No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The President's Image as Diplomat in Chief
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2009
Abstract
This article describes and analyzes a number of complications involved in presidential image identification and assessment (including distinctions among the various categories of summit diplomacy), selected images of past presidents, the role of the media, opinion polls, and surveys of “experts” in reflecting presidential images and prestige, and more precisely the president's image as diplomat in chief. Included are a description of the fluctuation in individual president's popularity ratings as related to selected foreign relations events, a comparative table of high, low, and average popular approval ratings for recent presidents beginning with Franklin Roosevelt, a comparative table of superior presidential rankings by “experts” throughout our history, and a table, with commentary, of presidential popular rating shifts following major summit ventures of the president since 1941. This article constitutes an introductory macro-treatment of the generalized aggregate of contemporary and historical perceptions of the president as diplomat in chief.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1985
References
Notes
1 Rossiter, Clinton L., The American Presidency, 2nd ed. (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1960), p. 92.Google Scholar
2 For example, see Bell, Jack, The Presidency: Office of Power (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1967), pp. 10–11Google Scholar; and Koenig, Louis W., The Chief Executive, 2nd ed. (New York: Harcourt and Brace, 1968), pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
3 Bailey, Thomas A., Presidential Greatness: The Image of the Man from Washington to the Present (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966), p. 268.Google Scholar
4 For a comparison of Gallup and Roper rating systems, see Roper, Burns, “Presidential Popularity: Do People Like the Actor or His Actions?” Public Opinion, American Enterprise Institute (10/11 1983), pp. 42–44.Google Scholar
For an interesting comparison of popular polls, taken in 1956 and 1976 by the Gallup organization, to ascertain public views of the greatest American presidents, see Bailey, , Presidential Greatness, pp. 21–22Google Scholar for 1956 results, and for 1976 results see The Gallup Polls: Public Opinion, 1972–1977 (Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources, 1978), vol. 2, p. 641.Google Scholar
5 Compiled from The Gallup Opinion Index, 10–11, 1980Google Scholar, and The Gallup Report, updated by the American Enterprise Institute for the Reagan administration. The following survey is based on these resources.
6 Compiled from Tables 2, 3, and 7 in Garry M. Maranell, “The Evaluation of Presidents: An Extension of the Schlesinger Polls,” Journal of American History, 57 (June 1970), 107–108, and 111 This is also excerpted in “The Office Filled,” chapter 17 in Mary Klein, ed., The Presidency: The Power and the Glory (Minneapolis: Winston, 1973), pp. 142–45. Also see Gary M. Maranell and Richard Dodder, “Political Orientation and Evaluation of Presidential Prestige: A Study of American Historians,” Social Science Quarterly, 51 (September 1970), 415–21.
For other polls by experts, largely historians and political scientists — which rate the greatest or strongest presidents — see Schlesinger, Arthur M. Sr., “The U.S. Presidents,” Life, 1 11 1948, pp. 65, 67, 73–74Google Scholar, and “Our Presidents: A Rating by 75 Historians,” New York Times Magazine, 29 07 1962, p. 12 ff.Google Scholar; poll of 50 historians and political scientists in Chicago Tribune Magazine, 10 01 1982, p. 9Google Scholar; and Murray, Robert K. and Blessing, Tim H., “The Presidential Performance Study: A Progress Report,” Journal of American History, 70 (12 1983), 535–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For an analysis of the Murray-Blessing survey, see Hoff, Samuel B., “Power, Performance, and Political Bases of Presidential Rankings” (Paper presented at 1985 Annual Meeting of the Pennsylvania Political Science Association).Google Scholar
7 Wilson, Woodrow, Constitutional Government in the United States (New York: Columbia University Press, 1908), p. 77.Google Scholar
8 Laski, Harold J., The American Presidency: An Interpretation (New York: Harper, 1940), pp. 3 and 26.Google Scholar
9 McConnell, Grant, The Modern Presidency, 2nd ed. (New York: St. Martin's, 1977), p. 14.Google Scholar
10 Rossiter, Clinton L., “The Presidency —Focus of Leadership,” New York Times, 11 11 1956, p. 9.Google Scholar
11 For Truman-Stalin, Eisenhower, and Kennedy polls, see The Gallup Polls: Public Opinion, 1935–1971 (New York: Random House, 1972), vol. 2, pp. 944, 1136, 1182, 1348, and 1550, and vol. 3, p. 1703Google Scholar; for Nixon poll, see The Gallup Polls: Public Opinion, 1972–1977, vol. 2, p. 20.Google Scholar
12 McConnell, , Modern Presidency, p. 82.Google Scholar
13 “Special Issue: The Presidency,” Life, 5 07 1968, p. 4.Google Scholar
14 Hughes, Emmet John, The Ordeal of Power: A Political Memoir of the Eisenhower Years (New York: Atheneum, 1963), p. 350.Google Scholar
15 Geyelin, Philip, Lyndon B. Johnson and the World (New York: Praeger, 1966), p. 232.Google Scholar
16 Kissinger, Henry A., Years of Upheaval (Boston: Little Brown, 1982), p. 414.Google Scholar
17 Brzezinski, Zbigniew, Power and Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Adviser, 1977–1981 (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1983), p. 520.Google Scholar
18 Kissinger, Henry A., Years of Upheaval, pp. 1208–1209.Google Scholar