Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-xr9nb Total loading time: 0.267 Render date: 2021-09-17T11:34:29.522Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Railroad Integration and Uneven Development on the European Periphery, 1870–1910

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2021

Eduard J. Alvarez-Palau*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Alfonso Díez-Minguela
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics, Universitat de València, València, Spain
Jordi Martí-Henneberg
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Sociology, Universitat de Lleida, Lleida, Spain
*Corresponding

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between railroad integration and regional development on the European periphery between 1870 and 1910, based on a regional data set including 291 spatial units. Railroad integration is proxied by railroad density, while per capita GDP is used as an indicator of economic development. The period under study is of particular relevance as it has been associated with the second wave of railroad construction in Europe and also coincides with the industrialization of most of the continent. Overall, we found that railroads had a significant and positive impact on the growth of per capita GDP across Europe. The magnitude of this relationship appears to be relatively modest, but the results obtained are robust with respect to a number of different specifications. From a geographical perspective, we found that railroads had a significantly greater influence on regions located in countries on the northern periphery of Europe than in other outlying areas. They also helped the economies of these areas to begin the process of catching up with the continent’s industrialized core. In contrast, the regions on the southern periphery showed lower levels of economic growth, with this exacerbating the preexisting divergence in economic development. The expansion of the railroad network in them was unable to homogenize the diffusion of economic development and tended to further benefit the regions that were already industrialized. In most of the cases, the capital effect was magnified, and this contributed to the consolidation of newly created nation-states.

Type
Special Issue Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Social Science History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. C. (2009) The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Palau, E. J., Franch, X., and Martí-Henneberg, J. (2013) “Evolution of the territorial coverage of the railway network and its influence on population growth.Historical Methods 46 (3): 175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atack, J., Fred Bateman, M. Haines, and Margo, R. (2010) “Did railroads induce or follow economic growth? Urbanization and population growth in the American Midwest, 1850–1860.Social Science History 34 (2): 171–97.Google Scholar
Atack, J., Haines, M., and Margo, R. (2011) “Railroads and the rise of the factory: Evidence for the United States, 1850–70,” in Rhode, P., Rosenbloom, J., and Weiman, D. (eds.) Economic Evolution and Revolutions in Historical Time. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Atack, J., and Margo, R. (2011) “The impact of access to rail transportation on agricultural improvement: The American Midwest as a test case, 1850–1860.Journal of Transportation and Land Use 4 (2): 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badia-Miro, M., Guilera, J., and Lains, P. (2012) “Reconstruction of the regional GDP of Portugal, 1890–1980.” Working Papers in Economics 280. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Bazot, G. (2014) “Interregional inequalities, convergence, and growth in France from 1840 to 1911.Annals of Economics and Statistics 113/114: 309–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, T., and Enflo, K. (2017) “Locomotives of local growth: The short-and long-term impact of railroads in Sweden.Journal of Urban Economics 98: 124–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogart, D. (2013) “The transportation revolution in industrializing Britain,” in Floud, R., Humphries, J., and Johnson, P. (eds.) The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S., Federico, G., and Klein, A. (2010) “An Economic History of Modern Europe: Sectoral Developments, 1870–1914,” in Broadberry, S. and O’Rourke, K. (eds.) Unifying the European Experience: An Economic History of Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 5983.Google Scholar
Caron, F. (1997) Histoire des chemins de fer en France. 2 vols. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Caruana-Galizia, P., and Martí-Henneberg, J. (2013) “European regional railways and real income, 1870–1910: A preliminary report.Scandinavian Economic History Review 61 (2): 167–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilosi, D., Murphy, T. E., Studer, R., and Coşkun, T. A. (2013) “Europe’s many integrations: Geography and grain markets, 1620–1913.Explorations in Economic History 50 (1): 4668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R. (1985) British Economic Growth during the Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R. (2004) “Productivity growth in the Industrial Revolution: A new growth accounting perspective.The Journal of Economic History 64 (2): 521–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R. (2005) “Regional GDP in Britain, 1871–1911: Some estimates.Scottish Journal of Political Economy 52 (1): 5464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Vaio, G., and Enflo, K. (2011) “Did globalization drive convergence? Identifying cross-country growth regimes in the long run.European Economic Review 55 (6): 832–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, D. (2018) “Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the impact of transportation infrastructure.American Economic Review 108 (4–5): 899934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, D., and Hornbeck, R. (2016) “Railroads and American economic growth: A ‘market access’ approach.The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2): 799858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, B. (1995) “Financing infrastructure in developing countries: Lessons from the railway age.The World Bank Research Observer 10 (1): 7591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enflo, K. (2014) “Finland’s regional GDP, 1800–2010: Estimates, sources and interpretations.” Lund Papers in Economic History. General Issues 135.Google Scholar
Enflo, K., Alvarez-Palau, E. J., and Marti-Henneberg, J. (2018) “Transportation and regional inequality: The impact of railways in the Nordic countries, 1860–1960.Journal of Historical Geography 62: 5170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enflo, K., Henning, M., and Schön, L. (2014) “Swedish regional GDP 1855–2000: Estimations and general trends in the Swedish regional system.Research in Economic History 30: 4789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, P., Howlett, P., and Schulze, M. S. (2003) “Distribution dynamics: Stratification, polarization, and convergence among OECD economies, 1870–1992.Explorations in Economic History 40 (1): 7897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurostat (2014) “Digital elevation model over Europe, from the GMES RDA Project (EU-DEM).” https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gisco/geodata/reference-data/elevation/eu-dem (accessed December 1).Google Scholar
Federico, G. (2011) “When did European markets integrate?European Review of Economic History 15 (1): 93126.Google Scholar
Felice, E. (2009) “Estimating regional GDP in Italy (1871–2001): Sources, methodology and results.” Working Papers in Economic History 09-07. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.Google Scholar
Fishlow, A. (1965) American Railroads and the Transformation of the Antebellum Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Flora, P. (1983) State, Economy and Society in Western Europe 1815–1975: A Date Handbook in Two Volumes. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, R. W. (1962) “A quantitative approach to the study of railroads in American economic growth: A report of some preliminary findings.The Journal of Economic History 22 (2): 163–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, R. W. (1964) Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, A. (1962) Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hawke, G. R. (1970) Railways and Economic Growth in England and Wales, 1840–1870. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Head, K., and Mayer, T. (2006) “Regional wage and employment responses to market potential in the EU.Regional Science and Urban Economics 36 (5): 573–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herranz-Loncan, A. (2006) “Railroad Impact on backward economies: Spain, 1850–1913.Journal of Economic History 66 (4): 853–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacks, D. S. (2005) “Intra-and international commodity market integration in the Atlantic economy, 1800–1913.Explorations in Economic History 42 (3): 381413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janisse, K. A., Jensen, P., Radu, C., and Sharp, P. (2018) “Regional GDP in Denmark, 1850–2010,” in Rosés, J., and Wolf, N. (eds.) The Economic Development of Europe’s Regions: A Quantitative History since 1900. London: Routledge: 85102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jedwab, R., and Moradi, A. (2016) “The permanent effects of transportation revolutions in poor countries: evidence from Africa.Review of Economics and Statistics 98 (2): 268–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, W., and Shiue, C. (2008) “Tariffs, trains, and trade: The role of institutions versus technology in the expansion of markets.” Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Papers, DP6759.Google Scholar
Koopmans, C., Rietveld, P., and Huijg, A. (2012) “An accessibility approach to railways and municipal population growth, 1840–1930.Journal of Transport Geography 25: 98104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. (1991) Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leunig, T. (2006) “Time is money: A re-assessment of the passenger social savings from Victorian British railways.The Journal of Economic History 66 (3): 635–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, A. (2007). Contours of the World Economy 1–2030 AD: Essays in Macro-Economic History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martí-Henneberg, J. (2005) “Empirical Evidence of Regional Population Concentration in Europe, 1870–2000.Population, Space and Place 11: 269–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martí-Henneberg, J. (2013) “European integration and national models for railway networks (1840–2010).Journal of Transport Geography 26: 126–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milward, R. (2005) Private and Public Enterprise in Europe: Energy, Telecommunications and Transport, 1830–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. (2000) Great Train Race: Railways and the Franco-German Rivalry, 1815–1914. Oxford: Berghan Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modalsli, J. (2018) “Regional income in Norway, 1900–2010,” in Rosés, J., and Wolf, N. (eds.) The Economic Development of Europe’s Regions: A Quantitative History since 1900. London: Routledge: 228–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mojica, L., and Martí-Henneberg, J. (2011) “Railways and population distribution: France, Spain, and Portugal, 1870–2000.Journal of Interdisciplinary History 42 (1): 1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morillas-Torné, M. (2012) “Creation of a geo-spatial database to analyse railways in Europe (1830–2010): A historical GIS approach.Journal of Geographic Information System 4 (2): 176–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obstfeld, M., and Taylor, A. (1997) “The Great Depression as a watershed: International capital mobility over the long run,” in Bordo, M., Goldin, C., and White, E. N. (eds.) The Defining Moment: The Great Depression and the American Economy in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research: 353402.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, K. H., and Williamson, J. G. (1997) “Around the European periphery 1870–1913: Globalization, schooling and growth.European Review of Economic History 1 (2): 153–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, S. (1974) European Economic Integration, 1815–1970. London: Thames Hudson.Google Scholar
Pollard, S. (1981) Peaceful Conquest: The Industrialization of Europe, 1760–1970. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (1999) State Formation, Nation-Building and Mass Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosés, J. R., and Wolf, N. (eds.) (2019) The Economic Development of Europe’s Regions: A Quantitative History since 1900. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rostow, W. W. (1959) “The stages of economic growth.The Economic History Review 12 (1): 116.Google Scholar
Schram, A. (1997) Railways and the Formation of the Italian State in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schulze, M. S. (2007) “Regional income dispersion and market potential in the late nineteenth century Hapsburg Empire.” LSE Economic History Working Papers 106/07.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R., Gregory, I., and Thévenin, T. (2011) “Spatial history: Railways, uneven development, and population change in France and Great Britain, 1850–1914.Journal of Interdisciplinary History 42 (1): 5388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanev, K., Alvarez-Palau, E. J., and Martí-Henneberg, J. (2017) “Railway development and the economic and political integration of the Balkans, c. 1850–2000.Europe-Asia Studies 69 (10): 1601–25.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D. (1999) “War by timetable? The railway race before 1914.Past and Present 162: 163–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirado, D. A., Díez-Minguela, A., and Martínez-Galarraga, J. (2016) “Regional inequality and economic development in Spain, 1860–2010.Journal of Historical Geography 54: 8798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2009) Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. (2010) Energy and the English Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Railroad Integration and Uneven Development on the European Periphery, 1870–1910
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Railroad Integration and Uneven Development on the European Periphery, 1870–1910
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Railroad Integration and Uneven Development on the European Periphery, 1870–1910
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *