Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T17:27:57.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Concept of DC Gain in Modeling Secular Variations in Atmospheric 14C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Gregory Lazear ,
Paul E Damon  and
Robert Sternberg
Gregory Lazear
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85719
Paul E Damon
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85719
Robert Sternberg
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85719
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A constraint on radiocarbon reservoir models is that the DC gain of a system (system transfer function at zero frequency) should equal the equilibrium ratio of the atmospheric radiocarbon mass to the production rate. The simple one-box model is essentially a “black box” but the value of the single residence time is theoretically equal to the DC gain. Using a sunspot-production rate algorithm as the forcing function, predictions of the one-box model match the 14C data from ad 1700 to 1900 better than the 3-box, 5-box and box-diffusion models. The more complex models tend to pile up 14C in the atmosphere because their DC gains are too high, and they over-attenuate the de Vries “wiggles”. The DC gains can be reduced to more acceptable levels by adjusting model parameters, particularly the sizes of the ocean reservoirs. Better fits to the “wiggles” are also obtained by parameter adjustment. Water content of deep-sea sediments constitutes an extra reservoir for dead carbon, and should help reduce system DC gain.

Type
Natural 14C Variations
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , 1980 , pp. 318 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Bacastow, R and Keeling, C D, 1973, Atmospheric carbon dioxide and radiocarbon in the natural carbon cycle. II. Changes from ad 1700 to 2070 as deduced from a geochemical model, in Woodwell, G M, and Pecan, E V, eds, Carbon and the biosphere, Brookhaven symposium in biology, 24th, Proc: Upton, N Y 1972: USAEC Conf—720510, p 86–135.Google Scholar
Damon, P E, Lerman, J C, and Long, Austin, 1978, Temporal fluctuations of atmospheric 14C: causal factors and implications, in Annual review of earth and planetary sciences: Ann Rev Inc, Palo Alto, Calif, p 457–494.Google Scholar
Eddy, J A, 1976, The sun since the Bronze age, in Williams, P J, ed, Physics of solar planetary environments: Am Geophys Union, v 2, p 958–972.Google Scholar
Ekdahl, C A and Keeling, C D, 1973, Atmospheric carbon dioxide and radiocarbon in the natural carbon cycle: I. Quantitative deductions from records at Mauna Loa observatory and at the South Pole, in Woodwell, G M, and Pecan, E V, eds, Carbon and the biosphere, Brookhaven symposium in biology, 24th, Proc: Upton N Y 1972, USAEC Conf—720510, p 51–85. 5Google Scholar
Godwin, Harry, 1962, Half-life of radiocarbon: Nature, v 195, no. 4845, p 984.Google Scholar
Grey, D C and Damon, P E, 1970, Sunspots and radiocarbon dating in the Middle Ages, in Berger, Rainer, ed, Scientific studies in Medieval archaeology: Berkeley, Univ California Press, p 167–182.Google Scholar
Houtermans, J C, Suess, H E, and Oeschger, Hans, 1973, Reservoir models and production rate variations of natural radiocarbon: Jour Geophys Research v 78 no 12 p 1897–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Jeffrey, Lerman, J C, Damon, P E, and Linick, Timothy, 1980, Radiocarbon concentration in the atmosphere: 8000-year record of variations in tree-rings. First results of a USA workshop, in Stuiver, Minze and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no. 3, p 950–961.Google Scholar
Lingenfelter, R E, 1963, Production of carbon-14 by cosmic-ray neutrons: Rev Geophysics, v 1, no. 1, p 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lingenfelter, R E and Ramaty, R, 1970, Astrophysical and geophysical variations in C14 production, in Olsson, I U, ed, Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology, Nobel symposium, 12th, Proc: New York, John Wiley & Sons, p 513–537.Google Scholar
Oeschger, Hans, Siegenthaler, Ulrich, Schotterer, Ulrich, and Gugelmann, A, 1975, A box diffusion model to study the carbon dioxide exchange in nature: Tellus, v 27 no 2 p 168–192.Google Scholar
Poldervaart, A, 1955, Chemistry of the earth's crust, in Poldervaart, A, ed, Crust of the earth: Geol Soc America spec paper 62, p 119–144.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R S and Damon, P E, 1979, Sensitivity of radiocarbon fluctuations and inventory to geomagnetic and reservoir parameters, in Berger, Rainer and Suess, Hans, eds, Radiocarbon dating, Internatl conf on radiocarbon dating, 9th, Proc: Berkeley/Los Angeles, Univ California Press, p 691–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, Minze and Quay, P D, 1980, Changes in atmospheric 14C attributed to a variable sun: Science, v 207, p 11–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed