Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:14:06.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The economic opportunities for increasing the use of forage legumes in north European livestock systems under both conventional and organic management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

C.J. Doyle*
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr, KA6 5HW, UK.
C.F.E. Topp
Affiliation:
Land Economy, Research Division, The Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK.
*
*Corresponding author: K.Topp@ed.sac.ac.uk

Abstract

Changing from a conventional livestock production system, based on fertilized grass swards, to an organic management system requires the establishment of legume-based swards to replace the purchased fertilizer nitrogen. This paper reviews experimental-based research on both the comparative economics of legume-based systems and grass swards and also the economic advantage that forage legumes confer on organic systems. A methodology to determine the production costs and economic values of a variety of forage legume systems is outlined. The resultant methodology is then applied to experimental results from trials, conducted at a wide range of sites in northern Europe, to determine the comparative profitability of different legume-based systems of silage production under conventional management. The results indicate that potentially red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), and to a lesser extent white clover (Trifolium repens L.), and lucerne (alfalfa) (Medicago sativa L.), can produce higher profits per hectare than grass-based systems using high levels of nitrogen fertilizer. Galega (Galega orientalis Lam) and lotus (Lotus corniculatus L.) can, in certain circumstances, be economically competitive with fertilized grass swards, but would generally not be the forage legumes of first choice. From an economic standpoint, forage legumes are probably best grown in a mixture with grass. As some of the experimental sites involved organic treatments, the analysis has been extended to include an assessment of the comparative economics of organic systems of production based on forage legumes, relative to conventional grass-based systems. Thus, the third part of the paper is concerned with quantifying the economic advantage to organic systems conferred by forage legumes. The results indicate that, under careful management, their use for silage can produce higher profits per hectare for organic dairy systems than those obtained from conventional grass-based systems. While the relative performance of organic systems is strongly influenced by the price premium paid for organic milk, which has declined in recent years, not all the projected economic advantage of legume-based organic dairy systems is eroded by this trend. However, economic advantage is not enough to secure the widespread adoption of forage legumes. This will depend on technological developments and management practices which reduce the risks associated with both more difficult crop establishment and higher nitrate leaching of forage legumes as compared to grass swards.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Wilkins, R.J. and Paul, C. (eds) 2002. Legumes Silages for Animal Production–LEGSIL, Landbauforschung Volkenrode Sonderheft. FAL Agricultural Research, Braunschweig, Germany.Google Scholar
2Halling, M.A., Hopkins, A., Nissinen, O., Paul, C., Tuori, M., and Soelter, U. 2001. Forage legumes–productivity and composition. In Wilkins, R.J., Paul, C. (eds). Legumes Silages for Animal Production–LEGSIL. Landbauforschung Volkenrode Sonderheft 234:515.Google Scholar
3Doyle, C.J. and Topp, C.F.E. 2002. An economic assessment of the potential for increasing the use of forage legumes in north European livestock systems. In Wilkins, R.J. (ed.). Low-input Animal Production Based on Forage Legumes for Silage (LEGSIL), Final Report to the European Union. Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Okehampton, UK. p. 231350.Google Scholar
4Bertilsson, J., Dewhurst, R.J., and Tuori, M. 2001. Effects of legume silages on feed intake, milk production and nitrogen efficiency. In Wilkins, R.J. and Paul, C. (eds). Legumes Silages for Animal Production–LEGSIL. Landbauforschung Volkenrode Sonderheft 234:3953.Google Scholar
5Halling, M.A., Scholefield, D., Wilkins, R.J., Bowling, P.J., Hakkola, H., Hopkins, A., Paul, C., Soelter, U., and Tuori, M. 2001. Herbage production and nitrate leaching from forage legumes grown in ‘organic’ conditions in northern Europe. In Isselstein, J., Spaty, G. and Hofmann, M. (eds). Organic Grassland Farming. Proceedings of the International Occasional Symposium of the European Grassland Federation at Witgenhausen, Germany, 10–12 July 2001. Grassland Science in Europe 6:8285.Google Scholar
6Doyle, C.J. and Topp, C.F.E. 2002. Milk from grass: an economic assessment of the potential of forage legumes for silage production in northern Europe. In Durand, J.L., Emile, J.C., Huyghe, C., and Lemaire, G. (eds). Multi-Function Grasslands: Quality Forages, Animal Products and Landscapes. Proceedings of 19th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation at La Rochelle, France, 27–30 May 2002. Grassland Science in Europe 7:10901091.Google Scholar
7Doyle, C.J. and Topp, C.F.E. 2002. Potential economic gains from using forage legumes in organic livestock systems in northern Europe. In Proceedings of UK Organic Research 2002 Conference. p. 195196.Google Scholar