Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T06:45:12.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design and implementation of a swimming robot with pectoral fins only

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2022

Farah Abbas Naser Open the ORCID record for Farah Abbas Naser [Opens in a new window]  and
Mofeed Turky Rashid
Farah Abbas Naser*
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering Department, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq
Mofeed Turky Rashid
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering Department, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: farahabbasnaser@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The use of swimming robots has increased widely in recent years due to the need of using them in situations where human intervention is difficult or not allowed. Exploring depths of seas, military interventions, or entering areas where the amount of water pollution is high that may threaten the lives of divers. In such cases, the best alternative for humans is to use swimming robots. This paper presents a swimming robot based on Labriform swimming mode. First, it starts with an analytical study of the effect of the fins shape on the performance of a robotic fish. The suggested design of the pectoral fins is concave. The effect of such a design would help largely in achieving the highest thrust in comparison to flat designs provided in the literature. Secondly, a variation in the velocity between the power and recovery strokes is accomplished and a maximum thrust can be obtained when the velocity of the power stroke is three times the velocity of recovery stroke. Thirdly, the kinematics and dynamics of the swimming robot are derived and an evaluation of the total hydrodynamic forces that are exerted on the robot’s body is studied via the computational fluid dynamics method from SOLIDWORKS® platform. Finally, the obtained results are compared to other designs in the literature in terms of some dimensionless numbers of biological fish to examine the efficiency. The proposed design has been validated theoretically and examined experimentally. The results of the simulation and practical experiments confirmed the validity of the design.

Keywords

labriformpectoral finsswimming robotconcave finsforward velocityStrouhal numberReynolds number
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 40 , Issue 10 , October 2022 , pp. 3557 - 3585
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Zhang, F., Ennasr, O., Litchman, E. and Tan, X., “Autonomous sampling of water columns using gliding robotic fish: Algorithms and harmful-algae-sampling experiments,” IEEE Syst. J. 10(3), 1271–1281 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Y. J., Huh, T. M., Park, D. and Cho, K.-J., “Design of a variable-stiffness flapping mechanism for maximizing the thrust of a bio-inspired underwater robot,” Bioinspir. Biomim. 9(3), 036002 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebrahimi, M. and Abbaspour, M., “A comparative numerical study on the performances and vortical patterns of two bioinspired oscillatory mechanisms: Undulating and pure heaving,” Appl. Bionics Biomech. 2015(1), 1–25 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Z., Yu, J., Tan, M. and Zhang, J., “Implementing flexible and fast turning maneuvers of a multijoint robotic fish,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 19(1), 329–338 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihalitsis, M. and Bellwood, D., “Morphological and functional diversity of piscivorous fishes on coral reefs,” Coral Reefs 38(5), 945–954 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitorus, P. E., Nazaruddin, Y. Y., Leksono, E. and Budiyono, A., “Design and implementation of paired pectoral fins locomotion of labriform fish applied to a fish robot,” J. Bionic Eng. 6(1), 37–45 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raj, A. and Thakur, A., “Fish-inspired robots: design, sensing, actuation, and autonomy—A review of research,” Bioinspir. Biomim. 11(3), 031001 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salazar, R., Campos, A., Fuentes, V. and Abdelkefi, A., “A review on the modeling, materials, and actuators of aquatic unmanned vehicles,” Ocean Eng. 172(1), 257–285 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popovic, M. B.. Biomechanics and Robotics. New York: Jenny Stanford Publishing (CRC Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, Q., Xu, J., Yang, S. and Yan, L., “Design and Implementation of a Biomimetic Robotic Fish with 3D Locomotion,” In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA) , Taiwan (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castaño, M. L. and Tan, X., “Model predictive control-based path-following for tail-actuated robotic fish,” ASME. J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. Control 141(7), 31 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meurer, C., Simha, A., Kotta, Ü. and Kruusmaa, M., “Nonlinear Orientation Controller for a Compliant Robotic Fish Based on Asymmetric Actuation,” In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , Montreal, QC, Canada (2019) pp. 4688–4694.Google Scholar
Saab, W., Rone, W. and Ben-Tzvi, P., “Discrete modular serpentine robotic tail: Design, analysis and experimentation,” Robotica 36(7), 994–1018 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, J., White, C., Wainwright, D. K., Di Santo, V., Lauder, G. V., Bart-Smith, H., “Tuna robotics: A high-frequency experimental platform exploring the performance space of swimming fishes,” Sci. Robot. 4(34), 1 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aparicio-García, C. T.. D., Naula Duchi, E. A., Garza-Castañón, L. E., Vargas-Martínez, A., Martínez-López, J. I. and Minchala-Ávila, L. I., “Design, construction, and modeling of a BAUV with propulsion system based on a parallel mechanism for the caudal fin,” Appl. Sci. 10(7), 2426 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pham, V. A., Nguyen, T. T., Lee, B. R. and Vo, T. Q, “Dynamic analysis of a robotic fish propelled by flexible folding pectoral fins,” Robotica. 38(4), 699–718 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, T., Watanabe, K. and Nagai, I., “Thrust Analysis of Propulsion Mechanisms with Pectoral Fins in a Manta Robot,” In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 619 (November 2018) pp. 6–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behbahani, S. B. and Tan, X., “Role of pectoral fin flexibility in robotic fish performance,” J. Nonlinear Sci. 27(4), 1155–1181 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behbahani, S. B. and Tan, X., “Bio-inspired flexible joints with passive feathering for robotic fish pectoral fins,” Bioinspir. Biomim. 11(3), 036009 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, Y., Li, Z. and Du, R., “Robot fish with two-DOF pectoral fins and a wire-driven caudal fin,” Adv. Robot. 32(1), 25–36 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coral, W., Rossi, C., Curet, O. M., Castro, D., “Design and assessment of a flexible fish robot actuated by shape memory alloys,” Bioinspir. Biomim. 13(5), 056009 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, W., Ming, A. and Shimojo, M., “Development of high-performance soft robotic fish by numerical coupling analysis,” Appl. Bionics Biomech. 2018, 1–12 (2018).Google ScholarPubMed
Pfeil, S., Katzer, K., Kanan, A., Mersch, J., Zimmermann, M., Kaliske, M. and Gerlach, G., “A biomimetic fish fin-like robot based on textile reinforced silicone,” Micromachines (Basel) 11(3), 298 (2020).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cai, Y., Bi, S., Li, G., Hildre, H. and Zhang, H., “From natural complexity to biomimetic simplification: The realization of bionic fish inspired by the cownose ray,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag.  26(3), 27–38 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behbahani, S. B., Wang, J. and Tan, X., “A Dynamic Model for Robotic Fish with Flexible Pectoral Fins,” In: IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) , Wollongong, Australia (2013) pp. 1552–1557.Google Scholar
Ma, H., Cai, Y., Wang, Y., Bi, S. and Gong, Z., “A biomimetic cownose ray robot fish with oscillating and chordwise twisting flexible pectoral fins,” Ind. Robot Int. J. 42(3), 214–221 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naser, F. A. and Rashid, M. T., “Design, modeling, and experimental validation of a concave-shape pectoral fin of labriform-mode swimming robot,” Eng. Rep. 1(5), 1–17 (2019).Google Scholar
Naser, F. A. and Rashid, M. T., “Effect of Reynold Number and Angle of Attack on the Hydrodynamic Forces Generated from A Bionic Concave Pectoral Fins,” In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 745 (16-17 December 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naser, F. A. and Rashid, M. T., “Study the influence of concave pectoral fin morphology in the performance of labriform swimming robot,” Iraqi J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 16(1), 54–61 (2020).Google Scholar
Rashid, M. T. and Rashid, A. T., “Design and Implementation of Swimming Robot based on Labriform Model,” In: Al-Sadeq Int. Conf. on Multidisciplinary in IT and Commun. Sci. and App. (AIC-MITCSA) (Iraq, 2016).Google Scholar
Ngo, V. and McHenry, M. J., “The hydrodynamics of swimming at intermediate Reynolds,” J. Exp. Biol. 217, 2740–2751 (2014).Google ScholarPubMed
Gibouin, F., Raufaste, C., Bouret, Y. and Argentina, M., “Study of the thrust–drag balance with a swimming robotic fish,” Phys. Fluids 30(9), 091901 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eloy, C., “Optimal strouhal number for swimming animals,” J. Fluids Struct. 30(5), 205–218 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, D. B., Lauder, G. V. and Smits, A. J., “Maximizing the efficiency of a flexible propulsor using experimental optimization,” J. Fluid Mech. 767, 430–448 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., “A review on robotic fish enabled by ionic polymer–metal composite artificial muscles,” Robot. Biomim. 4(1), 258 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rashid, M. T., Naser, F. A. and Mjily, A., “Autonomous Micro-Robot Like Sperm based on Piezoelectric Actuator,” In: International Conference on Electrical, Communication, and Computer Engineering (ICECCE) (2020) pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Fossen, T. I.. Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control. 1st edition (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Norway, 122, 2011).Google Scholar
Aureli, M., Kopman, V. and Porfiri, M., “Free-locomotion of underwater vehicles actuated by ionic polymer metal composites,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 15(4), 603–614 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naser, F. A. and Rashid, M. T., “Implementation of steering process for labriform swimming robot based on differential drive principle,” J. Appl. Nonlinear Dyn. 10(4), 721–737 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naser, F. A. and Rashid, M. T., “Labriform swimming robot with steering and diving capabilities,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 103(14), 54–61 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behbahani, S. B. and Tan, X., “Design and modeling of flexible passive rowing joint for robotic fish pectoral fins,” IEEE Trans. Robot 32(5), 1119–1132 (2016).10.1109/TRO.2016.2593452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, N. and Su, Y., “Fluid dynamics of biomimetic pectoral fin propulsion using immersed boundary method,” Appl. Bionics Biomech. 1(7), 2016–2022 (2016).Google Scholar
Fedak, V, Durovsky, F, and Uveges, R. Analysis of Robotic System Motion in SimMechanics and MATLAB GUI Environment in MATLAB Applications for the Practical Engineer. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen (2014).Google Scholar
Hernandez Beleño, R. D., Mora Gonzales, P. A., Avilés Sánchez, O. F. and Ferreira, J. V., “Dynamic modeling and control PID of an underwater robot based on method hardware in the loop,” Int. Rev. Mech. Eng. 10(7), 482–490 (2016).Google Scholar
Su, S., Jiang, Y. and Shi, O., “Robotic fish’s movement based on kalman filter and PID control,” Appl. Mech. Mater. 568–570, 1059–1062 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunes, J.. Dimensionless Physical Quantities in Science and Engineering. London: Elsevier Inc., pp. 1–443 (2012).Google Scholar
Guerrero, J. E., “Wake signature and Strouhal number dependence of finite-span flapping wings,” J. Bionic Eng. 7(S4), 109–122 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge, D. J., “Numerical simulations of undulatory swimming at moderate Reynolds number,” Bioinspir. Biomim. 1(4), 19–24 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatton, R. L., Burton, L. J., Hosoi, A. E. and Choset, H., “Geometric Maneuverability with Applications to Low Reynolds Number Swimming,” In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (September 25-30, 2011).Google Scholar
Saadat, M., Fish, F. E., Domel, A. G., Di Santo, V., Lauder, G. V. and Haj-Hariri, H., “On the rules for aquatic locomotion,” Phys. Rev. Fluids 2(8), 109 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.083102CrossRefGoogle Scholar