Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T11:37:53.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Newman on emotion and cognition in the Grammar of Assent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2023

Emma Emrich*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Fordham University, New York, USA

Abstract

This article considers the role of emotion in John Henry Newman's Grammar of Assent by distinguishing five different ways (or ‘models’) in which the emotions play a positive epistemic role in relation to cognition. The most important of these, the Cognitive-Emotion Model, offers a new account of Newman's crucial idea of real assent, one that stresses the primary role of the emotions in real assent rather than imagination. This model helps to explain the nature of real assent by highlighting Newman's portrayal of an emotional way of knowing an object that is personal or individual, incommunicable, vivid, and motive. In this study of the relations between emotion and cognition I hope to highlight unexplored aspects of the nature of real assent and the importance of the role of emotion in it and hope to show how Newman's epistemology offers a rich framework for exploring the positive epistemic contributions of the emotions.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquino, FD and Gage, LP (2020) On the epistemic role of our passional nature. Newman Studies Journal 17, 4158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, M (2016) Emotional Insight: The Epistemic Role of Emotional Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coulson, J (1981) Religion and Imagination: In Aid of a Grammar of Assent. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
De Sousa, R (2001) Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dive, B (2018) John Henry Newman and the Imagination. New York: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Goldie, P (2000) The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goldie, P (2004) Emotion, feeling, and knowledge of the world. In Solomon, RC (ed.), Thinking About Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 91106.Google Scholar
Holyer, R (1986) Religious certainty and the imagination: an interpretation of J. H. Newman. The Thomist 50, 395416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, E (2021) Belief, faith, and hope: on the rationality of long-term commitment. Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 130, 3557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, J (1979) Newman on love as the safeguard of faith. Scottish Journal of Theology 32, 139150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, JH (1979) An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Newman, JH (2006) Sermon XIII: Implicit and Explicit Reason. In Earnest JD and Tracey G (eds), Fifteen Sermons Preached before the University of Oxford. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 173190.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, MC (2001) Upheavals of Thoughts: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarantino, A and De Sousa, R (2021) Emotion. In Zalta, EN (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition).Google Scholar
Solomon, RC (1993) The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Szydlik, T (2019) Imagination and belief – Newman's contribution to the new evangelization. The Person and the Challenges: The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II 9, 165182.Google Scholar
Wainwright, WJ (1995) Reason and the Heart: A Prolegomenon to a Critique of Passional Reason. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wynn, M (2005) The relationship of religion and ethics: a comparison of Newman and contemporary philosophy of religion. The Heythrop Journal 46, 435449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar