social Life of Anti-terrorism Laws. Bielefeld: transcript: 3354.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2002) “’We have no orders to save you’: State participation and complicity in communal violence in Gujarat,” in Dayal, J. (ed.) Gujarat 2002: Untold and Re-told Stories of the Hindutva Lab. Delhi: Media House: 345424.Google Scholar
Inden, R. (1990) Imagining India. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jaffrelot, C. (1996) The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics, 1925 to the 1990s. New Delhi: Viking.Google Scholar
Jalal, A. (1994) The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League, and the Demand for Pakistan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jayal, N. G. (2001) Democracy and the State. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalhan, A. (2006) “Colonial continuities: Human rights, terrorism, and security laws in India.” Columbia Journal of Asian Law 20 (1): 93234. (Also available as Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 970503, ssrn.com/abstract=970503.)Google Scholar
Kothari, Miloon Contractor, Nasreen (1996) Planned Segregation: Riots, Evictions, and Dispossession in Jogeshwari East, Mumbai/Bombay, India. Mumbai: Youth for Unity and Voluntary Action.Google Scholar
Krishnan, J. (2004) “India’s ’Patriot Act’: POTA and the impact on civil liberties in the world’s largest democracy.” Law and Inequality 22 (2): 265300.Google Scholar
Laqueur, W. (2000) The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lepsius, O. (2004) “Freiheit, Sicherheit und Terror: Die Rechtslage in Deutschland.” Leviathan 32 (1): 6488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludden, D., ed. (1997) Making India Hindu: Religion, Community, and the Politics of Democracy in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahmood, C. (2001) “Terrorism, myth, and the power of ethnographic praxis.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 30 (5): 52045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamdani, M. (2004) Good Muslim, Bad Muslim. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Mid Day (2003) “Mantralaye, gateway on the list.” May 4.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. (2004) “The origins of the new terrorism.” Parameters 34 (1): 2943.Google Scholar
Muralidharan, S. (2004) “Untold stories.” Frontline, March 27–April 9, www.frontline.in/fl2107/stories/20040409001704400.htm.Google Scholar
Nagaraj, V. (2003) “India: The politics of anti-terror legislation.” Paper presented at the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative Seminar “Human Rights and Anti-terrorism Legislation in the Commonwealth,” London, June 5–6.Google Scholar
Padgaonkar, D., ed. (1993) When Bombay Burned. New Delhi: UBS.Google Scholar
Parliament of India (2002) Joint Sitting of the Houses of Parliament, Synopsis of Debates, Tuesday March 26/Chaitra 5, 1924 (Saka), parliamentofindia.nic.in/lsdeb/ls13/ses9/260302.html.Google Scholar
People’s Tribunal (2004) People’s Tribunal on the Prevention of Terrorist Act (POTA) and Other Security Legislation. Delhi: Indian Social Institute.Google Scholar
Peoples Union for Democratic Rights (1993) Lawless Roads: A Report on TADA, 1985–1993. Delhi: Peoples Union for Democratic Rights.Google Scholar
POTA (2002) Prevention of Terrorist Activities Act, Statement of Objects and Reasons, www.naavi.org/importantlaws/pota/pota_sch.htm (accessed March 9, 2004).Google Scholar
Pramanik, P. (2006) “Mumbai’s Dirty Harrys back in action.” Hindustan Times, July 24.Google Scholar
Randeria, S. (1996) “Hindu-Fundamentalismus: Zum Verhältnis von Religion, Politik und Geschichte im modernen Indien,” in Elwert, G. Jensen, J. Kortt, I. R. (eds.) Kulturen und Innovationen: Festschrift für Wolfgang Rudolph. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot: 33361.Google Scholar
Rediff (2005) “Godhra train fire accidental: Report,” Rediff.com, January 17, www.rediff.com/news/2005/jan/17godhra.htm.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S. (1997) “Indian nationalism and the politics of Hindutva,” in Ludden, D. (ed.) Making India Hindu: Religion, Community, and the Politics of Democracy in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press: 27093.Google Scholar
Seerwai, H. M. (1990) Partition of India: Legend and Reality. Mumbai: Emmenem.Google Scholar
Sharma, K. (1995) “Chronicle of a riot foretold,” in Patel, S. Thorner, A. (eds.) Bombay: Metaphor for Modern India. Mumbai: Oxford University Press: 26886.Google Scholar
Shourie, A. (1993) A Secular Agenda. New Delhi: ASA.Google Scholar
Singh, U. K. (2003) “Democratic dilemmas: Can democracies do without extraordinary laws?Economic and Political Weekly, February 1–7.Google Scholar
Singh, U. K. (2007) The State, Democracy, and Anti-terror Laws in India. Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
South Asia Terrorism Portal (n.d.) “Terrorist attacks outside Jammu and Kashmir and Northeast since 2000,” satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/database/OR_9-11_majorterroristattacks.htm (accessed July 7, 2008).Google Scholar
Srikrishna Commission (1998) Srikrishna Commission Report. Mumbai: Jyoti Punwani, Vrijendra.Google Scholar
Thapar, R. (1985) “Syndicated Moksha?Seminar (313): 1422.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (2004) “Terror, terrorism, terrorists.” Sociological Theory 22 (1): 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varadarajan, S. (2005) “The truth about Godhra.” The Hindu, January 23, 2005.Google Scholar
Venkatesan, J. (2004a) “POTA reinvented.” Frontline, October 23–November 5, www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2122/stories/20041105004811000.htm.Google Scholar
Venkatesan, J. (2004b) “A reality check.” Frontline, July 31, www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2116/stories/20040813000708000.htm.Google Scholar
Yadav, Y. (2000) “Understanding the second democratic upsurge: Trends of Bahujan participation in electoral politics in the 1990s,” in Fraenkel, F. Hassan, Z. Bhargava, R. Arora, B. (eds.) Transforming India: Social and Political Dynamics of Democracy. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Theories of Militancy in Practice
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Theories of Militancy in Practice
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Theories of Militancy in Practice
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *