Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:31:44.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extension of the Southern Hemisphere Atmospheric Radiocarbon Curve, 2120–850 Years BP: Results from Tasmanian Huon Pine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Susan Zimmerman ,
Thomas Guilderson ,
Brendan Buckley  and
Edward Cook
Susan Zimmerman*
Affiliation:
Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
Thomas Guilderson
Affiliation:
Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA Dept. of Ocean Sciences and Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 94064, USA
Brendan Buckley
Affiliation:
Tree-Ring Laboratory of the Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York 10964, USA
Edward Cook
Affiliation:
Tree-Ring Laboratory of the Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York 10964, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: zimmerman17@llnl.gov.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Decadal samples of dendrochronologically dated pine (Lagorostrobos franklinii) from the Stanley River basin, Tasmania, have been radiocarbon dated between 2120–850 yr BP. This data set overlaps and extends the current Southern Hemisphere record, which covers the period 110–995 yr BP. There is good agreement between the 2 records between 995–850 yr BP, between sample replicates and with consensus values for standards. As in the younger data set, we find evidence for a distinct but variable offset between the Southern Hemisphere data and IntCal04; although this is likely due to real temporal variability in the interhemispheric offset, further work is planned to rule out possible laboratory or sample preparation differences.

Type
Calibration, Data Analysis, and Statistical Methods
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 3: 20th Int. Radiocarbon Conference Proceedings , 2010 , pp. 887 - 894
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Buckley, BM, Cook, ER, Peterson, MJ, Barbetti, M. 1997. A changing temperature response with elevation for Lagarostrobos franklinii in Tasmania, Australia. Climatic Change 36(3–4):477–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, AG, McCormac, FG, Higham, TFG, Reimer, PJ, Bailie, MGL, Palmer, JG. 2002. High-precision radiocarbon measurements of contemporaneous tree-ring dated wood from the British Isles and New Zealand: AD 1850–950. Radiocarbon 44(3):633–40.Google Scholar
McCormac, FG, Hogg, AG, Higham, TFG, Lynch-Stieglitz, J, Broecker, WS, Baillie, MGL, Palmer, J, Xiong, L, Pilcher, J, Brown, D, Hoper, ST. 1998. Temporal variation in the interhemispheric 14C offset. Geophysical Research Letters 25(9):1321–4.Google Scholar
McCormac, FG, Reimer, PJ, Hogg, AG, Higham, TFG, Bailie, MGL, Palmer, JG, Stuiver, M. 2002. Calibration of the radiocarbon time scale for the Southern Hemisphere: AD 1850–950. Radiocarbon 44(3):641–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, GW, Pilcher, JR, Bailie, MGL, Corbett, DM, Qua, F. 1986. High-precision 14C measurement of Irish oaks to show the natural 14C variations from AD 1840 to 5210 BC. Radiocarbon 28(2B):911–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Braziunas, TF 1998. Anthropogenic and solar components of hemispheric 14C. Geophysical Research Letters 25(3):329–32.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, JC, Fuls, A, Visser, E, Becker, B. 1993. Pretoria calibration curve for short-lived samples, 1930–3350 BC. Radiocarbon 35(1):73–85.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):289–93.Google Scholar