Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-h2mp8 Total loading time: 0.144 Render date: 2021-07-30T02:22:36.171Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

New model for agricultural countermeasures in RODOS and ARGOS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2010

F. Gering
Affiliation:
Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, München-Neuherberg, Germany
W. Raskob
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kern- und Energietechnik, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
T. Charnock
Affiliation:
Health Protection Agency, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, UK
Get access

Abstract

Predictions of the effects of agricultural countermeasures are an important part of the decision-making process following an accidental release of radioactive material into the environment. A new model has been developed for this purpose and integrated into the EU decision support systems RODOS and ARGOS. The model is based on the existing food chain model of RODOS and the previous model for simulating agricultural countermeasures in RODOS. The characteristics of the countermeasures and the supporting databases have been derived from the compendia and handbooks developed within the EURANOS project. A wide range of potentially practicable countermeasures is considered on timescales from a day to many years, and endpoints related to their imposition are calculated such that the economic and health impacts can be evaluated. This paper outlines the countermeasures methodology adopted and the databases used and discusses their applicability.

Type
Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, J., Smith, K.R., Mansfield, P., Smith, J. (1997) Models for Decontamination, Relocation and Agricultural Countermeasures in RODOS, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 73, 75-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council Regulation 87/3954/EURATOM (1987) laying down the maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and feeding stuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency. Off J Eur Commun L371/11.
Ehrhardt, J., Raskob, W. (2007) Status of the RODOS system for off-site emergency management after nuclear and radiological accidents and its enhancement under the EURANOS project, IJNGEE 1, 363-371.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt J., Weis A. (2000) RODOS: Decision Support System for Off-site Nuclear Emergency Management in Europe. European Commission, Brussels, Report EUR 19144.
Hoe S., Mc Ginnity P., Charnock T.W., Gering F., Andersson K.G., Astrup P. (2008) ARGOS CBRN Decision Support System for Nuclear and Radiological Emergency Management. In: Proceedings: IRPA 12. The 12th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association October 19–24, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Müller, H., Bleher, M. (1997) Exposure Pathways and Dose Calculations in RODOS: Improvement of Predictions by Measured Data, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 73, 75-79.Google Scholar
Müller, H., Pröhl, G. (1993) ECOSYS-87: A Dynamic Model for Assessing Radiological Consequences of Nuclear Accidents, Health Phys. 64, 232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbet A.F., Jones A., Turcanu C., Camps J., Andersson K.G., Hanninen R., Rantavaara A., Solatie D., Kostiainen E., Jullien T., Pupin V., Ollagnon H., Papachristodoulou C., Ioannides K., Oughton D. (2009) Generic handbook for assisting in the management of contaminated food production systems in Europe following a radiological emergency v2. EURANOS(CAT1)-TN(09)-01. Available at http://www.euranos.fzk.de.
Raskob, W., Gering, F., Lochard, J., Nisbet, A., Starostova, V., Tomic, B. (2010) Overview and main achievements of the EURANOS project: European Approach to Nuclear and Radiological Emergency Management and Rehabilitation Strategies, Radioprotection 45, S9-S22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

New model for agricultural countermeasures in RODOS and ARGOS
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

New model for agricultural countermeasures in RODOS and ARGOS
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

New model for agricultural countermeasures in RODOS and ARGOS
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *