Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T17:45:15.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Radiocarbon Dating Protocol for use with Packard Scintillation Counters Employing Burst-Counting Circuitry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

G. T. Cook  and
Robert Anderson
G. T. Cook
Affiliation:
SURRC Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, Scottish Universities Research and Reactor Centre East Kilbride G75 0QU Scotland
Robert Anderson
Affiliation:
SURRC Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, Scottish Universities Research and Reactor Centre East Kilbride G75 0QU Scotland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Considerable research has been carried out in this laboratory on the use of Packard scintillation counters employing burst-counting circuitry. The nature of the pulse-shape discrimination circuit has led to redefining our sample vialing philosophy and scintillation cocktail optimization. Results presented here demonstrate: 1) the enhancements in efficiency that are achievable using a two-component cocktail compared with the use of a primary fluor only; 2) the development of a cocktail in which efficiency and quenching are relatively unaffected by moderate variations in fluor concentrations and ratio; 3) the rationale behind the use of screw-cap vials rather than sealable ampules; 4) the advantage of nickel/chromium-plated brass caps over standard plastic caps.

Type
I. Sample Preparation and Measurement Techniques
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 34 , Issue 3: Proceedings of the 14th International Radiocarbon Conference , 1992 , pp. 381 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Noakes, J. E., de Filippis, S. J. and Valenta, R. J. 1988 Low background liquid scintillation counting using an active sample holder and pulse discrimination electronics. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar for Liquid Scintillation Analysis, Tokyo, Japan, Packard Japan K.K.: 5–43.Google Scholar
Polach, H., Gower, J., Kojola, H. and Heinonen, A. 1983 An ideal vial and cocktail for low level scintillation counting. In McQuarrie, S. A., Ediss, C. and Wiebe, L. I., eds., Advances in Scintillation Counting. University of Alberta Press: 508–525.Google Scholar
Polach, H., Calf, G., Harkness, D. D., Hogg, A., Kaihola, L. and Robertson, S. 1988 Performance of new technology liquid scintillation counters for 14C dating. Nuclear Geophysics 2(2): 75–79.Google Scholar
Valenta, R. J. 1986 Reduced background scintillation counting, U.S. Patent No. 4, 651, 006.Google Scholar
Van Cauter, S. 1986 Three dimension spectrum analysis: a new approach to reduce background of liquid scintillation counters. Packard Instrument Co., Packard Applications Bulletin 006.Google Scholar