Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-dfw9g Total loading time: 0.309 Render date: 2022-08-18T07:52:23.181Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Comparison of climate model results with European vegetation and permafrost during oxygen isotope stage three

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mary Jo Alfano*
Affiliation:
American Geological Institute, 4220 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22302, USA
Eric J. Barron
Affiliation:
EMS Environment Institute, 2217 Earth-Engineering Sciences Building, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
David Pollard
Affiliation:
EMS Environment Institute, 2217 Earth-Engineering Sciences Building, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Brian Huntley
Affiliation:
Environmental Research Centre, University of Durham, Department of Biological Sciences, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Judy R. M. Allen
Affiliation:
Environmental Research Centre, University of Durham, Department of Biological Sciences, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Fax: +1-703-379-7563. E-mail address: mjalfano@agiweb.org (M.J. Alfano).

Abstract

Oxygen isotope stage 3 (OIS3), an interstade between approximately 60,000 and 25,000 yr B.P., presents an ideal opportunity to compare high-resolution climate simulations with the geologic record. To facilitate this comparison, the results of a mesoscale climate model (RegCM2) embedded in the GENESIS GCM are utilized to drive a vegetation model (BIOME 3.5). The BIOME output is then compared with OIS3 compilations derived from pollen. The simulated biomes agree well with the pollen-based biomes in southern Europe; however, disagreements occur in the northern part of the domain. The most striking mismatch involves the distribution of tundra. The models fail to have tundra extend to its observed position as far south as 50°N in central Europe during OIS3. The model also fails to have permafrost extend southward to its observed position between 50°N and 55°N in western Europe during OIS3. A variety of sensitivity experiments are performed to investigate these mismatches. These experiments demonstrate the importance of annual and summer temperatures and the length of the winter season in creating improved matches between the model results and the inferred distributions of vegetation and permafrost in northern Europe.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Elsevier Science (USA)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This contribution is one of a series of articles reporting the results of the Stage 3 Project (van Andel, 2002). See the Stage 3 website for details and databases at http://www.esc.cam.ac.uk/oistage3/Details/Homepage.html.

References

Alfano, M. (2001). Modeling European Vegetation and Permafrost during Oxygen Isotope Stage Three. M.S. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, Google Scholar
Barron, E.J., and Pollard, D. High-resolution climate simulations of Oxygen Isotope Stage 3 in Europe. Quaternary Research 58, (2002). 296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLIMAP (Climate: Long-Range Investigation, Mapping and Prediction Project) Members, (1981). Seasonal Reconstructions of the Earth’s Surface at the Last Glacial Maximum. Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
de Beaulieu, J.L., and Reille, M. Long Pleistocene pollen sequences from the Velay Plateau (Massif Central, France), 1. Ribains Maar. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 1, (1992). 223 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follieri, M., Giardini, M., Magri, D., and Sadori, L. Palynostratigraphy of the last glacial period in the volcanic region of central Italy. Quaternary International 47, (1998). 3 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follieri, M., Magri, D., and Sadori, L. 250,000-Year pollen record from Valle Di Castiglione (Roma). Pollen et Spores 30, (1988). 329 356.Google Scholar
Giorgi, F., Marinucci, M.R., and Bates, G.T. Development of a second-generation regional climate model (RegCM2). I. Boundary-layer and radiative transfer processes. Monthly Weather Review 121, (1993). 2794 2813.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, F., Marinucci, M.R., de Canio, G., and Bates, G.T. Development of a second-generation regional climate model (RegCM2). II. Convective processes and assimilation of lateral boundary conditions. Monthly Weather Review 121, (1993). 2814 2832.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiot, J., Pons, A., de Beaulieu, J.L., and Reille, M. A 140,000-year continental climate reconstruction from two European pollen records. Nature (London) 338, (1989). 309 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haxeltine, A., and Prentice, I.C. BIOME3. an equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 10, (1996). 693 709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huijzer, A.S., and Isarin, R.F.B. The reconstruction of past climates using multi-proxy evidence; an example of the Weichselian pleniglacial in Northwest and Central Europe. Quaternary Science Reviews 16, (1997). 513 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huijzer, A.S., and Vandenberghe, J. Climatic reconstruction of the Weichselian Pleniglacial in northwestern and central Europe. Journal of Quaternary Science 13, (1998). 391 417.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntley, B., Tzedakis, C., de Beaulieu, J.-L., Pollard, D., Alfano, M., Allen, J., (2003). Comparison between Biome 3.5 models and pollen data. Quaternary Research, in press Google Scholar
Huybrechts, P. Basal temperature conditions of the Greenland ice sheet during the glacial cycles. Annals of Glaciology 23, (1996). 226 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbrie, J., Boyle, E.A., Clemens, S.C., Duffy, A., Howard, W.R., Kukla, G., Kutzbach, J., Martinson, D.G., McIntyre, A., Mix, A.C., Molfino, B., Morley, J.J., Peterson, L.C., Pisias, N.G., Prell, W.L., Raymo, M.E., Shackleton, N.J., and Toggweiler, J.R. On the structure and origin of major glaciation cycles; 1. Linear responses to Milankovitch forcing. Paleoceanography 7, (1992). 701 738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orvig, S. Climates of the polar regions. Landsberg, E. World Survey of Climatology. (1970). Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
Pollard, D., and Thompson, S.L. Sea-ice dynamics and CO2 sensitivity in a global climate model. Atmosphere-Ocean 32, (1994). 449 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, D., and Thompson, S.L. Use of a land-surface-transfer scheme (LSX) in a global climate model. the response to doubling stomatal resistance. Global and Planetary Change 10, (1995). 129 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reille, M., and de Beaulieu, J.L. Pollen analysis of a long upper Pleistocene continental sequence in a Velay Maar (Massif Central, France). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 80, (1990). 35 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T.M., Shugart, H.H., Woodward, F.I., (1997). Plant functional types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. in: International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme book series, Cambridge University Press, New York. p. 369.Google Scholar
Thompson, S.L., and Pollard, D. A global climate model (GENESIS) with a land surface-transfer scheme (LSX). Part 1. present-day climate. Journal of Climate 8, (1995). 732 761.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S.L., and Pollard, D. Greenland and Antarctic mass balances for present and doubled CO2 from the GENESIS version-2 global climate model. Journal of Climate 10, (1997). 871 900.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Andel, T.H. The climate and landscape of the middle part of the Weichselian glaciation in Europe. the Stage 3 Project. Quaternary Research 57, (2002). 2 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Andel, T.H., and Tzedakis, P.C. Palaeolithic landscapes of Europe and environs, 150,000–25,000 years ago; an overview. Quaternary Science Reviews 15, (1996). 481 500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Andel, T., and Tzedakis, C. Priority and opportunity. reconstructing the European Middle Palaeolithic climate and landscape. Bayley, J. Science in Archaeology. An Agenda for the Future. (1998). English Heritage, London. 37 46.Google Scholar
Watts, W.A., Allen, J.R.M., and Huntley, B. Vegetation history and palaeoclimate of the last glacial period at Lago Grande di Monticchio, southern Italy. Quaternary Science Reviews 15, (1996). 133 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woillard, G.M. Grande Pile peat bog. a continuous pollen record for the last 140,000 years. Quaternary Research 9, (1978). 1 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woillard, G.M., and Mook, W.G. Carbon-14 dates at Grande Pile. correlation of land and sea chronologies. Science 215, (1982). 159 161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Comparison of climate model results with European vegetation and permafrost during oxygen isotope stage three
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Comparison of climate model results with European vegetation and permafrost during oxygen isotope stage three
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Comparison of climate model results with European vegetation and permafrost during oxygen isotope stage three
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *