Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T18:47:08.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cristoforo Landino and Coluccio Salutati on the Best Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Bruce G. McNair*
Affiliation:
Campbell University

Extract

An Important Issue in the study of fifteenth-century Florentine humanism is whether or not later Quattrocento humanists advocate a withdrawal from public life and abandon the “civic” humanism of Salutati, Bruni, and the early Quattrocento humanists. There is no lack of studies on this question using the categories of vita activa and vita contemplativa. In broad terms, the early fifteenthcentury Florentine humanists, reacting against the medieval scholastic world view, are seen as advocating the supremacy of the vita activa though still valuing the vita contemplativa, while the midfifteenth- century humanists, under the influence of the Medici and Marsilio Ficino's Platonic studies, are considered to have reversed the earlier emphasis on the “civic” outlook for the supremacy of the contemplative life and a withdrawal from public affairs.

Type
Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliograph

Baron, Hans. “Cicero and the Roman Civic Spirit in the Middle Ages and the Early Renaissance.Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 12 (1938): 72-91. Revised by Baron as “The Memory of Cicero's Roman Civic Spirit in the Medieval Centuries and in the Florentine Renaissance.” In his In Search of Florentine Civic Humanism, Essays on the Transition from Medieval to Modern Thought 1:94133. Princeton, 1988.Google Scholar
Baron, Hans Leonardo Bmni Aretino: Humanistisch- Philosophische Schriften mit einer Chronologic seiner Werke nnd Briefe. Leipzig, 1928; rpt. Weisbaden. 1969.Google Scholar
Bonnell, Robert. “An Early Humanistic View of the Active and Contemplative Life.” Italica 43 (1966): 225-39.Google Scholar
Brown, Alison. “Platonism in Fifteenth- Century Florence and Its Contribution to Early Modern Political Thought.“ Journal of Modern History 58 (June 1966): 383413.Google Scholar
Brucker, Gene. Renaissance Florence. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1969.Google Scholar
Cardini, Roberto. La Critica del Landino. Florence, 1973.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, Krisreller, Paul O. and Randall, John H. Jr. eds. The Renaissance Philosophy of Man. Chicago and London, 1948 Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Opera Omnia. Basle, 1561; rpt. Turin, 1962.Google Scholar
Marsilio, Ficino. The Philebus Commentary. Ed. and trans. Allen, Michael J. B.. Berkeley, 1975.Google Scholar
Field, Arthur. The Origins of the Platonic Academy of Florence. Princeton, 1988.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. L'Umanesimo Italiano: filoso-fia e vita civile nel Rinascimento. 2d ed. Bari, 1958.Google Scholar
Mirandola, Giovanni Pico della. De dignitate hominis. In Respnblica Literaria, 1, ed. and tr. Eugenio Garin, 26-85. Berlin and Zurich, 1968.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G., J., Hankins, and Thompson, D.. The Humanism of Leonardo Bmni, Selected Texts. The Renaissance Society of America, Renaissance Texts Series, 10. Bingham ton, NY, 1987.Google Scholar
Hankins, James. “The Myth of the Platonic Academy of Florence.” Renaissance Quarterly 44 (1991): 429-75.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. “Coluccio Salutati on the Active and Contemplative Lives.” In Arbeit Mnsse Meditation, ed. Vickers, Brian, 153-79. Zurich. 1985.Google Scholar
Kallendorf, Craig. “Cristoforo Landino's Aeneid and the Humanist Critical Tradition.“ Renaissance Quarterly 36 (1983): 519-46.Google Scholar
Kallendorf, Craig. In Praise of Aeneas: Virgil and Epidcictic Rhetoric in the Early Italian Renaissance. Hanover and London, 1989.Google Scholar
Kessler, Eckhard. Das Problem des frühen Humanists, seine philosophische Bedeutung bei Coluccio Salutati. Munich, 1968.Google Scholar
Kohl, Benjamin, and Witt, Ronald, ed. The Earthly Republic: Italian Humanists on Government and Society. Philadelphia. 1978.Google Scholar
Krisreller, Paul Oskar. “The Active and Contemplative Life in Renaissance Humanism.“ In Arbeit Musse Meditation, ed. Vickers, Brian. 133-52. Zurich, 1985.Google Scholar
Landino, Cristoforo. Disputationes Camaldn-lenses. Ed. Lohe, Peter. Florence, 1980.Google Scholar
Lentzen, Manfred. Studien zur Dante-Exegese Cristoforo Landines: Mit einem Anhang bisher unveröffemtlichter Briefe und Reden. Cologne and Vienna, 1971.Google Scholar
Marsh, David. The Quattrocento Dialogue: Classical Tradition and Humanist Innovation. Cambridge. MA, 1980.Google Scholar
Martines, Lauro. The Social World of the Florentine Humanists 1390-1460. Princeton, 1963.Google Scholar
McNair, Bruce. “Cristoforo Landino on the Human Soul: The Disputationes Camaldu-lenses and De anima. ” Ph.D. diss., Duke University, 1991.Google Scholar
McNair, Bruce. “Cristoforo Landino's Use of Albert on the Soul.” The Modern Schoolman 70 (1993): 115-29.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, Mehus. Leouardi Bruni Arretini Epistolamm Libri VIII. 2 vols. Florence, 1741.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel. Pastoral and Ideology: Virgil to Valéry. Berkeley, 1988.Google Scholar
Rabil, Albert Jr., “The Significance of 'Civic Humanism’ in the Interpretation of the Italian Renaissance.” In Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms, and Legacy, ed. Rabil, Albert Jr., 1:141-74. Philadelphia, 1988.Google Scholar
Rabil, Albert Jr., ed. Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms, and Legacy. 3 vols. Philadelphia, 1988.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Leighton. Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford, 1983.Google Scholar
Salutati, Coluccio. Epistolario di Coluccio Salutati. Ed. Novati, Francesco. Rome, 1896.Google Scholar
Salutati, Coluccio. De nohilitate legum et medicinae. De verecundia. Ed. Garin, Eugenio. Florence, 1947.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Volume One: The Renaissance. Cambridge and New York, 1978.Google Scholar
Stinger, Charles. “Humanism in Florence.“ In Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms, and Legacy, ed. Rabil, Albert Jr., 1: 175208.Google Scholar
Thomas, Aquinas. Summa Theologiae. Vol. 3, Opera Omnia. Parma, 1852-55; rpt. New York, 1948.Google Scholar
Thomas, Aquinas Summa Theologica. Vol. 2. New York, 1947.Google Scholar
John, Tinkler. “Renaissance Humanism and the Genera Eloquentiae.Rhetorica 5 (1987): 279309.Google Scholar
Trinkhaus, Charles. In Our Image and Likeness: Humanity and Divinity in Italian Humanist Thought. 2 vols. London, 1970.Google Scholar
Tugwell, Simon. Albert and Thomas, Selected Writings. New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. “Leisure and Idleness in the Renaissance: The Ambivalence of Otium. Renaissance Studies 4 (1990): 1-37 and 4 (1990): 107-54.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian, ed. Arbeit Musse Meditation: Betrachtungen zur Vita activa und Vita contemplative!. Zurich, 1985.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, James B. “Landino's Camaldulenscs, Ficino's De Felicitate, and L'Altercazione of Lorenzo De’ Medici.” Modern Philology 50 (1952): 2331.Google Scholar
Witt, Ronald G. Hercules at the Crossroads: The Life, Works, and Thought of Coluccio Salutati. Durham, NC, 1983.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eugene. “Die allegorische Vergilerklärung des Cristoforo Landino.Neue Jahrbücher für klassischc Altcrtum Geschichte und deutsche Literatur 43 (1919): 453-79.Google Scholar