Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T16:31:45.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AMS Radiocarbon Dating from the Neolithic of Eastern Ukraine Casts Doubts on Existing Chronologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2016

Giedre Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute ,
Malcolm Lillie  and
Sergey Telizhenko
Giedre Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute*
Affiliation:
History Institute of Lithuania/Department of City Research, Kraziu g. 5, LT-01108, Vilnius, Lithuania
Malcolm Lillie
Affiliation:
Wetland Archaeology and Environments Research Centre, Department of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
Sergey Telizhenko
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, 12 Heroyiv Stalingradu Ave., 04210, Kiev, Ukraine
*
Corresponding author. Email: giedre.motuzaite@gmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Seversky Donets River (Northern Donets) basin in eastern Ukraine and the Lower Don River valley in Russia were inhabited by populations that have been considered to be one of the earliest pottery-using cultures in Europe. The early pottery sites are all located on riverbanks and contain middens with many mollusk shells and fish bones. This suggests the intense exploitation of freshwater resources. The accuracy of radiocarbon dates obtained from these locations is of crucial importance for understanding the development of new technologies, diversification of the food consumed and its preparation strategies, as well as the degree of sedentism in this region, associated with the beginnings of pottery-making technology. The chronology of Neolithic sites in this region, however, was developed on the basis of 14C dates commonly obtained through the dating of freshwater mollusk shells, pottery with mollusk shell temper, or organic residue on pottery shards. Such samples are potentially affected by the freshwater reservoir effect, raising concerns about the accuracy of those dates. This paper presents accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) 14C dates from a small pilot study from sites in eastern Ukraine in order to test for the presence of the reservoir effect in this region. The AMS 14C dates presented in this paper challenge the 14C chronology based on mollusk shell or organic residue, which appears to generate much older dates than those on wood charcoal or terrestrial animal bone.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , 2015 , pp. 657 - 664
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, MJ. 2001. Science-Based Dating in Archaeology. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Aleksandrovsky, AL, Belanovskaya, TD, Dolukhanov, PM, Kiyashko, VY, Kremenetsky, KV, Lavrentiev, NV, Shukurov, AM, Tsybriy, AV, Tsybriy, VV, Kovalyukh, NN, Skripkin, VV, Zaitseva, GI. 2009. The Lower Don Neolithic. In: Dolukhanov, P, Sarson, GR, Shukurov, AM, editors. The East European Plain on the Eve of Agriculture. BAR International Series 1964. Oxford: Archaeopress. p 89–121.Google Scholar
Anthony, DW. 1995. Is there a future for the past? An overview of archaeology in western Russia and Ukraine. Journal of Archaeological Research 3(3):177–204.Google Scholar
Bonsall, C, Cook, G, Manson, JL, Sanderson, D. 2002. Direct dating of Neolithic pottery: progress and prospects. Documenta Praehistorica 29:47–58.Google Scholar
Boudin, M, Van Strydonck, M, Crombé, P. 2010. Fish reservoir effect on charred food residue 14C dates: Are stable isotope analyses the solution? Radiocarbon 52(2):697–705.Google Scholar
Brock, F, Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, TFG. 2007. Quality assurance of ultrafiltered bone dating. Radiocarbon 49(2):187–92.Google Scholar
Brock, F, Higham, T, Ditchfield, P, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2010. Current pretreatment methods for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon 52(1):103–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Lee, S. 2013. Recent and planned developments of the program OxCal. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):720–30.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, T, Leach, P. 2004a. Towards high-precision AMS: progress and limitations. Radiocarbon 46(1):17–24.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, T, Bowles, A, Hedges, REM. 2004b. Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon 46(1):155–63.Google Scholar
Clark, ID, Fritz, P. 1997. Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology. New York: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Davison, K, Dolukhanov, P, Sarson, G, Shukurov, A, Zaitseva, G. 2009. Multiple sources of the European Neolithic: mathematical modelling constrained by radiocarbon dates. Quaternary International 103(1–2):10–8.Google Scholar
Dolukhanov, P, Shukurov, A, Gronenborn, D, Sokoloff, D, Timofeev, V, Zaitseva, G. 2005. The chronology of Neolithic dispersal in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 32(10):1441–58.Google Scholar
Fernandes, R, Bergemann, S, Hartz, S, Grootes, PM, Nadeau, M-J, Melzner, F, Rakowski, A, Hüls, M. 2012. Mussels with meat: bivalve tissue-shell radiocarbon age differences and archaeological implications. Radiocarbon 54(3–4):953–65.Google Scholar
Fischer, A, Heinemeier, J. 2003. Freshwater reservoir effect in 14C dates of food residue on pottery. Radiocarbon 45(3):449–66.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, GA. 1987. Radiocarbon age anomalies in shell carbonate of land snails from semi-arid areas. Radiocarbon 29(2):159–67.Google Scholar
Gronenborn, D. 2003. Migration, acculturation, and culture change in western temperate Eurasia, 6500–5000 cal BC. Documenta Praehistorica 30:79–91.Google Scholar
Gronenborn, D. 2008. The early Neolithic on the Great Hungarian Plain: investigations of the Koros culture site of Ecsegfalva 23, County Bekes. Antiquity 82(317):798–800.Google Scholar
Keaveney, EM, Reimer, PJ. 2012. Understanding the variability in freshwater radiocarbon reservoir offsets: a cautionary tale. Journal of Archaeological Science 39(5):1306–16.Google Scholar
Kotova, NS. 2003. Neolithization in Ukraine. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Lillie, MC. 1996. Mesolithic and Neolithic populations of Ukraine: indications of diet from dental pathology. Current Anthropology 37(1):135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillie, MC. 1998. The Dnieper Rapid region of Ukraine: a consideration of chronology, dental pathology, and diet at the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition . Sheffield: University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Lillie, MC. 2001. Mesolithic cultures of Ukraine: observations on cultural development in the light of new radiocarbon determinations from the Dnieper Rapids cemeteries. In: Zvelebil, M, Fewster, K, editors. Ethnoarchaeology and Hunter-Gatherers: Pictures at an Exhibition. BAR International Series 955. Oxford: Archaeopress. p 53–63.Google Scholar
Lillie, MC, Jacobs, K. 2006. Stable isotope analysis of 14 individuals from the Mesolithic cemetery of Vasilyevka II, Dnieper Rapids region, Ukraine. Journal of Archaeological Science 33(6):880–6.Google Scholar
Lillie, MC, Richards, M. 2000. Stable isotope analysis and dental evidence of diet at the Mesolithic–Neolithic transition in Ukraine. Journal of Archaeological Science 27(10):965–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillie, MC, Richards, MP, Jacobs, K. 2003. Stable isotope analysis of 21 individuals from the Epipalaeolithic cemetery of Vasilyevka III, Dnieper Rapids region, Ukraine. Journal of Archaeological Science 30(6):743–52.Google Scholar
Lillie, MC, Budd, C, Potekhina, I, Hedges, R. 2009. The radiocarbon reservoir effect: new evidence from the cemeteries of the middle and lower Dnieper basin, Ukraine. Journal of Archaeological Science 36(2):256–64.Google Scholar
Manko, VA. 2006. Neolit pivdenno-skhidnoi Ukraini. Kiev: Shlyakh.Google Scholar
Manko, VA, Telizhenko, SA. 2002. Mezolit, neolit i eneolit Podonechya. Katalog padiokarbonnykh dat. Lugansk: Shlyakh.Google Scholar
Mazurkevich, A, Dolbunova, E. 2012. The most ancient pottery and Neolithisation of Eastern Europe. Fontes Archaeologici Posnanienses 48:143–59.Google Scholar
Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute, G. 2012. The earliest appearance of domesticated plant species and their origins on the western fringes of the Eurasian Steppe. Documenta Praehistorica 39:1–21.Google Scholar
Philippsen, B. 2013. The freshwater reservoir effect in radiocarbon dating. Heritage Science 1(1):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–87.Google Scholar
Telegin, DY, Titova, EN. 1998. Poseleniya dnepro-donetskoi etnokulturnoi obschnosti epokhi neolita. Kiev: Naukova duma.Google Scholar
Timofeev, VI, Zaitseva, G, Dolukhanov, PM, Shukurov, AM. 2004. Radiouglerodnaya khronologiya Neolita severnoi Evrazii. Saint Petersburg: Teza.Google Scholar
Tsybrii, VV. 2008. Neolit nizhnego Dona i Severo-Vostochnogo Priazovya. Rostov-na-Donu: APSN SKNTS VSH YUFU.Google Scholar
Zaitseva, G, Skripkin, VV, Kovalyukh, NN, Possnert, G, Dolukhanov, PM, Vybornov, AA. 2009. Radiocarbon dating of Neolithic pottery. Radiocarbon 51(2):795–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar