Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:30:15.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Britannia, Ralph Brooke, and the Representation of Privilege in Elizabethan England*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

William Rockett*
Affiliation:
University of Oregon

Abstract

The fourth edition of Britannia (1594) contained a marked increase in the representation of the propertied classes. The names of landowners, new families as well as old, were increased by approximately three hundred over the third edition of 1590. The fourth edition also contained a new index — “Barones et lllustriores Familiae” — which, together with the new names, registered first Camden's awareness of the changing character of Elizabethan society and second his qualifications as heraldic historian. The significance of this is not entirely clear until it is seen that the changes in Britannia came at a time of controversy and declining esteem in the College of Arms. Camden's authority in heraldry, of which the 1594 Britannia provided convincing evidence, together with his association with the advocates of armorial reform (Fulke Greville, Sir Edward Hoby, and Baron Burghley as well as the queen) made him a logical choice, over Ralph Brooke, for elevation to Clarenceux King of Arms in October 1597. Brooke's quarrel with Camden was part and parcel of the College's troubles and was seen at the time as an instance of the jealous animosity for which Brooke was notorious. One of the ironies of Brooke's attack is that it was symptomatic of the conditions — rivalries and jurisdictional disputes among the heralds, for instance — that advocates of reform were attempting to remedy.

Type
Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anstis, John. 1724. A Discoverie of Certaine Errours published in print in the much commended Britannia, 1594… by Ralph Brooke, Yorke Herault at Armes … To which are added, The Learned Mr. Camden's Answer to this book; and Mr. Brooke's Reply, now first published from an original manuscript in the library of John Anstis, Esq; Garter King at Arms. London.Google Scholar
Beckingsale, B. W. 1967. Burghley: Tudor Statesman, 1520-1598. London.10.1007/978-1-349-00312-9Google Scholar
Bernard, G. W. 1985. The Power of the Early Tudor Nobility. Sussex.Google Scholar
Berry, Elizabeth. 1965. Henry Ferrers: An Early Warwickshire Antiquary, 1550-1633. Oxford.Google Scholar
Black's Law Dictionary. 1990. 6th ed. St. Paul.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1982. Commentaries on the Laws of England. 1809. Abingdon.Google Scholar
Brooke, Ralph. 1619. A Catalogue and Succession of the Kings, Princes, Dukes, Earles, and Viscounts of this realme. Discovering, and Reforming many errors. London.Google Scholar
Calendar of State Papers, Domestic, 1591-1594. 1864. London.Google Scholar
Camden, William. 1594. Britannia. London.Google Scholar
Camden, William. 1600. Britannia. London.Google Scholar
Carew, Richard. 1953. Survey of Cornwall. Ed. E E. Halliday. London.Google Scholar
Clay, C. G. A. 1984. Economic Expansion and Social Change: England 1500-1700. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511608018Google Scholar
Coke, Edward. 1832. The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England. 1628. London.Google Scholar
Coss, P. R. 1995. “The Formation of the English Gentry.” Past and Present 147 (May): 3864.Google Scholar
Dean, David. 1995. “Image and Ritual in the Tudor Parliaments.” In Tudor Political Culture, ed. David Hoak, 243-71. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Douglas, David C. 1964. William the Conqeror: The Norman Impact upon England. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ellis, Henry, ed. 1849. Visitation of the County of Huntingdon. Camden Society.Google Scholar
Erdeswicke, Sampson. 1820. Survey of Staffordshire. Ed. Thomas Harwood. Westminster.Google Scholar
Flower, Robin. 1935. “Laurence Nowell and the Discovery of England in Tudor Times.Proceedings of the British Academy 21: 4774.Google Scholar
Friedman, Alice T. 1989. House and Household in Elizabethan England: Wollaton Hall and the Willoughby Family. Chicago.Google Scholar
Given-Wilson, Chris. 1987. The English Nobility in the late Middle Ages. London.10.4324/9780203441268Google Scholar
Gough, Richard, trans. 1806. Britannia. 4 vols. London.Google Scholar
Guillim, John. 1610. A Display of Heraldrie. London.Google Scholar
Gunn, S. J. 1988. Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk c. 1484-1545. Oxford.Google Scholar
Guy, John. 1988. Tudor England. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, William. 1587. Description of England. London.Google Scholar
Hearne, Thomas, ed. 1771. A Collection of Curious Discourses written by Eminent Antiquaries. 2 vols. London.Google Scholar
Hoyle, R. W. 1990. “Tenure and the Land Market in early modern England: or a late Contribution to the Brenner Debate.Economic History Review 43: 120.Google Scholar
Kendrick, T. D. 1950. British Antiquity. London.Google Scholar
Lambarde, William. 1576. A Perambulation of Kent: containing the description, hystorie, and customes of that shyre. Collected and written (for the most part) in the yeare. 1570. By William Lambarde. London.Google Scholar
Leigh, Gerard. 1597. The Accedence of Armorie. London.Google Scholar
Manwood, John. 1598. A Treatise of the Forest Laws. London.Google Scholar
Mingay, G. E. 1976. The Gentry: The Rise and Fall of a Ruling Class. London.Google Scholar
Noble, Mark. 1805. A History of the College of Arms. London.Google Scholar
Norden, John. 1607. A Description of the Honor of Windsor. BM Harl. 3749.Google Scholar
Norden, John. 1593. Speculum Britanniae The first parte: an historicall and chorographicall description of Middlesex. London.Google Scholar
Norden, John. 1607. The Surveiors Dialogue. London.Google Scholar
Pulman, Michael B. 1971. The Elizabethan Privy Council in the Fifteen-Seventies. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Rockett, William. 1995. “The Structural Plan of Camden's Britannia .” Sixteenth Century Journal 26: 829-41.Google Scholar
Rowse, A. L. 1951. The England of Elizabeth. London.Google Scholar
Selden, John. 1614. Titles of Honor. London.Google Scholar
Segar, William. 1590. The Booke of Honor and Armes. London.Google Scholar
Smith, Thomas. 1583. De republica Anglorum. London.Google Scholar
Smith, Thomas. 1691. Gulielmi Camdeni et illustrium virorum ad G. Camdenum Epistolae. London.Google Scholar
Speed, John. 1611. The Theatre of the Empire of Great Britaine. London.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. 1965. The Crisis of the Aristocracy, 1558-1641. Oxford.Google Scholar
Strong, Roy. 1977. Cult of Elizabeth. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Styles, Philip. 1953. “The Heralds’ Visitation of Warwickshire, 1682-3.” Transactions of the Birmingham Archaeological Society 71: 96134.Google Scholar
Tenison, E. M. 1956. Elizabethan England: being the History of this Country in Relation to all Foreign Princes. 12 vols. Leamington Spa, Warwickshire.Google Scholar
Thynne, Francis. 1771. “A Discourse of the Duty and Office of an Herald of Arms.” In A Collection of Curious Discourses written by Eminent Antiquaries, ed. Thomas Hearne, 2:139-59. London.Google Scholar
Vincent, Augustine. 1622. A Discoverie of Errovrs in the First Edition of the Catalogue of Nobility, published by Raphe Brooke, Yorke Herald, 1616. London.Google Scholar
Wagner, Anthony. 1939. Heralds and Heraldry in the Middle Ages. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wagner, Anthony. 1967. Heralds of England: A History of the Office and College of Arms. London.Google Scholar
Westcote, Thomas. 1845. A View of Devonshire in MDCXXX, with a Pedigree of Most of its Gentry. Ed. George Oliver and Pitman Jones. Exeter: William Roberts.Google Scholar
Whigham, Frank. 1984. Ambition and Privilege: The Social Tropes of Elizabethan Courtesy Theory. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Woodcock, Thomas, and John Martin, Robinson. 1988. The Oxford Guide to Heraldry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Youings, Joyce. 1984. Sixteenth-Century England. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar