Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-xr9nb Total loading time: 0.27 Render date: 2021-09-20T21:32:48.174Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Explaining Pathways to Armed Activism in the Provisional Irish Republican Army, 1969–1972

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Abstract

In this article three pathways into armed activism are identified among those who joined the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) in Northern Ireland between 1969 and 1972. The accounts of former volunteers generally suggest that for those who were already involved in the Republican movement before 1969, a trajectory of mobilization emerged because of the long-standing counterhegemonic consciousness present in their homes, which in turn strongly influenced them as committed Republican militants. For those who joined after 1969 and had previously been involved in other political activities, mobilization was a result of a particular transformative event that triggered the belief that armed struggle was the only approach capable of bringing change in the new sociopolitical situation of the time. For the majority, that is, those who joined after 1969 at a very young age without any previous involvement in organized networks of activism, it began as a more abruptly acquired sense of obligation to defend their own community and retaliate against the Northern Ireland establishment, the Loyalists, and the British army. Overall, the accounts of former volunteers generally suggest that Republican volunteers were fighting first and foremost to reclaim dignity, build honor, and instill a sense of pride in themselves and their community through armed activism. In these terms, the choice of joining the PIRA was justified not as a mere reproduction of an ideological alignment to the traditional Republican aim of achieving Irish reunification but as part of a recognition struggle. At an analytic level, this article illustrates the utility of a multimechanisms interpretative framework. And it contributes to broadening the empirical basis by presenting and analyzing a series of 25 semistructured interviews with former PIRA volunteers.

Type
Special Section: Cultures of Radicalization: Discourse and Practices of Political Violence and Terrorism
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, G. (1996) Before the Dawn: An Autobiography. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Alison, M. (2009) Women and Political Violence: Female Combatants in Ethnonational Conflicts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alonso, R. (2007) The IRA and Armed Struggle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (2002) Joe Cahill: A Life in the IRA. Dublin: O’Brien.Google Scholar
An Phoblacht (1970a) “On this we stand: The rock of the Republic,” February.Google Scholar
An Phoblacht (1970b) “Publicity Bureau clarifies the position of the IRA,” February.Google Scholar
An Phoblacht (1970c) “Tabhacht na Gaeilge,” April.Google Scholar
Bean, K. (2007) The New Politics of Sinn Féin. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Bean, K. Hayes, M. (2002) Republican Voices. Belfast: Seesyu.Google Scholar
Bishop, P. Mallie, E. (1987) The Provisional IRA. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Blee, K. M. Taylor, V. (2002) “Semi-structured interviewing in social movement research,” in Klandermans, B. Staggenborg, S. (eds.) Methods of Social Movement Research. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 92117.Google Scholar
Blee, K. M. Vining, T. (2010) “Risks and ethics of social movement research in a changing political climate.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change 30: 4371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosi, L. (2006) “The dynamic of social movement development: Northern Ireland’s civil rights movement in the 1960s.” Mobilization 11 (1): 81100.Google Scholar
Bosi, L. (2008) “Explaining the emergence process of the civil rights protest in Northern Ireland (1945–1968): Insights from a relational social movement approach.” Journal of Historical Sociology 21 (2–3): 24271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosi, L. (2011) “From ’British rights’ to ’British out’: The Northern Ireland’s civil rights movement between the 1960s and early 1970s,” in Kouki, H. Romanos, E. (eds.) Protest beyond Borders: Contentious Politics in Europe since 1945. Oxford: Berghahn: 12538.Google Scholar
Bosi, L. della Porta, D. (forthcoming) “Patterns of disengagement from political armed activism: A comparative historical sociology analysis of Italy and Northern Ireland,” in Gunning, J. (ed.) Terror No More? State, Societal, and Internal Dynamics in Transforming Violent Conflicts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bottger, A. Strobl, R. (2003) “Potentials and limits of qualitative methods for research on violence,” in Heitmeyer, W. Hagan, J. (eds.) International Handbook of Violence Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 120318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brannan, D. Esler, P. Strindberg, A. (2001) “Talking to ’terrorists’: Towards an independent analytical framework for the study of violent substate activism.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 24 (1): 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, M. Ferguson, N. Hollywood, I. (2007) “Rebels’ perspectives of the legacy of past violence and of the current peace in post-agreement Northern Ireland: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.” Political Psychology 28 (1): 6988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, F. (1978) The Politics of Legitimacy: Struggles in a Belfast Community. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clarke, L. Johnston, K. (2003) Martin McGuinness: From Guns to Government. Edinburgh: Mainstream.Google Scholar
Collins, E. (1997) Killing Rage. London: Granta.Google Scholar
Costello, S. (1966) United Irishman, July.Google Scholar
Coughlan, A. (1966) Tuarisic, August.Google Scholar
Coughlan, A. (2000) “The psychology of terrorism: An agenda for the twenty-first century.” Political Psychology 21 (2): 40520.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. (1992a) “Biographies of social movement activists: State of the art and methodological problems,” in Diani, M. Eyerman, R. (eds.) Studying Collective Action. Newbury Park, CA: Sage: 16893.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. (1995) Political Violence and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Porta, D., ed. (1992b) Social Movements and Violence: Participation in Underground Organizations. London: JAI.Google Scholar
English, R. (2003) Armed Struggle. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Esseveled, J. Eyerman, R. (1992) “Which side are you on? Reflection of methodological issues in the study of ’distasteful’ social movements,” in Diani, M. Eyerman, R. (eds.) Studying Collective Action. Newbury Park, CA: Sage: 21737.Google Scholar
Feenan, D. (2002) “Researching paramilitary violence in Northern Ireland.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 5 (2): 14763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. (2003) “Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation,” in Fraser, N. Honneth, A. (eds.) Redistribution or Recognition? A Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso: 7109.Google ScholarPubMed
Galliher, J. Degregory, J. (1985) Violence in Northern Ireland: Understanding Protestant Perspectives. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.Google Scholar
Greaves, D. (1963) The Irish Question and the British People. London: Connolly.Google Scholar
Hanley, B. Millar, S. (2009) The Lost Revolution: The Story of the Official IRA and the Worker’s Party. Dublin: Penguin Ireland.Google Scholar
Hobson, B. (2003) Recognition Struggles and Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (1996) The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Horgan, J. (2008a) “From profiles to pathways and roots to routes: Perspectives from psychology on radicalization into terrorism.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (618): 8094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, J. (2008b) “Interviewing terrorists: A case for primary research,” in Hsinchun, C. Reid, E. Sinai, J. Silke, A. Ganor, B. (eds.) Terrorism Informatics. New York: Springer: 7399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irish Republican Army (Official) (1972) The IRA Speaks in the 1970s. Dublin: Respol.Google Scholar
Irish Republican Publishing Bureau (1973) Freedom Struggle by the Provisional IRA. Dublin: Irish Republican Publishing Bureau.Google Scholar
Mac Stíofáin, S. (1975) Memoirs of a Revolutionary. London: Gordon Cremonesi.Google Scholar
McGartland, M. (1997) Fifty Dead Men Walking. London: Blake.Google Scholar
McKeown, L. (2001) Out of Time: Irish Republican Prisoners, Long Kesh, 1972–2000. Belfast: Beyond the Pale.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. (1999) Then the Walls Came Down: A Prison Journal. Cork: Mercier.Google Scholar
National Archives, Public Record Office (1972) CAB 128/48/3, CM (72) 13th Conclusions, March 7, CA, 3.Google Scholar
O’Brien, C. (1972) States of Ireland. New York: Pantheon.Google ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, J. (2000) The Arms Trial. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.Google ScholarPubMed
O’Callaghan, S. (1999). The Informer. London: Corgi.Google Scholar
O’Dochartaigh, N. (2005 [1997]) From Civil Rights to Armalites: Derry and the Birth of the Irish Troubles. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dochartaigh, N. (forthcoming) “Nation and neighbourhood: Nationalist mobilisation and local solidarities in the North of Ireland,” in Guelke, A. (ed.) The Challenges of Ethnonationalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
O’Doherty, S. P. (1993) The Volunteer: A Former IRA Man’s True Story. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
