Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:55:17.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing robot programming languages using an existing language as a base—A viewpoint

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

S. T. Rock
S. T. Rock
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University College of Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA28PP (U.K.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The development of robot languages has followed a pattern similar to that of conventional programming languages, where robot languages have been based on an existing programming language. This paper first identifies the use of an existing base as one way of developing robot programming languages, and discusses the areas of difficulty in this approach. Then, on-line and off-line programming of robots is discussed and the requirements of robot programming languages that are different to those of non-specialised programming languages are presented. A discussion and evaluation of some programming languages in terms of their appropriateness for use as the base for an intelligent robot programming language is presented. This leads to the conclusion that no current language forms an adequate base for intelligent robot programming languages. What is needed as a base is a language for use in the artificial intelligence domain, that incorporates real-time facilities.

Keywords

Programming languagesIntelligent robotsArtificial intelligence
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 71 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Schreiber, R.R., “How to teach a robot” Robotics Today 51–56 (06, 1984).Google Scholar
2.Gull, F.A., “Robot programming systems” Proceedings SAROCIM – Symposium on Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacture, Johannesburg (03, 1986).Google Scholar
3.Barnes, J.G.P., Programming in Ada, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, 1984).Google Scholar
4.Barnes, J.G.P., “ADA and APSE”, Proceedings of seminar on Ada: the language and its supoort environment, Johannesburg (10, 1984).Google Scholar
5.Buzzard, G.D. and Mudge, T.N., “Object-based computing and the Ada language” IEEE Computer 18, 3, 11–19 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Volz, R.A., Mudge, T.N. and Gal, D.A., “Using Ada as a programming language for robot-based manufacturing cells” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 14, 6, 863–878 (1984).Google Scholar
7.Brodie, L., Starting FORTH (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1981).Google Scholar
8.Wirth, N., Programming in Modula-2, 2nd edition, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982).Google Scholar
9.Goldberg, A. and Robson, D., Smalltalk-80, the Language and its Implementation, (Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, 1983).Google Scholar
10.Clocksin, W.F. and Mellish, C.S., Programming in Prolog (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981).Google Scholar
11.Siklóssy, L., Let's Talk LISP (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1976).Google Scholar
12.Weinreb, D. and Moon, D., LISP Machine Manual (Symbolics, Cambridge, Mass., 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar