Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:44:43.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Landed Property, State Authority, and Civil War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Alfred J. Rieber*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Freeze, Gregory L., “The Soslovie (Estate) Paradigm and Russian Social History,” American Historical Review 91 (February 1986): 1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Lewin, Moshe, The Making of the Soviet System: Essays in the Social History of Interwar Russia (New York: Pantheon, 1985), pp. 2223, 191–192Google Scholar.

3. Bonnell, Victoria E., Roots of Rebellion: Workers Politics and Organization in St. Petersburgand Moscow, 1900–1914 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).Google Scholar

4. Wortman, Richard, “Moscow and Petersburg: The Problem of Political Center in TsaristRussia, 1881–1914,” in Rites of Power: Symbolism, Ritual, and Politics since the Middle Ages, ed. Wilentz, Sean (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1986), p. 268.Google Scholar

5. Rowney, Don Karl, “Organizational Change and Social Adaptation,” in Russian Officialdom: The Bureaucratization of Russian Society from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century, ed. Pintner, Walter M. and Rowney, Don Karl (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980), p. 311.Google Scholar

6. Wildman, Allan K., The End of the Russian Imperial Army (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980), p. 104.Google Scholar

7. Coquin, Francois-Xavier, La Siberie: Peuplement et immigration paysanne au XIXe siécle (Paris: Institute d'etudes slaves, 1969), p. 682.Google Scholar

8. Aziatskaia Rossiia (St. Petersburg, 1914) 1: 178–199, 383, diagrams following pp. 490 and 492

9. Brooks, Jeffrey, When Russia Learned to Read. Literacy and Popular Culture 1861–1917 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Eklof, Ben, Russian Peasant Schools. Officialdom, Village Culture and Popular Pedagogy, 1861–1914 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986 Google Scholar.

10. Kenez, Peter, Civil War in South Russia, 1919–1920, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977).Google Scholar

11. Svatnikov, S. G., Rossiia i Don (Vienna: Donskoi istoricheskoi komissii, 1924), p. 572.Google Scholar

12. Krasnov, P. N., “Vsevelikoe voisko donskoe,” Arkhiv russkoi revoliutsii, (Berlin, 1922) 5:Google Scholar

13. Koblov, la., O tatarizatsii inorodtsev Privolzhskogo kraia (Kazan, 1910)Google Scholar; Edelman, Robert, Gentry Politics on the Eve of the Russian Revolution: The Nationalist Party 1907–1917 (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1980)Google Scholar; Riabushinskii, V. P., Velikaia Rossiia: Sbomik stateipo voennymi obshchestvennym voprosam, 2 volumes (Moscow, 1911)Google Scholar; Utro Rossii, 5, 6, 7 November and 2 December1914.

14. Blank, Stephen, “The Struggle for Soviet Bashkiriia 1917–1923,” Nationality Papers 10 (Spring 1983): 126 Google Scholar. For a similar pattern in Turkestan see idem, “The Contested Terrain: Muslim Political Participation in Soviet Turkestan, 1917–1920,” Central Asian Survey, forthcoming.

15. For Makhno, and Antonov, , Radkey, Oliver, The Unknown Civil War in Russia (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1976)Google Scholar; for the Black Sea N. Voronovich, Republic, “Mezh dvukhognei,” Arkhiv russkoi revoliutsii 7: 109110 Google Scholar.