O’Leary, B. (2005) “Mission accomplished? Looking back at the IRA.” Field Day Review 1 (1): 21746.Google Scholar
O’Leary, B. McGarry, J. (1993) The Politics of Antagonism: Understanding Northern Ireland. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Passerini, L. (1996) Autobiography of a Generation, Italy’68. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, H. (1989) The Politics of Illusion: A Political History of the IRA. London: Serif.Google Scholar
Patterson, H. Kaufman, E. (2007) Unionism and Orangeism in Northern Ireland since 1945: The Decline of the Loyal Family. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. (2003) “Recognition and the struggle for political voice,” in Hobson, B. (ed.) Recognition Struggles and Social Movements: Contested Identities, Agency, and Power. London: Routledge: 26374.Google Scholar
PIRA Army Council (1971) “Statement from Army Council,” by Sean McStiophan, Republican News, October 30.Google Scholar
Polletta, F. (2006) “Mobilization forum: Awkward movements.” Mobilization 11 (4): 47578.Google Scholar
Punch, M. (1994) “Politics and ethics in qualitative research,” in Denzin, N. K. Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage: 83104.Google Scholar
Ranstorp, M., ed. (2006) Mapping Terrorism Research: State of the Art, Gaps, and Future Directions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roy, O. (2004) Globalised Islam: The Search for a New Ummah. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Scarman, L. S. (1972) Violence and Civil Disturbances in Northern Ireland in 1969: Report of Tribunal of Inquiry. Belfast: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Seidman, G. W. (1993) Manufacturing Militance: Workers’ Movements in Brazil and South Africa, 1970–1985. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shirlow, P. Tonge, J. McAuley, J. McGlynn, C. (2010) Abandoning Historical Conflict? Former Political Prisoners and Reconciliation in Northern Ireland. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silke, A., ed. (2004) Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements, and Failures. London: Cass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluka, J. (1995) “Reflections on managing danger in fieldwork: Dangerous anthropology in Belfast,” in Nordstrom, C. Robben, A. (eds.) Fieldwork under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival. Berkeley: University of California Press: 28396.Google Scholar
Smith, J. (1995) “Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis,” in Smith, J. Harre, R. Langenhove, L. V. (eds.) Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage: 926.Google Scholar
Smyth, M. Robinson, G. (2001) Researching Violently Divided Societies: Ethical and Methodological Issues. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
This Week (1970) “Republicanism: Why it has failed.” July 31.Google Scholar
Viterna, J. (2006) “Pulled, pushed, and persuaded: Explaining women’s mobilization into the Salvadoran guerrilla army.” American Journal of Sociology 112 (1): 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, G. (2006) “The Falls Road curfew revisited.” Irish Studies Review 14 (3): 32542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, B. (1984) John Hume: Statesman of the Troubles. Belfast: Blackstaff.Google Scholar
White, R. (1993) Provisional Irish Republicans: An Oral and Interpretative History. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
White, R. (2000) “Issues in the study of political violence: Understanding the motives of participants in small group political violence.” Terrorism and Political Violence 12 (1): 95108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. (2006) Ruairí Ó Brádaigh: The Life and Politics of an Irish Revolutionary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
White, R. (2007) “’I’m not too sure what I told you the last time’: Methodological notes on accounts from high-risk activists in the Irish Republican movement.” Mobilization 12 (3): 287305.Google Scholar
Wood, E. (2003) Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, E. (2006) “The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones.” Qualitative Sociology 29 (3): 37386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwerman, G. (1992) “Conservative and feminist images of women associated with armed, clandestine organizations in the United States.” International Social Movement Research 4: 13359.Google Scholar
7
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Explaining Pathways to Armed Activism in the Provisional Irish Republican Army, 1969–1972
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Explaining Pathways to Armed Activism in the Provisional Irish Republican Army, 1969–1972
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Explaining Pathways to Armed Activism in the Provisional Irish Republican Army, 1969–1972
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *