Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:13:15.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental results for the flexible joint cable-suspended manipulator of ICaSbot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

M. H. Korayem*
Affiliation:
Robotic Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
M. Bamdad
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Semnan, Iran
H. Tourajizadeh
Affiliation:
Robotic Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
A. H. Korayem
Affiliation:
Robotic Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
R. M. Zehtab
Affiliation:
Robotic Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
H. Shafiee
Affiliation:
Robotic Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
A. Arvani
Affiliation:
Robotic Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: hkorayem@iust.ac.ir

Summary

In this paper, design, dynamic, and control of the motors of a spatial cable robot are presented considering flexibility of the joints. End-effector control in order to control all six spatial degrees of freedom (DOFs) of the system and motor control in order to control the joints flexibility are proposed here. Corresponding programing of its operation is done by formulating the kinematics and dynamics and also control of the robot. Considering the existence of gearboxes, flexibility of the joints is modeled in the feed-forward term of its controller to achieve better accuracy. A two sequential closed-loop strategy consisting of proportional derivative (PD) for linear actuators in joint space and computed torque method for nonlinear end-effector in Cartesian space is presented for further accuracy. Flexibility is estimated using modeling and simulation by MATLAB and SimDesigner. A prototype has been built and experimental tests have been done to verify the efficiency of the proposed modeling and controller as well as the effect of flexibility of the joints. The ICaSbot (IUST Cable-Suspended robot) is an under-constrained six-DOF parallel robot actuated by the aid of six suspended cables. An experimental test is conducted for the manufactured flexible joint cable robot of ICaSbot and the outputs of sensors are compared with simulation. The efficiency of the proposed schemes is demonstrated.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Merlet, J. P., Parallel Robots (Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Korayem, M. H. and Bamdad, M., “Dynamic load carrying capacity of cable-suspended parallel manipulators,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 44, 829840 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Korayem, M. H., Bamdad, M. and Saadat, M., “Workspace Analysis of Cable-Suspended Robots with Elastic Cable,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference Robotics and Biomimetics ROBIO, Sanya (Dec. 15–18, 2007), pp. 19421947.Google Scholar
4.Albus, J., Bostelman, R. and Dagalakis, N., “The NIST robocrane,” J. Robot. Syst. 10 (5), 709724 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Campbell, P. D., Swaim, P. L. and Thompson, C. J., “Charlotte Robot Technology for Space and Terrestrial Applications,” Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Environmental Systems, San Diego, SAE Technical Paper 951520 (1995).Google Scholar
6.Osumi, H., Arai, T. and Asama, H., “Development of a seven degrees of freedom crane with three wires—concept, design and control,” J. Japan Soc. Precis. Eng. 59 (5), 767772 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Williams, R. L. II, Albus, J. S. and Bostelman, R. V., “Cable-Based Metrology System for Sculpting Assistance,” ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Chicago, Illinois, USA (Sep. 2–6, 2003), pp. 11651174.Google Scholar
8.Merlet, J. P., “Kinematics of the Wire-Driven Parallel Robot MARIONET using Linear Actuators,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA (May 19–23, 2008), pp. 38573862.Google Scholar
9.Pusey, J., Fattah, A., Agrawal, S. K. and Messina, E., “Design and workspace analysis of a 6–6 cable-suspended parallel robot,” Mech. Mach. Theory 39 (7), 761778 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Zhiyong, Y., Wenhao, F., Jiang, W. and Tian, H., “Digital platform-based multi-domain virtual prototype simulation on a high-speed parallel manipulator,” Robotica 30, 827835 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Habibnejad, M., Bamdad, M., Zehtab, R. M. and Iranpour, M., “First experimental results of load carrying capacity for a planar cable-suspended Manipulator,” International Journal of Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology 3 (4), 1116 (Jan 18, 2011).Google Scholar
12.Zhang, Y., Agrawal, S. K. and Piovoso, M. J., “Coupled Dynamics of Flexible Cables and Rigid End-Effector for a Cable Suspended Robot,” American Control Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (Jun. 14–16, 2006), pp. 38803885.Google Scholar
13.Spong, M. W., Modeling and Control of Elastic Joint Robots (Coordinate Science Lab., University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Illinois, USA, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Luca, D., Siciliano, B. and Zollo, L., “PD control with on-line gravity compensation for robots with elastic joints: Theory and experiments,” Elsevier Autom. 41 (10), 18091819 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Taghirad, H. D. and Khosravi, M. A., “Stability analysis and robust composite controller synthesis for flexible joint robots,” Advanced Robotics 20 (2), 181211 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Taghirad, H. D. and Rahimi, H., “Composite QFT Controller Design for Flexible Joint Robots,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Toronto, Ont. (Aug. 28–31, 2005), pp. 583588.Google Scholar
17.Ider, S. K. and Korkmaz, O., “Trajectory tracking control of parallel robots in the presence of joint drive flexibility,” J. Sound Vib. 319, 7790 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Wang, S., Hikita, H., Kubo, H., Zhao, Y., Huang, Z. and Ifukube, T., “Kinematics and dynamics of a 6 degree-of-freedom fully parallel manipulator with elastic joints,” Mech. Mach. Theory 38, 439461 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Korayem, M. H., Davarzani, E. and Bamdad, M., “Optimal trajectory planning with dynamic load carrying capacity of flexible cable-suspended manipulator,” Sci. Iranica 17 (4), 315326 (2010).Google Scholar
20.Korayem, M. H., Tourajizadeh, H. and Bamdad, M., “Dynamic load carrying capacity of flexible cable suspended robot: Robust feedback linearization control approach,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 60 (3–4), 341363 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Alp, A. B., Cable-Suspended Parallel Robots, M.Sc. Thesis (DE, USA: Mechanical Faculty of the University of Delaware, 2001).Google Scholar
22.Korayem, M. H., Bamdad, M., Tourajizadeh, H., Shafiee, H., Zehtab, R. M. and Iranpour, A., “Development of ICaSbot a cable suspended robot with 6 DOFs,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Springer-Verlag (2012).Google Scholar
23.Caldwell, D., Minimalist Fault Masking, Detection and Recovery Techniques for Mitigating Single Event Effects in Non-Radiation-Hardened Microcontrollers, Ph.D. Dissertation (Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Computer Science Department, 1998).Google Scholar
24.“Reliance-Basic Motor Theory,” Baldor Electric Company, available at: http://www.reliance.com/mtr/mtrthrmn.htm (2007).Google Scholar
25.Vadia, J., Fritz, J. and Russ, D. H., Planar Cable Direct Driven Robot: Hardware Implementation, M.Sc. Thesis (Ohio, USA: College of Engineering and Technology of Ohio University, 2003).Google Scholar