Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:42:02.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Searching Solar Periodicities in the Late Glacial Record of Atmospheric Radiocarbon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Tomasz Goslar
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznan. Present address: Institute of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Pozań, Poland. Email: goslar@radiocarbon.pl.
Nadine Tisnérat-Laborde
Affiliation:
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CNRS-CEA, 91198 Gif sur Yvette, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon (AMS 14C) dating of the late glacial section of laminated sediments from Lake Gościąż and Lake Perespilno, Poland, performed with time resolution of 20–30 years suggests quasi-periodic oscillations of δ14C. The regularity of oscillations has been checked by the Maximum Entropy and Fast Fourier Transform methods (MEM and FFT), which revealed peaks at 200 and 230 yr. These periods are similar to those found in the high-precision Holocene δ14C record, and attributed to the changing sun. The analytical assessment of the significance of the FFT and MEM peaks is problematic because of non-uniform spacing and various uncertainties in the input data. The significance of the peaks has therefore been studied by the Monte-Carlo method. Because the original data were approximated with a spline function, the amplitude of the MEM and FFT peaks depends on the stiffness of the spline, which is strongly related to the “real” uncertainty of 14C ages. The Monte-Carlo experiments demonstrate that the significance levels of the MEM and FFT peaks also depend on the spline stiffness. Therefore, the existence of solar 14C variations in the Late Glacial remains an open question.

Type
II. Getting More from the Data
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bard, E. 1998. Geochemical and geophysical implications of the radiocarbon calibration. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 62:2025–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard, E, Hamelin, B, Arnold, M, Montaggioni, L, Cabioch, G, Faure, G, Rougiere, F. 1996. Deglacial sea-level record from Tahiti corals and the timing of global meltwater discharge. Nature 382:241–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard, E, Raisbeck, GM, Yiou, F, Jouzel, J. 1997. Solar modulation of cosmogenic nuclide production over the last millennium: comparison between 14C and 10Be records. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 150: 453–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, J, Siegenthaler, U, Bonani, G, Finkel, RC, Oeschger, H, Suter, M, Wölfli, W. 1988. Information on past solar activity and geomagnetism from 10Be in the Camp Century ice core. Nature 331:675–9.Google Scholar
Björck, S, Kromer, B, Johnsen, S, Bennike, O. 1996. Synchronized terrestrial-atmospheric deglacial records around the North Atlantic. Science 274:1155–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broecker, WS, Denton, GH. 1989. The role of ocean-atmosphere reorganizations in glacial cycles. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 53:2465–501.Google Scholar
Broecker, WS. 1994. Massive iceberg discharges as triggers for global climate change. Nature 372:421–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, RL, Warren Beck, J, Burr, GS, Donahue, DJ, Chappell, JMA, Bloom, AL, Druffel, ERM, Taylor, FW. 1993. A large drop in atmospheric 14C/12C and reduced melting in the Younger Dryas, documented with 230Th ages of corals. Science 260:962–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goslar, T, Arnold, M, Bard, E, Kuc, T, Pazdur, MF, Ralska-Jasiewiczowa, M, Tisnerat, N, Różański, K, Walanus, A, Wicik, B, Więckowski, K. 1995. High concentration of atmospheric 14C during the Younger Dryas cold episode. Nature 377:414–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goslar, T, Wohlfarth, B, Björck, S, Possnert, G, Björck, J. 1999. Variations of atmospheric 14C concentrations over the Alleröd-Younger Dryas transition. Climate Dynamics 15:2942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goslar, T, Arnold, M, Tisnerat-Laborde, N, Czernik, J, Więckowski, K. 2000a. Variations of Younger Dryas atmospheric radiocarbon explicable without ocean circulation changes. Nature 403:877–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goslar, T, Arnold, M, Tisnerat-Laborde, N, Hatté, Ch, Paterne, M, Ralska-Jasiewiczowa, M. 2000b. Radiocarbon calibration by means of varve versus 14C ages of terrestrial macrofossils from Lake Gościąż and Lake Perespilno, Poland. Radiocarbon 42(3):335–48.Google Scholar
Hughen, KA, Overpeck, JT, Lehman, SJ, Kashgarian, M, Southon, J, Peterson, LC, Alley, R, Sigman, D. 1998. Deglacial changes in ocean circulation from an extended radiocarbon calibration. Nature 391:65–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, H, van der Plicht, J. 1998. Atmospheric radiocarbon calibration to 45,000 yr B.P.: Late Glacial fluctuations and cosmogenic isotope production. Science 279:1187–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, WH, Flannery, BP, Teukolsky, WT, Vetterling, WT. 1989. Numerical recipes in Pascal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stocker, TF, Wright, DG. 1996. Rapid changes in ocean circulation and atmospheric radiocarbon. Paleoceanography 11:773–95.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Quay, PD. 1980. Changes in atmospheric carbon-14 attributed to a variable Sun. Science 207:11–9.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Braziunas, T, Becker, B, Kromer, B. 1991. Climatic, solar, oceanic, and geomagnetic influences on Late-Glacial and Holocene atmospheric 14C/12C change. Quaternary Research 35:124.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Braziunas, T. 1993a. Modeling atmospheric 14C influences and 14C ages of marine samples to 10,000 BC. Radiocarbon 35(1): 137–89.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Braziunas, T. 1993b. Sun, ocean, climate and atmospheric 14CO2: an evaluation of causal and spectral relationships. The Holocene 3:289305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar