Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:59:13.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison study of two planar 2-DOF parallel mechanisms: one with 2-RRR and the other with 3-RRR structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2010

Jun Wu*
Affiliation:
Institute of Manufacturing Engineering, Department of Precision Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. China
Jinsong Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Manufacturing Engineering, Department of Precision Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. China
Liping Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Manufacturing Engineering, Department of Precision Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: wu-j03@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn

Summary

This paper deals with a comparative study of two planar two degrees of freedom parallel mechanisms: one with 2-RRR and the other with 3-RRR structures. For a fair comparison, both 3-RRR and 2-RRR mechanisms are symmetrical. The kinematics and Jacobian matrix of the two mechanisms are studied. Conditioning index, stiffness index and payload index are proposed to compare the condition, stiffness and payload performance of the two mechanisms. The results show that the 2-RRR and 3-RRR mechanisms have the similar condition performance, and the planar 3-RRR mechanism has better payload and stiffness performance than the 2-RRR one.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Wu, J., Wang, J. S., Li, T. M. and Wang, L. P., “Dynamic analysis of the 2-DOF planar parallel mechanism of a heavy duty hybrid machine tool,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 34 (3–4), 413420 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Wu, J., Wang, J. S., Li, T. M. and Wang, L. P., “Analysis and application of a 2-DOF planar parallel mechanism,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 129 (4), 434437 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.McCloy, D., “Some comparisons of serial-driven and parallel driven mechanisms,” Robotica 8 (4), 355362 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Liu, X. J., Wang, J. S. and Pritschow, G., “Kinematics, singularity and workspace of planar 5R symmetrical parallel mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 41 (2), 145169 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Gosselin, C. M. and Jean, M., “Determination of the workspace of planar parallel mechanisms with joint limits,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 17 (3), 129138 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kock, S. and Schumacher, W., “A Parallel X-Y Mechanism with Actuation Redundancy for High-Speed and Active-Stiffness Applications,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium (1998) pp. 22952300.Google Scholar
7.Kock, S. and Schumacher, W., “A Mixed Elastic and Rigid-Body Dynamic Model of an Actuation Redundant Parallel Robot with High-Reduction Gears,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA (2000), pp. 19181923.Google Scholar
8.Cheng, H., Liu, G. F., Xiong, Z. H. and Li, Z. X., “Advantages and Dynamics of Parallel Mechanisms with Redundant Actuation,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Maui, HI (2001) pp. 171176.Google Scholar
9.Liu, G. F., Wu, Y. L., Wu, X. Z., Kuen, Y. Y. and Li, Z. X., “Analysis and Control of Redundant Parallel Mechanisms,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Seoul, Korea (2001) pp. 37483754.Google Scholar
10.Merlet, J. P., “Redundant parallel mechanisms,” Lab. Robot. Autom. 8 (1), 1724 (1996).3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Wu, J., Wang, J. S. and Wang, L. P., “Optimal kinematic design and application of a redundantly actuated 3DOF planar parallel manipulator,” J. Mech. Des. 130 (5), 05450310545035 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Waldron, K. J. and Hunt, K. H., “Series-parallel dualities in actively coordinated mechanisms,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 10 (5), 473480 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar