Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T07:22:44.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pretreatment of Wood and Char Samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Hyman Schultz
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
L. A. Currie
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
F. R. Matson
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
W. W. Miller
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It has been shown that contamination from humic acids, chitin, fungal products, etc., contributing young carbon, and from bitumen and carbonate, contributing old carbon, may not be completely removed from wood and char samples by the usual hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide pretreatments of the samples. A procedure is offered for the isolation of a pure chemical substance from such samples, cellulose from wood and uncombined carbon from char, that must represent the original material. Cellulose is prepared by boiling the resin-free sample in 1.25% H2SO4 and 1.25% NaOH, adding Schweitzer's reagent, filtering, and precipitating from the filtrate by acidification. Uncombined carbon is separated from char samples as the flocculant precipitate remaining after boiling in 70% HNO3, followed by settling overnight from a large volume of 6M HNO3. A simple procedure for the chemical examination of char samples is also offered for the estimation of the amounts of bitumen, carbonate, combined, and uncombined carbon in char.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Bern II, Gfeller, Oeschger, and Schwarz, , 1961, Bern Radiocarbon Dates II: Radiocarbon, v. 3, p. 1525.Google Scholar