Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T08:52:39.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In defence of God making stuff up: a reply to Ward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2023

Paul M. Gould*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy of Religion, Palm Beach Atlantic University, West Palm Beach, FL, USA

Abstract

Thomas Ward explicates and defends a version of divine exemplarism called Containment Exemplarism to make good on the claim that God is a ‘totally original artist’. According to Containment Exemplarism, (i) God ex nihilo creates according to divine ideas, (ii) divine ideas are about an aspect or part of God, and (iii) God has the ideas he has by knowing himself. Containment Exemplarism, we are told, secures the rationality and creativity of the divine creative act. I argue, first, that Ward's God is not a totally original artist since, on Containment Exemplarism, God does not act creatively in creating. Theistic Activism, the view that God makes up the ideas he has, can secure the creativity of the divine creative act. I argue, second, that Ward's argument against the rationality of God making stuff up fails. Thus, there is one version of divine exemplarism that satisfies key desiderata for divine creation.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boden, MA (2004) The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaut, B (2010) The philosophy of creativity. Philosophy Compass 5, 10341166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaut, B (2012) Creativity and rationality. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70, 259335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, PM (2014) Theistic activism and the doctrine of creation. Philosophia Christi 16, 283296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, PM (2022) Christian metaphysics and platonism. In Mosteller, TM (ed.), Four Views on Christian Metaphysics. Eugene, OR: Cascade, pp. 134.Google Scholar
Gould, PM and Davis, RB (eds) (2014) Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Jacobs, JD (2010) A powers theory of modality: or, how I learned to stop worrying and reject possible worlds. Philosophical Studies 151, 227248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, A (2022) Imagination and Creativity Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraay, KJ (2008) Creation, actualization and God's choice among possible worlds. Philosophy Compass 3, 854872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, B (2012) God and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, AO (1936) The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, HJ (2012) Creation and the Sovereignty of God. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, TV and Menzel, C (1986) Absolute creation. American Philosophical Quarterly 23, 353362.Google Scholar
Page, MD (2022) Creativity in creation. In Buchak, L and Zimmerman, DW (eds), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, vol. 10. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 120144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, A (1992) Augustinian Christian philosophy. The Monist 75, 291320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarry, E (1999) On Beauty and Being Just. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopenhauer, S (1969) The World as Will and Representation, vol. 1. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Stokes, D (2016) Imagination and creativity. In Kind, A (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination. New York: Routledge, pp. 247261.Google Scholar
Ward, TM (2020) Divine Ideas. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessling, J (2020) Love Divine: A Systematic Account of God's Love for Humanity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, R (1974) On drawing an object. In On Art and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 330.Google Scholar