Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-nww4m Total loading time: 0.444 Render date: 2022-06-26T03:10:37.610Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Comparison of Foraminiferal, Coccolithophorid, and Radiolarian Paleotemperature Equations: Assemblage Coherency and Estimate Concordancy1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Barbara Molfino
Affiliation:
Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964
Nilva G. Kipp
Affiliation:
Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
Joseph J. Morley
Affiliation:
Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964

Abstract

The Imbrie-Kipp method of paleotemperature estimation is rigorously tested by comparing Atlantic temperature equations independently derived from the microfossils of three biotic groups: the Foraminifera, Coccolithophorida, and Radiolaria. This method consists of two steps: factor analysis of the modern sea-bed data of the individual groups which resolves discrete biogeographic assemblages and regression analysis of the modern assemblage data with observed sea-surface temperature data to obtain paleotemperature equations. Assemblage biogeography shows a simple subdivision into warm (low latitude) and cold (high latitude) for all biotic groups. Between biotic groups there is greater similarity among high-latitude assemblages than low-latitude ones. Correlating the assemblage data with observed sea-surface temperatures to produce temperature distribution patterns shows differences of less than 2°C in their optimum and critical temperatures. Regression analysis produced accurate temperature equations for each biotic group, all with standard errors of estimate of less than or equal to 2°C. Multiple correlation coefficients were all greater than 0.970. Applying these equations to two multiple biotic data sets (the modern and ice-age sea-bed data) and comparing their temperature estimates using the standard error pooled, shows over 87% concordancy for both data sets. Unlike the modern data, the discordancy among temperature estimates of the ice-age data shows a distinct geographic distribution; its cause is believed to be oceanographic, a difference in the water-mass structure between the modern and ice-age ocean.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory Contribution No. 3300.

References

, A.W.H. (1977). An ecological, zoogeographic and taxonomic review of recent planktonic foraminifera. Oceanic Micropaleontology Ramsey, A.T.S. Vol. 1, 1100.Google Scholar
Biscaye, P.E. Kolla, V. Turekian, K.K. (1976). Distribution of calcium carbonate in surface sediments of the Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research 81, 25952603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, L.E. Guillard, R.R.L. (1981). The effects of continuous light and light intensity on the reproduction rates of twenty-two species of marine phytoplankton. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 50, 119132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, C.A. Cooley, J.F. (1976). Circulation in the Gulf of Mexico during the last glacial maximum 18,000 yrs ago. Geological Society of America Bulletin 87, 681686.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, R.E. (1971). Distribution of polycystine Radiolaria in the oceans in relation to physical and chemical conditions. The Micropalaeontology of Oceans Funnell, B.M. Riede, W.R. 151159.Google Scholar
Chisholm, S.W. Brand, L.E. (1981). Persistence of cell division phasing in marine phytoplankton in continuous light after entrainment to light: dark cycles. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 51, 107118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLIMAP, . 1976. The surface of the ice-age earth. Science 191, 11311137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLIMAP Project Members, McIntyre, A. Leader LGM Project, . 1981. Seasonal reconstructions of the earth's surface at the last glacial maximum. Geological Society of America Map Series.Google Scholar
Crow, E.L. Davis, F.A. Maxfield, M.W. (1960). Statistics Manual. Dover. New York.Google Scholar
Darbyshire, J. (1964). A hydrological investigation of the Agulhas Current area. Deep-Sea Research 11, 781815.Google Scholar
Eppley, R.W. Rogers, J.N. McCarthy, J.J. Sournia, A. (1971). Light/dark periodicity in nitrogen assimilation of the marine phytoplankters Skeletonema costatum and Coccolithus huxleyi in N-limited chemostat culture. Journal of Phycology 7, 150154.Google Scholar
Feller, W. (1950). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications Vol. 1New York.Google Scholar
Gardner, J.V. Hays, J.D. (1976). Responses of sea-surface temperature and circulation to global climatic change during the past 200,000 years in the eastern equatorial Atlantic Ocean. Investigation of Late Quaternary Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology Cline, R.M. Hays, J.D. Geological Society of America Memoir 145, 221246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geitzenauer, K.R. Roche, M.B. McIntyre, A. (1976). Modern Pacific coccolith assemblages: Derivation and application to late Pleistocene paleotemperature analysis. Investigation of Late Quaternary Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology Cline, R.M. Hays, J.D. Geological Society of America Memoir 145, 423449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gründlingh, M.L. (1978). Drift of a satellite-tracked buoy in the southern Agulhas Current and Agulhas Return Current. Deep-Sea Research 25, 12091224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, T.F.W. Legickis, R. Van Forest, D. (1978). Satellite infra-red images in the Agulhas Current System. Deep-Sea Research 25, 543548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, T.F.W. Van Forest, D. (1978). The Agulhas Current in March 1969. Deep-Sea Research 25, 549561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, J.D. Lozano, J.A. Shackleton, N.J. Irving, G. (1976). Reconstruction of the Atlantic and western Indian Ocean sectors of the 18,000 B.P. Antarctic Ocean. Investigation of Late Quaternary Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology Cline, R.M. Hays, J.D. Geological Society of America Memoir 145, 337372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, L.A. Lorenzen, C.J. (1972). Relationships of chlorophyll maxima to density structure in the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico. Deep-Sea Research 19, 297306.Google Scholar
Hutson, W.H. Prell, W.L. (1980). A paleoecological transfer function, FI-2, for Indian Ocean planktonic foraminifera. Journal of Paleontology 54, 381399.Google Scholar
Imbrie, J. Kipp, N.G. (1971). A new micropaleontological method for quantitative paleoclimatology: Application to a late Pleistocene Caribbean core. The Late Cenozoic Glacial Ages Turekian, K. Yale Univ. Press. New Haven 71181.Google Scholar
Imbrie, J. van Donk, J. Kipp, N.G. (1973). Paleoclimatic investigation of a late Pleistocene Caribbean deep-sea core: Comparison of isotopic and faunal methods. Quaternary Research 3, 1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipp, N.G. (1976). New transfer function for estimating past sea-surface conditions from sea-bed distribution of planktonic foraminiferal assemblages in the North Atlantic. Investigation of Late Quaternary Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology Cline, R.M. Hays, J.D. Geological Society of America Memoir 145, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kling, S.A. (1979). Vertical distribution of polycystine Radiolarians in the Central North Pacific. Marine Micropaleontology 4, 295318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisitzin, A.P. (1972). Sedimentation in the World Ocean. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 17, 1218.Google Scholar
Lozano, J.A. Hays, J.D. (1976). Relationship of radiolarian assemblages to sediment types and physical oceanography in the Atlantic and western Indian Ocean sectors of the Antarctic Ocean. Investigation of Late Quaternary Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology Cline, R.M. Hays, J.D. Geological Society of America Memoir 145, 303336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luz, B. (1977). Late Pleistocene paleoclimates of the South Pacific based on statistical analysis of planktonic foraminifers. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 22, 6178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, A. , A.W.H. (1967). Modern Coccolithophoridae of the Atlantic Ocean. I. Placoliths and Cyrtoliths. Deep-Sea Research 14, 561597.Google Scholar
McIntyre, A. Ruddiman, W.F. Jantzen, R. (1972). Southward penetrations of the North Atlantic Polar Front: Faunal and floral evidence of largescale surface water mass movements over the last 225,000 years. Deep-Sea Research 19, 6177.Google Scholar
Molina-Cruz, A. (1977). The relationship of the southern trade winds to upwelling processes during the last 75,000 years. Quaternary Research 8, 324338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T.C. Jr.. 1973. Late Pleistocene-Holocene oceanographic changes in the northeastern Pacific. Quaternary Research 3, 99109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T.C. Jr.. 1978. The distribution of radiolarian assemblages in the modern and ice-age Pacific. Marine Micropaleontology 3, 229266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, J.J. (1979). A transfer function for estimating paleoceanographic conditions based on deep-sea surface sediment distribution of radiolarian assemblages in the South Atlantic. Quaternary Research 12, 381395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, J.J. Hays, J.D. (1979). Comparison of glacial and interglacial oceanographic conditions in the South Atlantic from variations in calcium carbonate and radiolarian distribution. Quaternary Research 12, 396408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D.M. Brand, L.E. (1979). Cell division periodicity in 13 species of marine phytoplankton on a light: dark cycle. Journal of Phycology 15, 6775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, H. Honjo, S. (1973). The distribution of oceanic coccolithophorids in the Pacific. Deep-Sea Research 20, 355374.Google Scholar
Okada, H. McIntyre, A. (1979). Seasonal distribution of modern coccolithophores in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Marine Biology 54, 319328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortner, P. (1978). Investigations into the Seasonal Deep Chlorophyll Maximum in the Western North Atlantic, and Its Possible Significance to Regional Food Chain Relationships. Ph.D. dissertation. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institutionunpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Pisias, N.G. (1979). Model for paleoceanographic reconstructions of the California Current during the last 8,000 years. Quaternary Research 11, 373386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prell, W.L. Hays, J.D. (1976). Late Pleistocene faunal and temperature patterns of the Colombia Basin, Caribbean Sea. Investigation of Late Quaternary Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology Cline, R.M. Hays, J.D. Geological Society of America Memoir 145, 201220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prell, W.L. Hutson, W.H. Williams, D.F. , A.W.H. Geizenauer, K. Molfino, B. (1980). Surface circulation of the Indian Ocean during the last glacial maximum, approximately 18,000 YBP. Quaternary Research 14, 309336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, M.B. McIntyre, A. Imbrie, J. (1975). Quantitative paleoceanography of the late Pleistocene-Holocene North Atlantic: Coccolith evidence. Late Neogene Epoch Boundaries Saito, T. Burckle, L.H. Micropaleontology Press. New York 195225.Google Scholar
Ryther, J.H. (1963). Geographic variations in productivity. The Sea Hill, M.N. Vol. 2 Interscience. New York 347380.Google Scholar
Sachs, H.M. (1975). Radiolarian-based estimate of North Pacific summer sea-surface temperature regime during the latest glacial maximum. Climate of the Arctic Weller, G. Bowling, S.A. 3742.Google Scholar
Sancetta, C. (1979). Oceanography of the North Pacific during the last 18,000 years: Evidence from fossil diatoms. Marine Micropaleontology 4, 103123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R.R. Rohlf, J.F. (1969). Biometry. Freeman. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Weibe, P.H. Hulburt, E.M. Carpenter, E.J. Jahn, A.E. Knapp, G.P. III Boyd, S.H. Ortner, P.B. Cox, J.L. (1976). Gulf Stream cold core rings: Large-scale interaction sites for open ocean plankton communities. Deep-Sea Research 23, 695710.Google Scholar
88
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Comparison of Foraminiferal, Coccolithophorid, and Radiolarian Paleotemperature Equations: Assemblage Coherency and Estimate Concordancy1
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Comparison of Foraminiferal, Coccolithophorid, and Radiolarian Paleotemperature Equations: Assemblage Coherency and Estimate Concordancy1
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Comparison of Foraminiferal, Coccolithophorid, and Radiolarian Paleotemperature Equations: Assemblage Coherency and Estimate Concordancy1
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *