Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-97jns Total loading time: 0.175 Render date: 2021-09-25T03:40:12.000Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

Videoconferencing and the networked provision of language programs in regional and rural schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2018

Yvette Slaughter
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Australia (ymslau@unimelb.edu.au)
Wally Smith
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Australia (wsmith@unimelb.edu.au)
John Hajek
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Australia (j.hajek@unimelb.edu.au)

Abstract

The use of videoconferencing technology to support the delivery of language programs shows great potential in regional and rural settings where a lack of access to specialist teachers limits equitable access to education. In this article, we investigate the establishment of two regional and rural primary school networks in Australia for videoconferenced language learning. Adopting a perspective taken from the discipline of information systems called structuration theory, we examine how the technology they use both changes and is changed by its use in language learning, and how schools and teachers take control of technology and adapt their educational approaches. Case studies were carried out on the two networks using multiple data sources, including interviews and observation of language classes. The findings reveal that even with the same conceptual foundations and aims, divergent models of practice emerge as sustainable adaptations to localised factors. These differences are shaped by, among other things, an interplay between the quality of infrastructure, prior knowledge, and the “material properties” of the technology, including its functions, limits, and deployment in physical space. A closer look at these practices illustrates limitations and possibilities specifically for language education, but also more broadly illustrates how the success of these videoconferencing initiatives are influenced by a nuanced combination of social, educational, and technological factors.

Type
Regular papers
Copyright
© European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anastasiades, P. S., Filippousis, G., Karvunis, L., Siakas, S., Tomazinakis, A., Giza, P. Mastoraki, H. (2010) Interactive videoconferencing for collaborative learning at a distance in the school of 21st century: A case study in elementary schools in Greece. Computers & Education 54(2), 321339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, N., Hampel, R. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2017) Video conferencing and multimodal expression of voice: Children’s conversations using Skype for second language development in a telecollaborative setting. System 64, 87103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Codreanu, T. Celik, C. C. (2013) Effects of webcams on multimodal interactive learning. ReCALL 25(1), 3047. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comber, C. Lawson, T. (2013) Sustaining technological innovation: The example of videoconferencing in English Schools. Education and Information Technologies 18(4), 641659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9193-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (2014) School policy and advisory guide: Internet services. http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/principals/spag/infrastructure/pages/internet.aspx Google Scholar
DeSanctis, G. Poole, M. S. (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science 5(2), 121147. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, N. (2009) Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal 93(Suppl. 1), 719740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00969.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guichon, N. Cohen, C. (2014) The impact of the webcam on an online L2 interaction. The Canadian Modern Language Review 70(3), 331354. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R. Stickler, U. (2012) The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL 24(2), 116137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200002X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinhenz, E., Wilkinson, J., Gearon, M., Fernandez, S. Ingvarson, L. (2007) The review of teacher education for languages teachers: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
Kling, R. (1980) Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. Computing Surveys, 12(1), 61110. https://doi.org/10.1145/356802.356806 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, P. M. Barley, S. R. (2010) What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. The Academy of Management Annals 4(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416521003654160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A. Kallinikos, J. (eds.) (2012) Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664054.001.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombard, M. Ditton, T. (1997) At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x Google Scholar
Luoto, I. (2007) Evaluation of the MustLearnIT project: Using ICT for special subject distance learning in multigrade schools. Jyväskylä: The University of Jyväskylä. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-2972-5 Google Scholar
Macrory, G., Chrétien, L. Ortega-Martín, J. L. (2012) Technologically enhanced language learning in primary schools in England, France and Spain: Developing linguistic competence in a technologically enhanced classroom environment. Education 3-13 40(4), 433444. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.691376 Google Scholar
Moore, M. G. (1993) Theory of transactional distance. In Keegan D (ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. New York: Routledge, 2238.Google Scholar
Norris, L. Coutas, P. (2014) Cinderella’s coach or just another pumpkin? Information communication technologies and the continuing marginalisation of languages in Australian schools. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 37(1), 4361. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.37.1.03nor CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2015) The competences of the telecollaborative teacher. The Language Learning Journal 43(2), 194207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.853374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007) Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies 28(9), 14351448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Örnberg Berglund, T. (2009) Multimodal student interaction online: An ecological perspective. ReCALL 21(2), 186205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, A., Hunt, M. Barnes, A. (2010) Case study investigation of a videoconferencing experiment in primary schools, teaching modern foreign languages. The Language Learning Journal 38(2), 209220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571731003790508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satar, H. M. (2013) Multimodal language learner interactions via desktop videoconferencing within a framework of social presence: Gaze. ReCALL 25(1), 122142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, H. (2010) Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis‘ placement’ of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 41(3), 502511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00974.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Hoonaard, W. C. (1997) Working with sensitizing concepts: Analytical field research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2004) Supporting synchronous distance language learning with desktop videoconferencing. Language Learning & Technology 8(3), 90121.Google Scholar
Whyte, S. (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms. ReCALL 23(3), 271293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344011000188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2010) Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Zbar, V. Jane, G. (2012) Innovative Language Provision in Clusters (ILPIC) initiative evaluation. Melbourne: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.Google Scholar
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Videoconferencing and the networked provision of language programs in regional and rural schools
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Videoconferencing and the networked provision of language programs in regional and rural schools
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Videoconferencing and the networked provision of language programs in regional and rural schools
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *