Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:19:50.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relative utility of foraminifera and diatoms for reconstructing late Holocene sea-level change in North Carolina, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew C. Kemp ,
Benjamin P. Horton ,
D. Reide Corbett ,
Stephen J. Culver ,
Robin J. Edwards  and
Orson van de Plassche
Andrew C. Kemp*
Affiliation:
Sea-Level Research Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Benjamin P. Horton
Affiliation:
Sea-Level Research Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
D. Reide Corbett
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA Institute of Interdisciplinary Coastal Science and Policy, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
Stephen J. Culver
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
Robin J. Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
Orson van de Plassche
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. Email Address:kempac@sas.upenn.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Foraminifera and diatoms preserved in salt-marsh sediments have been used to produce high-resolution records of Holocene relative sea-level (RSL) change. To determine which of these microfossil groups is most appropriate for this purpose we investigated their relative utility from salt marshes in North Carolina, USA. Regional-scale transfer functions were developed using foraminifera, diatoms and a combination of both (multi-proxy) from three salt marshes (Oregon Inlet, Currituck Barrier Island and Pea Island). We evaluated each approach on the basis of transfer-function performance. Foraminifera, diatoms and multi-proxy-based transfer functions all demonstrated a strong relationship between observed and predicted elevations (r2jack > 0.74 and RMSEP < 0.05 m), suggesting that they have equal utility. Application of the transfer functions to a fossil core from Salvo to reconstruct former sea levels enabled us to consider relative utility in light of ‘paleo-performance’. Fossil foraminifera had strong modern analogues, whilst diatoms had poor modern analogues making them unreliable. This result reflects the high diversity and site-specific distribution of modern diatoms. Consequently, we used foraminifera to reconstruct RSL change for the period since ∼ AD 1800 using a 210Pb- and 14C-based chronology, and we were able to reconcile this with tide-gauge records.

Keywords

ForaminiferaDiatomsTransfer functionSea levelNorth Carolina
Type
Articles
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 9 - 21
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, P.M., Bartlein, P.J., Brubaker, L.B., Gajewski, K., and Ritchie, J.C. Modern analogues of late Quaternary pollen spectra from the western interior of North America. Journal of Biogeography 161, (1989). 573–596.Google Scholar
Appleby, P.G., and Oldfield, F. Application of Pb-210 to sedimentation studies. Ivanovich, M., and Harmon, R.S. Uranium-series Disequilibrium: Applications to Earth, Marine, and Environmental Problems. (1992). Clarendon Press, Oxford. 731–778.Google Scholar
Birks, H.J.B. Quantitative palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. Maddy, D., and Brew, J.S. Statistical modeling of Quaternary science data. Technical Guide 5. (1995). Quaternary Research Association, Cambridge. 161–254.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C., (2005). OxCal version 3.10. http://www.rlaha.ox.ac.uk/orau//oxcal.html.Google Scholar
Cable, J., Burnett, W., Moreland, S., and Westmoreland, J. Empirical assessment of gamma ray self-absorption in environmental analyses. Radioactivity and Radiochemistry 12, (2001). 30–39.Google Scholar
Culver, S.J., and Horton, B.P. Infaunal marsh foraminifera from the Outer Banks, North Carolina, USA. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 35, (2005). 148–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutshall, N.H., Larsen, I.L., and Olsen, C.R. Direct analysis of 210Pb in sediment samples: self-adsorption corrections. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research 206, (1983). 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, J.P., Cleary, P., Newby, P., and Ettinger, R. Coupling instrumental and geological records of sea-level change: Evidence from southern New England of an increase in the rate of sea-level rise in the late 19th century. Geophysical Research Letters 31, (2004). L05203 Google Scholar
Edwards, R.J. Constructing chronologies of sea level change from salt-marsh sediments. Buck, C.E., and Millard, A.R. Tools for constructing Chronologies: Crossing Discipline Boundaries. (2004). Springer Verlag, London. 189–211.Google Scholar
Edwards, R.J. Sea level studies: low energy coasts sedimentary indicators. Elias, S.A. Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science. (2006). Elsevier, 2094–3006.Google Scholar
Edwards, R.J., Wright, A.J., and van de Plassche, O. Surface distributions of salt-marsh foraminifera from Connecticut, USA: modern analogues for high resolution sea level studies. Marine Micropaleontology 51, (2004). 1–21.Google Scholar
Edwards, R.J., van de Plassche, O., Gehrels, W.R., and Wright, A.J. Assesing sea level data from Connecticut, USA using a foraminiferal transfer function for tide level. Marine Micropaleontology 51, (2004). 239–255.Google Scholar
Fatela, F., and Taborda, R. Confidence limits of species proportions in microfossil assemblages. Marine Micropaleontology 45, (2002). 169–174.Google Scholar
Gehrels, W.R. Using foraminiferal transfer functions to produce high resolution sea-level records from salt-marsh deposits, Maine, USA. The Holocene 10, (2000). 367–376.Google Scholar
Gehrels, W.R., Roe, H.M., and Charman, D.J. Foraminifera, testate amoebae and diatoms as sea level indicators in UK salt marshes: a quantitative multi-proxy approach. Journal of Quaternary Science 16, (2001). 201–220.Google Scholar
Gehrels, W.R., Belknap, D.F., Black, S., and Newnham, R.M. Rapid sea-level rise in the Gulf of Maine, USA, since AD 1800. The Holocene 12, (2002). 383–389.Google Scholar
Gehrels, W.R., Kirby, J.R., Prokoph, A., Newnham, R.M., Achterberg, E.P., Evans, E.H., Black, S., and Scott, D.B. Onset of recent rapid sea-level rise in the western Atlantic Ocean. Quaternary Science Reviews 24, (2005). 2083–2100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrels, W.R., Marshall, W.A., Gehrels, M.J., Larsen, G., Kirby, J.R., Eiriksson, J., Heinemeier, J., and Shimmield, T. Rapid sea-level rise in the North Atlantic Ocean since the first half of the 19th century. The Holocene 16, (2006). 948–964.Google Scholar
Gehrels, W.R., Hayward, B.W., Newnham, R.M., and Southall, K.E. A 20th century sea-level acceleration in New Zealand. Geophysical Research Letters 35, (2008). L02717 Google Scholar
Goldstein, S.T., and Watkins, G.T. Elevation and the distribution of salt-marsh foraminifera, St. Catherine's Island, Georgia: a taphonomic approach. Palaios, 13, (1998). 570–580.Google Scholar
Grigg, L.D., and Whitlock, C. Evidence for millennial scale climate change during marine isotope stages 2 and 3 at Little Lake, Western Oregon, USA. Quaternary Research 56, (2001). 10–22.Google Scholar
Heegaard, E., Birks, H.J.B., and Telford, R.J. Relationships between calibrated ages and depth in stratigraphical sequences: an estimation procedure by mixed effect regression. The Holocene 15, (2005). 612–618.Google Scholar
Hess, K.W., Spargo, E., Wong, A., White, S.A., and Gill, S.K. VDatum for Coastal North Carolina: Tidal Datums, Marine Grids, and Sea Surface Topography. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2005). NOAA Technical Report NOS CS 21, Silver Spring, Maryland.Google Scholar
Hill, M.O. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54, (1973). 427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hippensteel, S.P., Martin, R.E., Nikitina, D., and Pizzuto, J.E. The formation of Holocene marsh foraminiferal assemblages, middle Atlantic coast, USA: implications for the Holocene sea-level change. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 30, (2000). 272–293.Google Scholar
Horton, B.P., and Edwards, R.J. Seasonal distributions of foraminifera and their implications for sea-level studies. Uranium-series Disequilibrium: Applications to Earth, Marine, and Environmental Problems 75, (2003). SEPM Special Publication, 21–30.Google Scholar
Horton, B.P., and Edwards, R.J. The application of local and regional transfer functions to the reconstruction of Holocene sea levels, north Norfolk, England. The Holocene 15, (2005). 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, B.P., and Edwards, R.J. Quantifying Holocene sea level change using intertidal foraminifera: lessons from the British Isles. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research Special Publication 40, (2006). Google Scholar
Horton, B.P., and Murray, J.W. Patterns in cumulative increase in live and dead species from foraminiferal time-series of Cowpen Marsh, Tees Estuary, UK: implications for sea-level studies. Marine Micropaleontology 58, (2006). 287–315.Google Scholar
Horton, B.P., Culver, S.J., in press. Modern intertidal foraminifera of the Outer Banks, North Carolina, USA and their applicability for sea level studies. Journal of Coastal Research.Google Scholar
Horton, B.P., Whittaker, J.E., Thomson, K.H., Hardbattle, M.I.J., Kemp, A., Woodroffe, S.A., and Wright, M.R. The development of a modern foraminiferal data set for sea-level reconstructions, Wakatobi Marine National Park, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 35, (2005). 1–14.Google Scholar
Horton, B.P., Corbett, R., Culver, S.J., Edwards, R.J., and Hillier, C. Modern salt marsh diatom distributions of the Outer Banks, North Carolina, and the development of a transfer function for high resolution reconstructions of sea level. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 69, (2006). 381–394.Google Scholar
Horton, B.P., Zong, Y., Hillier, C., and Engelhart, S. Diatoms from Indonesian mangroves and their suitability as sea-level indicators for tropical environments. Marine Micropaleontology 63, (2007). 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbrie, J., and Kipp, N. A new micropaleontological method for quantitative paleoclimatology: application to a late pleistocene Caribbean core. Turekian, K.K. The Late Cenozoic Glacial Ages. (1971). Yale University Press, New Haven. 71–181.Google Scholar
IPCC Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H.L. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Jackson, S.T., and Williams, J.W. Modern analogs in Quaternary paleoecology: here today, gone yesterday, gone tomorrow. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 32, (2004). 495–537.Google Scholar
Jennings, A.E., and Nelson, A.R. Foraminiferal assemblage zones in Oregon tidal marshes; relation to marsh floral zones and sea level. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 22, (1992). 13–29.Google Scholar
Juggins, S. C2 User guide. Software for Ecological and Palaeoecological Data Analysis and Visualization. (2003). University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Kerr, R.A. A worrying trend of less ice, higher seas. Science 311, (2006). 1698–1701.Google Scholar
Marshall, W.A., Gehrels, W.R., Garnett, M.H., Freeman, S.P.H.T., Maden, C., and Xu, S. The use of ‘bomb-spike’ calibration and high precision AMS 14C analyses to date salt-marsh sediments deposited during the past three centuries. Quaternary Research 68, (2007). 325–337.Google Scholar
Massey, A.C., Gehrels, W.R., Charman, D.J., and White, S.V. An intertidal foraminifera-based transfer function for reconstructing Holocene sea-level change in southwest England. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 36, (2006). 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L., and Douglas, B.C. On the rate and causes of twentieth century sea-level rise. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 364, (2006). 805–820.Google Scholar
Myers, E.P., Wong, A., Hess, K., White, S., Spargo, E., Feyen, J., Yang, Z., Richardson, P., Auer, C., Sellars, J., Woolard, J., Roman, D., Gill, S., Zervas, C., and Tronvig, K. Development of a National VDatum, and its application to sea level rise in North Carolina. U.S. Hydrographic Conference, San Diego, California, March 28–31, 2005 (2005). Google Scholar
Nelson, A.R., and Kashima, K. Diatom zonation in southern Oregon tidal marshes relative to vascular plants, foraminifera and sea level. Journal of Coastal Research 9, (1993). 673–697.Google Scholar
Nelson, A.R., Sawai, Y., Jennings, J.E., Bradley, L., Gerson, L., Sherrod, B.L., Sabean, J., and Horton, B.P. Great earthquake paleogeodesy and tsunamis of the past 2000 years at Alsea Bay, central Oregon coast, USA. Quaternary Science Reviews 27, (2008). 747–768.Google Scholar
Ng, S.L., and Sin, F.S. A diatom model for inferring sea level change in coastal waters of Hong Kong. Journal of Paleolimnology 30, (2003). 427–440.Google Scholar
Nydick, K.R., Bidwell, A.B., Thomas, A., and Varekamp, J.C. A sea level rise curve from Guildford, Connecticut, USA. Marine Geology 124, (1995). 137–159.Google Scholar
Ozarko, D.L., Patterson, R.T., and Williams, H.F.L. Marsh foraminifera from Nanaimo, British Columbia: infaunal habitat and taphonomic implications. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 27, (1997). 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overpeck, J.T., Webb, T. III, and Prentice, I.C. Quantitative interpretation of fossil pollen spectra: Dissimilarity coefficients and the method of modern analogs. Quaternary Research 23, (1985). 87–108.Google Scholar
Patterson, R.T., and Fishbein, E. Re-examination of the statistical methods used to determine the number of point counts needed for micropaleontological quantitative research. Journal of Paleontology 63, (1989). 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, R.T., Guilbault, J.P., and Clague, J.J. Taphonomy of tidal marsh foraminifera: implications of surface sample thickness for high-resolution sea-level studies. Palaeogeography, Paleoclimatology, Palaeoecology 149, (1999). 199–211.Google Scholar
Patterson, R.T., Hutchinson, I., Guilbault, J.P., and Clague, J.J. A comparison of the vertical zonation of diatom, foraminifera and macrophyte assemblages in a coastal marsh: implications for greater paleo-sea level resolution. Micropaleontology 46, (2000). 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, R.T., Gehrels, W.R., Belknap, D.F., and Dalby, A.P. The distribution of salt marsh foraminifera at Little Dipper Harbour New Brunswick, Canada: implications for development of widely applicable transfer functions in sea-level research. Quaternary International, 120, (2004). 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, R.T., Dalby, A.P., Roe, H.M., Guilbault, J.P., Hutchinson, I., and Clague, J.J. Relative utility of foraminifera, diatoms and macrophytes as high resolution indicators of paleo-sea level in coastal British Columbia, Canada. Quaternary Science Reviews 24, (2005). 2002–2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilkey, O.H., and Fraser, M.E. A Celebration of the World's barrier Islands. (2003). Columbia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, H.M., Webb, T. III, and Clark, D.R. Paleoecological transfer functions. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 5, (1977). 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawai, Y., Nagumo, T., and Horton, B.P. Diatom-based elevation transfer function along the Pacific coast of eastern Hokkaido, northern Japan — an aid in paleo-seismic study along the coasts near Kurile subduction zone. Journal of Quaternary Science 23, (2004). 2467–2484.Google Scholar
Scott, D.B., and Hermelin, J.O.R. A device for precision splitting of micropaleontological samples in liquid suspension. Journal of Paleontology 67, (1993). 151–154.Google Scholar
Sen Gupta, B. Modern Foraminifera. (1999). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Szkornik, K., Gehrels, W.R., and Kirby, J.R. Salt-marsh diatom distributions in Ho Bugt (western Denmark) and the development of a transfer function for reconstructing Holocene sea-level changes. Marine Geology 235, (2006). 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Plassche, O., van de van der Borg, K., and de Jong, A.F.M. Sea level-climate correlation during the past 1400 yr. Geology 26, (1998). 319–322.Google Scholar
Varekamp, J.C., Thomas, E., and van de Plassche, O. Relative sea-level rise and climate change over the last 1500 years. Terra Nova 4, (1992). 293–304.Google Scholar
Yang, H., Rose, N.L., and Battarbee, R.W. Dating of recent catchment peats using spheroid carbonaceous particle (SCP) concentration profiles with particular reference to Lochnagar, Scotland. The Holocene 11, (2001). 593–597.Google Scholar
Zervas, C. North Carolina Bathymetry/Topography Sea Level Rise Project: Determination of Sea Level Trends. (2004). NOAA Technical Report NOS CO-OPS 041, Google Scholar
Zong, Y. Mid and late Holocene sea level changes in Roudsea marsh, northwest England: a diatom biostratigraphical investigation. The Holocene 7, (1997). 311–323.Google Scholar
Zong, Y., and Horton, B.P. Diatom based tidal level transfer functions as an aid in reconstructing Quaternary history of sea level history in the UK. Journal of Quaternary Science 14, (1999). 153–167.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar