Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-xbgml Total loading time: 0.396 Render date: 2022-08-18T02:45:08.783Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Rehabilitation in stroke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

KJ Fullerton*
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland
*
Dr KJ Fullerton MD, MRCP, Lurgan Hospital, Sloan Street, Lurgan, Craigavon, Co. Armagh, Northern Ireland.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Rehabilitation
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Adams, GF. History and the half-dead disease. Ulster Med J 1972; 41: 89107.Google ScholarPubMed
2Maguire, PA, Taylor, IK, Stout, RW. Elderly patients in acute medical wards: factors predicting length of stay in hospital. Br Med J 1986; 1251–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Wade, DT, Wood, VA, Langton, Hewer R. Use of hospital resources by acute stroke patients. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1985; 19: 4852.Google ScholarPubMed
4King's Fund Forum Consensus Statement. The treatment of stroke. London: King's Fund, 1988.Google Scholar
5Dearden, MN. Ischaemic brain. Lancet 1985; ii: 255–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Wade, DT, Wood, VA, Heller, A, Maggs, J, Langton, Hewer R. Walking after stroke: measurement and recovery in the first three months. Scand J Rehabil Med 1987; 19: 2530.Google Scholar
7Heller, A, Wade, DT, Wood, VA, Sunderland, A, Langton, Hewer R, Ward, E. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 714–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Skilbeck, CE, Wade, DT, Langton, Hewer R, Wood, VA. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Langton, Hewer R, Holbrook, M. The Bristol Stroke Unit. Health Trends 1983; 15: 1518.Google Scholar
10Warlow, C, Ogston, D, Douglas, AS. Deep venous thrombosis of the legs after strokes. Br Med J 1976; 1: 1178–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Gordon, C, Langton, Hewer R, Wade, DT. Dysphagia in acute stroke. Br Med J 1987; 295: 411–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12House, A. Depression after stroke. Br Med J 1987; 294: 7678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Langton, Hewer R. Rehabilitation after stroke. Quart J Med 1990; 76: 659–74.Google Scholar
14Royal College of Physicians. Stroke – towards better management. London: Royal College of Physicians, 1989.Google Scholar
15Robinson, RG, Kubos, KL, Starr, LB, Rao, K, Price, TR. Mood disorders in stroke patients: importance of location of lesion. Brain 1984; 107: 8193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Starkstein, SE, Robinson, RG, Berthier, ML, Price, TR. Depressive disorders following posterior circulation as compared with middle cerebral artery infarcts. Brain 1988; 111: 375–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Lim, ML, Ebrahim, SBJ. Depression after stroke: a hospital treatment survey. Postgrad Med J 1983; 59: 489–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Allen, CMC. Predicting the outcome in stroke: a prognostic score. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 475–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Fullerton, KJ, MacKenzie, G, Stout, RW. Prognostic indices in stroke. Quart J Med 1988; 66: 147–62.Google ScholarPubMed
20Oxbury, JM, Greenhall, RCD, Grainger, KMR. Predicting outcome of stroke: acute stage after cerebral infarction. Br Med J 1975; 3: 125–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Wade, DT, Skilbeck, CE, Wood, VA, Hewer, RL. Long term survival after stroke. Age Ageing 1984; 13: 357–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Fullerton, KJ. Prognostic factors in acute stroke research. In: Arnery, WK, Bousser, MG, Rose, FC eds. Clinical trial methodology in stroke. London: Ballière Tindall, 1989: 317.Google Scholar
23Mathew, NT, Meyer, SM, Rivera, VM. Double blind evaluation of glycerol therapy in acute cerebral infarction. Lancet 1972; ii: 1327–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Barer, DH. Continence after stroke: useful predictor or goal of therapy? Age and Ageing 1989; 18: 183–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Barer, DH, Mitchell, JRA. Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: do multivariate models help? Quart J Med 1989; 70: 2739.Google ScholarPubMed
26Ebrahim, S, Nouri, F, Barer, D. Measuring disability after stroke. J Epidemiol Community Health 1985; 39: 8689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Wade, DT, Langton, Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Andrews, K. Rehabilitation of the older adult. London: Edward Arnold, 1987.Google Scholar
29Rothi, LJ. Restitution and substitution: two theories of recovery with application to neurobehavioural treatment. J Clin Neuropsychology 1983; 5: 7381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Bobath, B. Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. London: William Heinemann, 1978.Google Scholar
31Wade, DT. Organization of stroke care services. Clinical Rehabilitation 1989; 3: 227–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Stone, SP. Stroke therapy teams. Clinical Rehabilitation 1989; 3: 239–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Stevens, RS. Stroke units. Clinical Rehabilitation 1989; 3: 235–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Haberman, S, Capildeo, R, Rose, FC. The seasonal variation in mortality from cerebrovascular disease. J Neurol Sci 1981; 52: 2536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Wade, DT, Langton, Hewer R, Skilbeck, CE, David, RM. Principles of assessment. In: Wade, DT, Langton, Hewer R, Skilbeck, CE, David, RM eds. Stroke: a critical approach to diagnosis, treatment and management. Cambridge: Chapman and Hall, 1985: 6786.Google Scholar
36Medical Research Council. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. London: HMSO, 1976.Google Scholar
37Demeurisse, G, Demol, O, Robaye, E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 1980; 19: 382–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Fugl-Meyer, AR, Jaasko, L, Leyman, I, Olsson, S, Steglind, S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1: A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 1331.Google ScholarPubMed
39Miller, N. Dyspraxia and its management. London: Croom Helm, 1986.Google Scholar
40Miller, N. The assessment of limb dyspraxia. Clinical Rehabilitation 1988; 2: 177–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41De, Renzi, Pieczuro, , Vignolo, . Ideational apraxia, a quantitative study. Neuropsychologia 1968; 6: 4152.Google Scholar
42Barer, DH, Edmans, JA, Lincoln, NB. Screening for perceptual disorders in stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation 1990; 4: 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Kinsbourne, M. Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. In: Friedland, RP, Weinstein, EA eds. Hemi-inattention and hemisphere specialisation. New York: Raven Press, 1977: 4149.Google Scholar
44Heilman, KM, Pandya, DN, Karol, EA, Gerschwind, N. Auditory inattention. Arch Neurol 1971; 24: 323–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Bender, MB, Shapiro, MF, Schappell, AW. Extinction phenomena in hemiplegia. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1949; 62: 717–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Barer, DH. The influence of visual and tactile inattention on predictions for recovery from acute stroke. Quart J Med 1990; 74: 2132.Google ScholarPubMed
47Hurwitz, LJ. Sensory deficits in hemiplegia. Physiotherapy 1965; 52: 338–42.Google Scholar
48Isaacs, B. Identification of disability in the stroke patient. Modern Geriatrics 1971; 1: 390402.Google Scholar
49Leo, KC, Sodberg, GL. Relationship between perception of joint position sense and limb synergies in patients with hemiplegia. Phys Therapy 1981; 61: 1433–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Prescott, RJ, Garraway, WM, Akhtar, AJ. Predicting functional outcome following acute stroke using a standard clinical examination. Stroke 1982; 13: 641–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51Adams, GF, Hurwitz, LJ. Mental barriers to recovery from strokes. Lancet 1963; ii: 533–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Adams, GF. Cerebrovascular disability and the ageing brain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1974.Google Scholar
53Denes, G, Semenza, C, Stoppa, E, Lis, A. Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. Brain 1982; 105: 543–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Fullerton, KJ, McSherry, D, Stout, RW. Albert's test: a neglected test of perceptual neglect. Lancet 1986; i: 430–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55Albert, ML. A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 1973; 23: 658–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Halligan, PW, Marshall, JC, Wade, DT. Visuospatial neglect: underlying factors and test specificity. Lancet 1989; ii: 908–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57Young, GC, Collins, D, Hren, M. Effect of paired scanning training with block design in the remediation of perceptual problems in left hemiplegics. J Clin Neuropsychology 1983; 5: 201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58McSherry, D, Fullerton, K. Preceptor: a shell for medical expert systems and its applications in a study of prognostic indices in stroke. Expert Systems 1985; 2: 140–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59Schenkenberg, T, Bradford, DC, Ajax, ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology 1980; 30: 509–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60Heilman, KM, Pandya, DN, Geschwind, N. Trimodal inattention following parietal lobe ablations. Trans Am Neural Assoc 1970; 95: 259–61.Google ScholarPubMed
61Bisiach, E, Luzzatti, C. Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex 1978; 14: 129–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62Anton, HA, Herschler, C, Lloyd, P, Murray, D. Visual neglect and extinction: a new test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 1013–16.Google ScholarPubMed
63Whiting, SE, Lincoln, NB, Bhavnani, G, Cockburn, J. The Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery. Windsor: NFER-Nelson, 1985.Google Scholar
64Bhavnani, G, Cockburn, J, Whiting, S, Lincoln, N. The reliability of the Rivermead Perceptual Assessment. Occupational Therapy 1983; 1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65Wilson, B, Cockburn, J, Halligan, P. Development of a behavioural test of visuospatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 98102.Google Scholar
66Edmans, JA, Lincoln, NB. The frequency of perceptual deficits after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 1987; 1: 273–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67Cutting, J. Study of anosognosia. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978; 41: 548–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68Weinstein, EA, Cole, M, Mitchell, MS, Lyerly, OG. Anosognosia and aphasia. Arch Neurol 1964; 10: 376–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69Critchley, M. Misoplegia or hatred of hemiplegia. In: Critchley, M ed. The divine banquet of the brain. New York: Raven Press, 1979: 115–21.Google Scholar
70Weinberg, J, Diller, L, Gordon, WA et al. Visual scanning training effect on reading related tasks in acquired right brain damage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1977; 58: 479–86.Google ScholarPubMed
71Campbell, J, Tallis, R. Contingency transcutaneous stimulator for patients with unilateral tactile and proprioceptive neglect. Med Biol Eng Comput 1985; 23: 9092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72Carr, EK, Hawthorn, PJ. Observation of eating skills after stroke: dribbling food and chewing. Clinical Rehabilitation 1988; 2: 183–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73Veis, SL, Logemann, JA. Swallowing disorders in persons with cerebrovascular accident. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66: 372–75.Google ScholarPubMed
74Brocklehurst, JC, Andrews, K, Richards, B, Laycock, PJ. Incidence and correlates of incontinence in stroke patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985; 33: 540–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75Currie, CT. Urinary incontinence after stroke. Br Med J 1986; 293: 1322–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76Kertesz, A. Aphasia. In: Fredericks, JAM ed. Handbook of clinical neurology, Volume 1. New York: Elsevier, 1985: 45.Google Scholar
77Enderby, PM, Wood, VA, Wade, DT, Langton, Hewer R. The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int Rehabil Med 1987; 8: 166–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78Enderby, P, Wood, VA, Wade, DT, Langton, Hewer R. Aphasia after stroke: a detailed study of recovery in the first 3 months. Int Rehabil Med 1987; 8: 162–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
79O'Neill, P, Cheadle, B, Wyatt, R, McGuffog, J, Fullerton, KJ. Evaluation of the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test in screening for dysphasia: better than the clinician? Clinical Rehabilitation 1990; 4: 123–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
80Wade, DT, Langton, Hewer R, David, RM, Enderby, PM. Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986; 49: 1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
81David, R, Enderby, P, Bainton, D. Treatment of acquired aphasia: speech therapists and volunteers compared. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1982; 45: 957–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
82Eaton, Griffith V, Miller, CL. Volunteer stroke scheme for patients with stroke. Br Med J 1980; 281: 1605–607.Google Scholar
83Eaton, Griffith V. Observations on patients dysphasic after stroke. Br Med J 1980; 281: 1608–609.Google Scholar
84Robinson, RG, Bolduc, PL, Price, TR. Two year longitudinal study of poststroke mood disorders: diagnosis and outcome at one and two years. Stroke 1987; 18: 837–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
85House, A, Dennis, M, Molyneux, A, Warlow, C, Hawton, K. Emotionalism after stroke. Br Med J 1989; 298: 991–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
86Wade, DT, Parker, V, Langton, Hewer R. Memory disturbance after stroke: frequency and associated losses. Int Rehabil Med 1986; 8: 6064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
87Hodkinson, HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing 1972; 1: 233–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
88Mahoney, FI, Barthel, DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md Med J 1965; 14: 6165.Google ScholarPubMed
89Wade, DT, Legh-Smith, J, Langton, Hewer R. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med 1985; 7: 176–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
90Affleck, JW, Aitken, RGB, Hunter, JAA, McGuire, RJ, Roy, CW. Rehabilitation status: a measure of medicosocial dysfunction. Lancet 1988; i: 230–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
91Hebert, R, Carrier, R, Bilodeau, A. The functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF): description and validation of a system for the measurement of handicaps. Age Ageing 1988; 17: 293302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92Wade, DT, Legh-Smith, J, Langton, Hewer R. Effects of living with and looking after survivors of a stroke. Br Med J 1986; 293: 416–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
93Carnwarth, TCM, Johnson, DAW. Psychiatric morbidity among spouses of patients with stroke. Br Med J 1987; 294: 409–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
94Andrews, K, Stewart, J. Stroke recovery: he can but does he? Rheumatol Rehabil 1978; 18: 4348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
95Ebrahim, S, Barer, D, Nouri, F. An audit of follow up services for stroke patients after discharge from hospital. Int Disabil Studies 1987; 9: 103105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Rehabilitation in stroke
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Rehabilitation in stroke
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Rehabilitation in stroke
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *