Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T03:25:13.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2022

Hiromitsu Tabeta
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Tokyo Gakugei University, Tokyo, Japan RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, Japan Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Yasuhiro Higashi
Affiliation:
RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, Japan
Yozo Okazaki
Affiliation:
RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, Japan Graduate School of Bioresources, Mie University, Tsu, Japan
Kiminori Toyooka
Affiliation:
RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, Japan
Mayumi Wakazaki
Affiliation:
RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, Japan
Mayuko Sato
Affiliation:
RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, Japan
Kazuki Saito
Affiliation:
RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, Japan
Masami Y Hirai
Affiliation:
RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, Japan
Ali Ferjani*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Tokyo Gakugei University, Tokyo, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: A. Ferjani, E-mail: ferjani@u-gakugei.ac.jp

Abstract

Mobilisation of seed storage reserves is important for seedling establishment in Arabidopsis. In this process, sucrose is synthesised from triacylglycerol via core metabolic processes. Mutants with defects in triacylglycerol-to-sucrose conversion display short etiolated seedlings. We found that whereas sucrose content in the indole-3-butyric acid response 10 (ibr10) mutant was significantly reduced, hypocotyl elongation in the dark was unaffected, questioning the role of IBR10 in this process. To dissect the metabolic complexity behind cell elongation, a quantitative-based phenotypic analysis combined with a multi-platform metabolomics approach was applied. We revealed that triacylglycerol and diacylglycerol breakdown were disrupted in ibr10, resulting in low sugar content and poor photosynthetic ability. Importantly, batch-learning self-organised map clustering revealed that threonine level was correlated with hypocotyl length. Consistently, exogenous threonine supply stimulated hypocotyl elongation, indicating that sucrose levels are not always correlated with etiolated seedling length, suggesting the contribution of amino acids in this process.

Type
Original Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The John Innes Centre

1. Introduction

Seedling establishment is an important event in the plant life cycle, orchestrated by transcription factors and enzymes and sustained by a number of low molecular weight compounds. The regulation of hypocotyl development during germination is a complex process, in which many factors must be coordinated temporally and spatially. In Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis, hereafter), sucrose (Suc) is synthesised from the triacylglycerol (TAG) of the oil bodies via a sequence of metabolic reactions including core β-oxidation, glyoxylate and TCA cycles, and cytosolic gluconeogenesis, and Suc is used to replenish energy supply during seedling development (Graham, Reference Graham2008).

In a process called lipolysis, SUGAR DEPENDENT1 splits TAG into glycerol and free fatty acids (FAs), which are transported into peroxisomes by the PEROXISOMAL ABC TRANSPORTER 1, where they bind CoA and undergo degradation in the β-oxidation cycle (Eastmond, Reference Eastmond2006; Fulda et al., Reference Fulda, Schnurr, Abbadi, Heinz and Browse2004; Hu et al., Reference Hu, Baker, Bartel, Linka, Mullen, Reumann and Zolman2012). The latter represents a relatively early step in the TAG-to-Suc conversion. A number of loss-of-function mutants defective in this process, such as ped1, are unviable unless supplied with an exogenous carbon source, indicating that seedling establishment in Arabidopsis depends on the above metabolic process before photosynthetic capacity is acquired (Germain et al., Reference Germain, Rylott, Larson, Sherson, Bechtold, Carde, Bryce, Graham and Smith2001; Graham, Reference Graham2008; Hayashi et al., Reference Hayashi, Toriyama, Kondo and Nishimura1998).

Mutations in enzymes catalysing TAG-to-Suc conversion often result in etiolated seedlings with short hypocotyls. More specifically, ISOCITRATE LYASE (ICL; Eastmond et al., Reference Eastmond, Germain, Lange, Bryce, Smith and Graham2000) and MALATE SYNTHASE (MLS; Cornah et al., Reference Cornah, Germain, Ward, Beale and Smith2004) play important roles in the glyoxylate cycle. In addition, PHOSPHOENOLPYRUVATE CARBOXYKINASE1 (PCK1; Penfield et al., Reference Penfield, Rylott, Gilday, Graham, Larson and Graham2004) and, more recently, the vacuolar H+-PPase/FUGU5/AVP1 (Ferjani et al., Reference Ferjani, Segami, Horiguchi, Muto, Maeshima and Tsukaya2011) were reported to be involved in gluconeogenesis. Collectively, genetic contexts with a molecular lesion in one of the above genes ultimately produce less Suc from TAG during seed germination (Cornah et al., Reference Cornah, Germain, Ward, Beale and Smith2004; Eastmond et al., Reference Eastmond, Germain, Lange, Bryce, Smith and Graham2000; Ferjani et al., Reference Ferjani, Segami, Horiguchi, Muto, Maeshima and Tsukaya2011; Penfield et al., Reference Penfield, Rylott, Gilday, Graham, Larson and Graham2004; Takahashi et al., Reference Takahashi, Morimoto, Tabeta, Asaoka, Ishida, Maeshima, Tsukaya and Ferjani2017). For instance, whereas icl-2, mls-2, pck1-2 and fugu5-1 mutants exhibit dissimilar metabolic perturbations, albeit with variable penetrance (Ferjani et al., Reference Ferjani, Kawade, Asaoka, Oikawa, Okada, Mochizuki, Maeshima, Hirai, Saito and Tsukaya2018), they share a phenotypic signature, that is, a short hypocotyl in the dark (Ferjani et al., Reference Ferjani, Segami, Horiguchi, Muto, Maeshima and Tsukaya2011; Takahashi et al., Reference Takahashi, Morimoto, Tabeta, Asaoka, Ishida, Maeshima, Tsukaya and Ferjani2017).

A metabolic disorder in TAG-to-Suc conversion concomitant with lowered Suc levels triggers Class II compensation in cotyledons (Takahashi et al., Reference Takahashi, Morimoto, Tabeta, Asaoka, Ishida, Maeshima, Tsukaya and Ferjani2017). Compensation is a phenotype whereby decreased cell numbers in determinate organs, such as cotyledons and leaves, trigger a cell size increase (Ferjani et al., Reference Ferjani, Horiguchi, Yano and Tsukaya2007; Horiguchi et al., Reference Horiguchi, Ferjani, Fujikura and Tsukaya2006; Horiguchi & Tsukaya, Reference Horiguchi and Tsukaya2011; Tsukaya, Reference Tsukaya2002; Reference Tsukaya2008). Therefore, low Suc production often results in reduced cell proliferation activity and thus a reduced cell number in cotyledons due to a low energy state. Importantly, we discovered that indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) response 10 mutants (ibr10-1; Zolman et al., Reference Zolman, Martinez, Millius, Adham and Bartel2008; ibr10-2; Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021) also exhibit Class II compensation. Together with IBR1 and IBR3, IBR10 is involved in the conversion of IBA to indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and the tuning of auxin homeostasis (Frick & Strader, Reference Frick and Strader2018; Korasick et al., Reference Korasick, Enders and Strader2013; Spiess et al., Reference Spiess, Hausman, Yu, Cohen, Rampey and Zolman2014; Strader et al., Reference Strader, Wheeler, Christensen, Berens, Cohen, Rampey and Bartel2011; Zolman et al., Reference Zolman, Nyberg and Bartel2007; Reference Zolman, Martinez, Millius, Adham and Bartel2008).

Previous studies suggested that the above IBR enzymes catalyse conversion of IBA-CoA to IAA-CoA in a metabolic process resembling peroxisomal β-oxidation and proposed that they are not dedicated to the production of Suc from TAG (Strader et al., Reference Strader, Wheeler, Christensen, Berens, Cohen, Rampey and Bartel2011). While ibr10 exhibited Class II compensation, ibr1-2 and ibr3-1 mutants did not show cell number reduction or compensated cell enlargement in cotyledons (Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021; Takahashi et al., Reference Takahashi, Morimoto, Tabeta, Asaoka, Ishida, Maeshima, Tsukaya and Ferjani2017). Altogether, the above findings suggest a previously unrecognised role of IBR10 in TAG mobilisation, functionally distinct from IBR1 and IBR3 during seedling establishment.

To date, the short hypocotyl phenotype has been ascribed to lowered Suc production during seed germination (Graham, Reference Graham2008; Strader et al., Reference Strader, Wheeler, Christensen, Berens, Cohen, Rampey and Bartel2011). While mutants with defects in TAG-to-Suc conversion display short hypocotyls due to limited Suc availability (Cornah et al., Reference Cornah, Germain, Ward, Beale and Smith2004; Eastmond et al., Reference Eastmond, Germain, Lange, Bryce, Smith and Graham2000; Ferjani et al., Reference Ferjani, Segami, Horiguchi, Muto, Maeshima and Tsukaya2011; Penfield et al., Reference Penfield, Rylott, Gilday, Graham, Larson and Graham2004), hypocotyl elongation of ibr10 etiolated seedlings was unaffected despite a 40% reduction in Suc content compared with the wild type (WT) (Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021). This counter-intuitive phenotype suggests that the length of hypocotyls does not necessarily reflect endogenous Suc content, suggesting the presence of other compounds involved in the regulation of this complex trait.

Discrepancy among ibr10 and other related mutant phenotypes has led to reconsideration of the physiological function of Suc in seedling establishment (Henninger et al., Reference Henninger, Pedrotti, Krischke, Draken, Wildenhain, Fekete, Rolland, Müller, Fröschel, Weiste and Dröge-Laser2021; Silva et al., Reference Silva, Ligterink and Hilhorst2017). This study, in which a multi-platform metabolome analysis combined with bioinformatics approaches was adopted to unveil the function of IBR10, attempts to tackle this long-standing debate.

2. Results

2.1. ibr10 mutants exhibit significant metabolic changes compared with ibr1 and ibr3

To address the above question, we performed a wide-target metabolome analysis using gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC-QqQ-MS) to assess whether metabolic profiles differ among the ibr mutants. To visualise the extent of metabolic changes, we performed principal component analysis (PCA). Our results revealed that while ibr10-1 was significantly separated compared with the two other ibr mutant counterparts in PC1 (46.6%) (Figure 1a), the WT was slightly separated in PC2 (10.1%) and other PC axis combinations (Figure 1a). Interestingly, ibr1-2 and ibr3-1 displayed the same behaviour in all PC axis combinations, indicating that these two mutants share common metabolic profiles (Figure 1a). To explore the metabolome data and typical metabolite deviation, we performed hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) and categorised four different clusters (C1–C4). Consistently, HCA indicated that ibr1-2 and ibr3-1 had no obvious metabolic changes (Figure 1b). Interestingly, the largest cluster, C4, was enriched with sugars and organic acids, the amounts of which were significantly inferior in ibr10-1 compared with the WT (Figure 1b; Supplemental Table S1). Note that a similar trend was observed for some amino acids detected by GC-QqQ-MS (Supplemental Table S1).

Fig. 1. Metabolic changes in TAG-to-Suc conversion in ibr mutants. (a) Principal component analysis plot for ibr mutants. Metabolome analysis was performed by GC-QqQ-MS using etiolated seedlings at 3 DAI. All 108 metabolites detected by GC-QqQ-MS were used in the PCA (n = 6). PC1–PC4 are described. (b) Hierarchical clustering analysis of each genotype. Data are Z-scores of the average content relative to that of the quality control samples (n = 6) at 3 DAI. (c) Venn diagrams for each mutant line. Each number represents the metabolites with a significantly changed content compared with the WT, as determined by Student’s t-test (n = 6, p < 0.05). Factors shown in the black box are significantly different in all mutants compared with the WT. DAI, days after induction of seed germination.

In addition, the Venn diagram summarising the metabolic changes among the above ibr mutants indicated that only ibr10 exhibited significant differences in terms of the number of metabolites compared with the WT (Figure 1c). Provided that each mutant had a slightly downregulated rate of IBA-to-IAA conversion in the peroxisome during the early developmental phase (Frick & Strader, Reference Frick and Strader2018; Korasick et al., Reference Korasick, Enders and Strader2013; Spiess et al., Reference Spiess, Hausman, Yu, Cohen, Rampey and Zolman2014; Strader et al., Reference Strader, Wheeler, Christensen, Berens, Cohen, Rampey and Bartel2011; Zolman et al., Reference Zolman, Nyberg and Bartel2007; Reference Zolman, Martinez, Millius, Adham and Bartel2008), changes in 18 selected metabolites in all ibr mutants implicate roles in β-oxidation and/or IBA conversion (Figure 1c). Together, our findings indicated that only ibr10-1 has a remarkable metabolic alteration among all ibr mutants, suggesting a distinct role of IBR10 in seed nutrient reserve mobilisation and a link between such metabolic profiles and the abovementioned cotyledon phenotypes.

2.2. Sugar levels were reduced in ibr10 mutants

To investigate the metabolic alterations in ibr10 mutants, we conducted GC-QqQ-MS wide-target analysis using two different alleles: ibr10-1 (Zolman et al., Reference Zolman, Martinez, Millius, Adham and Bartel2008) and ibr10-2 (SALK_201893C; Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021). Our data indicated that ibr10-1 and ibr10-2 shared ~70% of the total metabolic changes (Supplemental Figure S1). More specifically, 146 metabolites stably detected in the GC-QqQ-MS wide-target analysis were categorised into seven clusters (C1–C7) based on their behaviour (Figure 2a). Among them, the amounts of the C3 metabolites, mostly sugars and organic acids, were lower in the ibr10 mutants than in the WT (Figure 2b), consistent with the independent data sets described above (see Figure 1b).

Fig. 2. GC-MS/MS metabolome analysis in ibr10 mutants. (a) Hierarchical clustering analysis of ibr10-1 and ibr10-2. All 146 metabolites detected by GC-QqQ-MS were categorised into seven clusters (C1–C7) based on behaviour. Data are Z-scores of the average content relative to that of the quality control samples (n = 6) of 3 DAI etiolated seedlings. (b) Pathway analysis in the ibr10 mutants. Primary metabolites related to TAG-to-Suc conversion are plotted on the corresponding metabolic pathway. Data are means + standard deviation (SD) (n = 6) of 3 DAI etiolated seedlings. (c) Volcano plot for ibr10-1. p-values determined by Student’s t-test for WT and ibr10-1 comparisons. Fold change (FC) values were determined for ibr10-1 relative to the WT. Red dots represent metabolites significantly changed between the WT and ibr10-1 (n = 6). DAI, days after induction of seed germination.

Next, we overlaid the profiles of primary metabolites on the corresponding metabolic pathways, focusing on the carbon flow, assuming that this stage of seedling development is characterised by TAG-to-Suc conversion. As shown in Figure 2b, while the levels of metabolites related to the TCA and glyoxylate cycles were either unchanged or slightly reduced, Suc contents were reduced by almost 40% (Figure 2b; Supplemental Table S1). Furthermore, other sugars such as glucose, galactose and fructose were similarly reduced in both ibr10 alleles (Figure 2b).

Then, the metabolites that were significantly increased or decreased in ibr10 mutants compared with the WT were further selected by volcano plot analysis. This revealed that adipic acid-2TMS was the most highly accumulated in ibr10-1 compared with the WT (Figure 2c). Since adipic acid, an important commercial dicarboxylic acid, is a platform chemical that may be linked to β-oxidation (Skoog et al., Reference Skoog, Shin, Saez-Jimenez, Mapelli and Olsson2018), its accumulation in only ibr10 (Figure 1b) may reflect a TAG-to-Suc mobilisation disorder. In addition, volcano plot analysis revealed that the metabolites that were decreased were mostly sugars and organic acids (Supplemental Table S2). Taken together, these results indicate that β-oxidation and carbon flux were specifically affected in ibr10, but not in ibr1-2 or ibr3-1. These findings also indicate that the diminished Suc production in ibr10 mutants is simply due to a lower supply of carbon source from TAG degradation, in agreement with our previous report (Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021).

2.3. TAG degradation defects were observed in ibr10 mutants

Metabolic profiling indicated that ibr10 accumulated less sugars and organic acids (Figure 2), suggesting that defects in TAG mobilisation occurred upstream of this pathway. Provided that TAG degradation was nearly complete at 4 DAI (Ferjani et al., Reference Ferjani, Segami, Horiguchi, Muto, Maeshima and Tsukaya2011), LC-qTOF-MS non-target lipidomic analysis was performed to formally test the above hypothesis at this critical stage.

PCA plots depict the differences between the WT and ibr10 mutants in both negative and positive modes of LC-qTOF-MS (Figure 3a). Consistently, both ibr10 mutant alleles showed similar lipidomic changes, confirming the results obtained above by GC-QqQ-MS analysis (Figure 3a). It is of note that the lipid profiles of dry seeds of the WT and two ibr10 mutant alleles (i.e., prior to seed imbibition) were identical (Figure 3a). Together, these results unambiguously indicated that the metabolic disorders mentioned above occurred after seed imbibition and are likely associated with defects related to TAG degradation and subsequent steps.

Fig. 3. LC-qTOF-MS lipidomic analysis in ibr10 mutants. (a) PCA plot for the ibr mutants. Lipidomic analysis was performed by LC-qTOF-MS non-target analysis using dry seeds (n = 3) and etiolated seedlings (n = 6) at 3 DAI. Each PCA represents a positive and negative mode of liquid chromatography condition. In total, 156 and 161 metabolites were detected in the positive and negative modes, respectively. (b) Volcano plot for ibr10-1. p-values were calculated by Student’s t-test for WT and ibr10-1 comparisons. Fold change (FC) values were determined for ibr10-1 relative to the WT. Red dots represent metabolites significantly changed between the WT and ibr10-1 (n = 6). DAI, days after induction of seed germination.

Based on the above findings, we next attempted to confirm the changes in lipids in detail in ibr10. For this, we performed HCA, which revealed that several lipid species were altered in ibr10, particularly in the bottom cluster (in both positive and negative modes), in which TAG, DAG and membrane lipids were enriched (Supplemental Figure S2). The volcano plot further indicated that several classes of lipids tended to be higher in ibr10-1 than in the WT (Figure 3b). Next, lipids whose levels were significantly up- or downregulated were selected (Supplemental Table S3). Interestingly, we found that the highly accumulated lipids were almost exclusively TAGs and DAGs, confirming that TAG degradation was severely disrupted. Moreover, levels of monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG) and digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG), which are targeted mainly to the chloroplast, were markedly low, and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) contents tended to increase in ibr10 (Supplemental Figure S2). Collectively, these results indicate that TAG mobilisation defects in ibr10 broadly and significantly affected membrane lipid composition.

It has been reported that a lack of MGDG-to-DGDG conversion disrupts membrane structure in etioplasts (Fujii et al., Reference Fujii, Kobayashi, Nagata, Masuda and Wada2018). Because saturated DGDG is targeted mostly to protoplasts, and their contents were reduced by almost 80% in ibr10 (Figure 4a), we hypothesised that the transition from etioplast to chloroplast would also be impaired in ibr10. Quantification of soil and plant analysis development (SPAD) values, which are correlated with chlorophyll concentration (Ling et al., Reference Ling, Huang and Jarvis2011), suggests that unlike ibr1-2 and ibr3-1, ibr10 mutants display reduced chlorophyll content during the greening process (Figure 4b). Provided that SPAD values reflect chlorophyll levels via nitrate abundance, this may also suggest that TAG degradation defects caused etioplastic transition delay, which in turn led to defects in light-acquired development. Surprisingly, SPAD values measured on rosette leaves were unaffected (Supplemental Figure S3), indicating that chlorophyll content was lower only during the initial developmental phase following light exposure. Although field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) observations support TAG accumulation in ibr10, as a significant number of oil bodies remained, the lattice membrane in prolamellar bodies, a unique structure of the etioplast, did not change drastically (Figure 4c). These results suggest that altered lipid composition has a harmful effect during the etioplast–chloroplast transition.

Fig. 4. Analysis of etioplast lipid composition and structure. (a) MGDG and DGDG contents of ibr10 etiolated seedlings. Saturated lipid species were selected from lipidomic data and normalised to WT content. Data are means + SD (n = 6; 3 DAI etiolated seedlings). Asterisks indicate mutants with significant differences compared with the WT (Dunnett’s test at p < 0.05; R ver. 3.5.1). (b) Time-course changes in the SPAD values of ibr10. SPAD values were measured at each time point after light treatment (n = 5; biological replicates). Lower and upper boxes represent the first and third quartiles, and the line in the boxes represents the median. Each single biological replicate contains 10 technical replicates of 3 DAI etiolated seedlings. (c) FE-SEM images of ibr10 etiolated seedlings. Upper images represent cell structure, and the corresponding bottom images represent the prolamellar body in etioplasts of 3 DAI etiolate seedlings. Black bar = 20 $\unicode{x3bc} $ m and white bar = 0.5 $\unicode{x3bc} $ m. DAI, days after induction of seed germination; SPAD, soil and plant analysis development.

2.4. Threonine plays a key role in hypocotyl elongation

Unlike ibr1-2 and ibr3-1, the above results indicated that IBR10 has a non-negligible role in TAG mobilisation (Figure 1). Suc synthesised from TAG is used to produce ATP, which sustains seedling development during heterotrophic growth periods (Graham, Reference Graham2008). It is widely accepted that the length of hypocotyls in etiolated seedlings is related to endogenous Suc content. However, etiolated seedlings in ibr10 display a proper length (Strader et al., Reference Strader, Wheeler, Christensen, Berens, Cohen, Rampey and Bartel2011), suggesting that other metabolite(s) play a key role in this process. While icl-2, mls-2, pck1-2 and fugu5 exhibit shorter hypocotyls in the dark due to metabolic disorders in the TAG-Suc pathway (Cornah et al., Reference Cornah, Germain, Ward, Beale and Smith2004; Eastmond et al., Reference Eastmond, Germain, Lange, Bryce, Smith and Graham2000; Ferjani et al., Reference Ferjani, Segami, Horiguchi, Muto, Maeshima and Tsukaya2011; Reference Ferjani, Kawade, Asaoka, Oikawa, Okada, Mochizuki, Maeshima, Hirai, Saito and Tsukaya2018; Penfield et al., Reference Penfield, Rylott, Gilday, Graham, Larson and Graham2004), hypocotyl length in these mutants is not strictly correlated with Suc content (Figure 5a; Takahashi et al., Reference Takahashi, Morimoto, Tabeta, Asaoka, Ishida, Maeshima, Tsukaya and Ferjani2017; Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021). Note that the hypocotyl elongation defect in the above lines is fully restored upon exogenous supply of Suc (Supplemental Figure S4).

Fig. 5. Key metabolites with contents correlated with hypocotyl length. (a) Phenotypes of etiolated seedlings grown on Suc-free MS medium. Photographs were taken at 3 DAI (left panel, bar = 3 mm). The bar plot presents the means + SD of 3 DAI etiolated seedlings (n = 20). Asterisks indicate mutants with significant differences compared with the WT (Dunnett’s test at p < 0.05; R ver. 3.5.1). (b) PCA plot of Class II compensation mutants. Overall, 163 metabolites were detected by GC-QqQ-MS and analysed. Each plot represents samples (n = 4) from 3 DAI etiolated seedlings. (c) BL-SOM analysis of etiolated seedlings. All metabolites were categorised into 70 clusters based the elongation pattern of each mutant. Each box contains metabolites with similar patterns. Blue and red represent low and high amounts compared with the average values, respectively. (d) Bar graph of factors categorised in the cluster (6,6). Data indicate relative contents in each mutant line. (e) Beanplot of etiolated seedling length. Red bars represent means. Blue blocks represent MS medium data, and green blocks represent MS + 10 $\unicode{x3bc} $ M Thr data of 3 DAI etiolated seedlings (n = 20). Etiolated seedlings were significantly longer on MS + 10 $\unicode{x3bc} $ M Thr compared to Thr-free MS medium in all indicated genotypes, except the pck1-2 mutant (Student’s t-test at p < 0.05). DAI, days after induction of seed germination.

To identify candidate metabolites implicated in etiolated seedling length regulation, we conducted a comparative metabolome analysis using WT, icl-2, mls-2, pck1-2, fugu5-1 and ibr10-1 as a representative allele. In total, this analysis detected 163 metabolites using the MRM mode of GC-QqQ-MS. Collectively, PCA scatter plots (Figure 5b) and HCA analyses (Supplemental Figure S5) showed remarkable dissimilarities among the above genotypes. Pathway analysis revealed that glucose and fructose contents in mls-2 were comparable with those in the WT, indicating that these sugars are unlikely to be related to hypocotyl length (Supplemental Figure S5). However, the above approaches alone were insufficient to determine the molecular process underlying hypocotyl length regulation and/or to identify the key metabolites concerned because multiple metabolic processes, namely gluconeogenesis and the glyoxylate and TCA cycles, are affected in the above genotypes (Supplemental Figure S6). We next conducted an additional bioinformatics-based trans-omics analysis to identify such key metabolites.

To determine the relationships between phenotypes and metabolome data, batch-learning self-organised map (BL-SOM) analysis (Abe et al., Reference Abe, Kanaya, Kinouchi, Ichiba, Kozuki and Ikemura2003; Kanaya et al., Reference Kanaya, Kinouchi, Abe, Kudo, Yamada, Nishi, Mori and Ikemura2001), an approach that was first applied during metabolome and transcriptome overlay analysis (Hirai et al., Reference Hirai, Yano, Goodenowe, Kanaya, Kimura, Awazuhara, Arita, Fujiwara and Saito2004; Reference Hirai, Klein, Fujikawa, Yano, Goodenowe, Yamazaki, Kanaya, Nakamura, Kitayama, Suzuki, Sakurai, Shibata, Tokuhisa, Reichelt, Gershenzon, Papenbrock and Saito2005), was employed. Here, we used metabolome data and quantitative hypocotyl length data. Each mutant line displayed a unique fingerprint (Figure 5c); we found that length was categorised into a cluster (6,6) that included three metabolites: cytidine, ribose and threonine [(Thr); Figure 5c,d]. Interestingly, Suc was categorised into cluster (7,6), indicating that the Suc content was not correlated with hypocotyl length under our conditions.

Among the three metabolites, provided that ribose and cytidine were scarcely detected in this extraction method, the effect of the exogenous supply of Thr was assessed first at different concentrations (100 nM–1 mM). Importantly, L-Thr consistently and significantly promoted the elongation of etiolated seedling hypocotyls in the WT, at all concentrations tested so far (Supplemental Figure S7a). Surprisingly, the exogenous supply of Gly, Ser, Cys, Lys, Glu, Asp and Phe at 100 $\unicode{x3bc} $ M had no promotive effect on the elongation of etiolated seedling hypocotyls (Supplemental Figure S7b). Finally, when exogenously supplied, L-Thr enhanced hypocotyl elongation in the WT and all mutant lines (Figure 5e).

3. Discussion

Despite the abundance of data, our understanding of the mechanism of etiolated seedling elongation remains elusive. From seed imbibition until the acquisition of photosynthetic ability, TAG-derived Suc is a vital carbon and energy source that fuels seedling elongation in Arabidopsis (Graham, Reference Graham2008). We previously reported that ibr10 mutants exhibit normal etiolated seedlings, despite having a severely decreased Suc content (Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021). This discrepancy contradicts the widespread belief that Suc content is directly linked to etiolated seedling length.

While the roles of IBR1, IBR3 and IBR10 in IAA homoeostasis have been well documented (Frick & Strader, Reference Frick and Strader2018; Korasick et al., Reference Korasick, Enders and Strader2013; Spiess et al., Reference Spiess, Hausman, Yu, Cohen, Rampey and Zolman2014; Strader et al., Reference Strader, Wheeler, Christensen, Berens, Cohen, Rampey and Bartel2011), their function in TAG mobilisation has been overlooked. Surprisingly, among the three ibr mutants, only the ibr10 mutant exhibited Class II compensation (Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021). Because Class II compensation is exclusively associated with the partial failure of Suc production de novo from TAG, we extensively investigated this pathway in the ibr background.

3.1. IBR10 has an important role in TAG-to-Suc conversion

Arabidopsis mutants, even with a partial defect in Suc production from TAG, typically display short hypocotyls in the dark (Cornah et al., Reference Cornah, Germain, Ward, Beale and Smith2004; Eastmond et al., Reference Eastmond, Germain, Lange, Bryce, Smith and Graham2000; Ferjani et al., Reference Ferjani, Segami, Horiguchi, Muto, Maeshima and Tsukaya2011; Reference Ferjani, Kawade, Asaoka, Oikawa, Okada, Mochizuki, Maeshima, Hirai, Saito and Tsukaya2018; Penfield et al., Reference Penfield, Rylott, Gilday, Graham, Larson and Graham2004). However, ibr10 mutants in which Suc content was reduced by almost 40% did not follow this rule (Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021), questioning the validity of the correlation between hypocotyl length and Suc. To this end, metabolome analysis was performed to identify novel factors promoting hypocotyl elongation that may have been overlooked using conventional methods.

LC-qTOF-MS and GC-QqQ-MS analyses of major metabolites that occur during TAG-to-Suc conversion and found that IBR10 plays a critical role. Our data revealed that the levels of several metabolites in the TCA and glyoxylate cycles, as well as a number of organic acids related to these pathways, were reduced in ibr10 mutants (Figure 2b). Moreover, the overall sugar content was also reduced (Figure 2b), indicating that the loss of IBR10 activity affected TAG mobilisation. Consistently, lipidomics revealed that TAGs and DAGs remained at high levels (Figure 3; Supplemental Figure S2), suggesting that the process occurring from TAG degradation to the TCA and glyoxylate cycles is compromised in ibr10.

Whereas previous studies reported that IBR10 is localised in plant peroxisomes together with other enzymes involved in β-oxidation (Reumann et al., Reference Reumann, Babujee, Ma, Wienkoop, Siemsen, Antonicelli, Rasche, Lüder, Weckwerth and Jahn2007), its involvement in TAG mobilisation has been obscured by the normal hypocotyl length of its etiolated seedlings (Strader et al., Reference Strader, Culler, Cohen and Bartel2010; Reference Strader, Wheeler, Christensen, Berens, Cohen, Rampey and Bartel2011). Against the above background, we propose that IBR10 is indeed involved in β-oxidation, directly or indirectly, given that its loss-of-function led to TAG and DAG degradation defects. More specifically, FAs released from the TAG of the oil bodies via lipase activity are transported into peroxisomes, where they are transformed to acyl-CoA to enter the core β-oxidation cycle (Eastmond, Reference Eastmond2006; Fulda et al., Reference Fulda, Schnurr, Abbadi, Heinz and Browse2004; Graham, Reference Graham2008; Hu et al., Reference Hu, Baker, Bartel, Linka, Mullen, Reumann and Zolman2012). As adipic acid is a FA related to β-oxidation, the high accumulation of TAGs and DAGs in ibr10 (Figure 2) may have affected closely related reactions and/or transport of FAs, again suggesting a major contribution of IBR10 to lipid mobilisation. However, we were unable to identify the substrate of IBR10 in our omics-based analysis; this should be addressed in future work.

ENOYL-CoA HYDRATASE2, which is involved in both β-oxidation and TAG-Suc mobilisation (Katano et al., Reference Katano, Takahashi, Hirano, Kazama, Abe, Tsukaya and Ferjani2016; Li et al., Reference Li, Liu and Zolman2019; Strader et al., Reference Strader, Wheeler, Christensen, Berens, Cohen, Rampey and Bartel2011), may share similar functions with IBR10. It was interesting to find that ibr1-2 and ibr3-1, reported to be dedicated to IBA conversion, also displayed slight metabolic fluctuations compared with the WT (Figure 1), pointing to a yet unidentified connection between the two pathways. The peroxisome is an essential organelle in plant cells in which several vital chemical reactions take place. This study adds insight to our current understanding of IBRs and the peroxisomal metabolic network.

3.2. Missing phenotypes caused by lack of IBR10 enzyme were identified by homeostatic metabolic networks

Lipid mobilisation is an essential metabolic event during the early phase of plant developmental, not only as a source of energy but also to acquire photosynthetic ability, which involves chloroplast ultrastructural changes during the greening process. Mutants with defects in MGDG-to-DGDG conversion have a defect in etioplasts, which leads to lowered photosynthetic ability, indicating the importance of DGDG content in the transition into protoplasts and light-acquired development (Fujii et al., Reference Fujii, Kobayashi, Nagata, Masuda and Wada2018). In ibr10, sugars levels were reduced by ~40% due to peroxisomal metabolic disorder, which may also reduce the UDP-galactose used during DAG-to-MGDG conversion. Recently, Kozuka and colleagues reported that icl-2 and mls-2 mutants display low sugar contents and have a photosynthesis defect at an early developmental phase (Kozuka et al., Reference Kozuka, Sawada, Imai, Kanai, Hirai, Mano, Umehara, Nishimura, Kusaba and Nagatani2020), suggesting TAG breakdown defects affect galactolipid synthesis.

In the ibr10 mutants, a defect in lipid mobilisation likely reduced MGDG and DGDG contents by ~40% and 20–30%, respectively, mimicking the lipid composition reported previously in Fujii et al. (Reference Fujii, Kobayashi, Nagata, Masuda and Wada2018). Unexpectedly, although ibr10 exhibited an altered membrane lipid composition and low photosynthesis ability, etioplast ultrastructure was not disrupted (Figures 3b and 4b; Supplemental Figure S2). Our metabolome analysis and previous research showed that the metabolic alteration starts after 2–3 DAI (Figure 3a; Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021), indicating that TAG degradation defects after seed imbibition and their impact on MGDG and DGDG biosynthesis are exclusively post-germinative. Altogether, TAG jams at the seed imbibition stage slowed lipid mobilisation and affected galactolipids, resulting in a transition delay to the autotrophic regime, likely due to low chlorophyll contents.

Lipid homoeostasis of MGDG, DGDG, PE and PC has been discussed previously (Essigmann et al., Reference Essigmann, Guler, Narang, Linke and Benning1998; Hartel & Benning, Reference Hartel and Benning2000; Tjellstrom et al., Reference Tjellstrom, Andersson, Larsson and Sandelius2008). Our data are consistent with the above trend under the assumption that PE and PC levels were increased in ibr10 to compensate for the reduction in galactolipids (Supplemental Figure S2). Nevertheless, although oil bodies were not fully converted into sugars in ibr10, this metabolic disruption did not severely affect hypocotyl elongation. This may indicate that central metabolic flow was somehow adjusted. Arabidopsis seed storage proteins represent a second gateway fueling seedling establishment (Eastmond et al., Reference Eastmond, Astley, Parsley, Aubry, Williams, Menard, Craddock, Nunes-Nesi, Fernie and Hibberd2015). It is also possible that ibr10 mutant can generate longer hypocotyls than the other mutants because it diverts its energy from chlorophyll synthesis and chloroplast biogenesis to hypocotyl elongation. Therefore, these alternative pathways may have partially helped replenish energy shortage during ibr10 seed germination, as ibr10 failed to fully use TAG stores. Collectively, homoeostatic coordination among the different lipid species and central metabolism may have led to a new steady state compensating for the deficit in the ibr10 background, preventing a visible phenotype.

3.3. Threonine as a potential regulator of hypocotyl elongation

As mentioned above, our phenotypic analysis revealed that Suc levels do not always allow prediction of hypocotyl length in etiolated seedlings. Indeed, Suc was not categorised within the same cluster as etiolated seedling length (Figure 5c), and ibr10 displayed normal hypocotyl length (Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021). Taken together, these results suggest that other factors may control seedling development.

BL-SOM analysis identified candidate metabolites with a straightforward relationship with hypocotyl length (Figure 5c,d). Among the metabolites identified, the contents of the amino acid threonine (Thr) were positively correlated with hypocotyl length, and exogenous supply of Thr at a relatively low concentration (10 $\unicode{x3bc} $ M) significantly boosted hypocotyl elongation (Figure 5e). It is worth noting that our targeted GC-QqQ-MS analysis detected only 163 metabolites, which is a relatively low number when considering the rich plant phytochemical diversity. For instance, Arabidopsis alone has been reported to possess nearly 3,030 different metabolites, a number that may double in the future (Hawkins et al., Reference Hawkins, Ginzburg, Zhao, Dwyer, Xue, Xu, Rice, Cole, Paley, Karp and Rhee2021). This may suggest that other metabolites or Thr-related compounds not detected here may have a relatively higher biological activity in stimulating hypocotyl elongation. In other words, our findings suggest that not only sugars but also various metabolites, such as amino acids and/or organic acids, must be tightly regulated during organogenesis (Kawade et al., Reference Kawade, Horiguchi, Hirose, Oikawa, Hirai, Saito, Fujita and Tsukaya2020; Nakayama et al., Reference Nakayama, Koga, Long, Hamant and Ferjani2022).

3.4. The importance of quantitative approaches in plant development

IBR1 and IBR3 have potential functions with IBR10 in IBA-IAA conversion (Strader et al., Reference Strader, Culler, Cohen and Bartel2010; Reference Strader, Wheeler, Christensen, Berens, Cohen, Rampey and Bartel2011; Zolman et al., Reference Zolman, Nyberg and Bartel2007; Reference Zolman, Martinez, Millius, Adham and Bartel2008); etiolated seedlings in the above mutants were not affected (Zolman et al., Reference Zolman, Martinez, Millius, Adham and Bartel2008). We recently reported that ibr10 exhibits Class II compensation, which is observed in mutants with partially defective TAG-to-Suc conversion, indicating that IBR10 has a previously unrecognised function (Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021; Takahashi et al., Reference Takahashi, Morimoto, Tabeta, Asaoka, Ishida, Maeshima, Tsukaya and Ferjani2017). This is likely because ibr10 has no visible phenotype, as it is indistinguishable from the WT.

Although the holistic contributions of carbohydrates to etiolated seedling establishment and hypocotyl elongation have been investigated extensively, the molecular processes behind this important trait have not been fully determined. For decades, most studies suggested a direct link between Suc concentration and hypocotyl length (Graham, Reference Graham2008; Strader et al., Reference Strader, Wheeler, Christensen, Berens, Cohen, Rampey and Bartel2011). First, against the above background, this study provides a conceptual overview of how such questions should be approached. Second, our previous studies (Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021; Takahashi et al., Reference Takahashi, Morimoto, Tabeta, Asaoka, Ishida, Maeshima, Tsukaya and Ferjani2017), together with the quantitative trans-omic approach adopted in this study, unambiguously show that Thr promotes hypocotyl elongation in the dark. This is in full agreement with a previous report that Arabidopsis uses two gluconeogenic gateways for organic acids to fuel seedling establishment (Eastmond et al., Reference Eastmond, Astley, Parsley, Aubry, Williams, Menard, Craddock, Nunes-Nesi, Fernie and Hibberd2015).

More specifically, it has been thought for a long time that the gluconeogenic route in eukaryotes uses organic acid intermediates to produce sugars in a PCK-dependent manner. Surprisingly, radiolabelling showed that while PCK allows de novo synthesis of sugars from dicarboxylic acids, products of lipid breakdown, the cytosolic enzyme orthophosphate dikinase allows sugars to be produced from pyruvate, a major product of protein breakdown (Eastmond et al., Reference Eastmond, Astley, Parsley, Aubry, Williams, Menard, Craddock, Nunes-Nesi, Fernie and Hibberd2015). As Ala, Cys, Gly, Trp and Thr from protein reserves represent a major source of pyruvate (Eastmond et al., Reference Eastmond, Astley, Parsley, Aubry, Williams, Menard, Craddock, Nunes-Nesi, Fernie and Hibberd2015), our findings imply that hypocotyl elongation promoted by exogenous Thr supply reflects the role of storage proteins in nurturing seedlings during a skotomorphogenic developmental programme. In other words, while our data indicate that Thr can act both as an alternative energy source and a carbon source during hypocotyl elongation, further experiments are needed to determine the full molecular mechanism. This study reveals a new role of Thr in cell elongation, allowing for the first time the uncoupling of certain etiolated mechanisms using a quantitative metabolomic approach. Finally, our findings demonstrate the importance of quantitative plant biology approaches (Autran et al., Reference Autran, Bassel, Chae, Ezer, Ferjani, Fleck, Hamant, Hartmann, Jiao, Johnston, Kwiatkowska, Lim, Mahönen, Morris, Mulder, Nakayama, Sozzani, Strader, Tusscher, Ueda and Wolf2021) in depicting and visualising the unseen side(s) of plant development and provide meaningful insight into uncharacterised regulatory mechanisms.

4. Methods

4.1. Plant materials and growth conditions

The WT plant used in this study was Columbia-0 (Col-0), and all the mutants were based on the Col-0 background. ibr1–2, ibr3–1 and ibr10–1 seeds were a gift from Professor Bonnie Bartel (Rice University). icl–2, mls–2 and pck1–2 mutant seeds were a gift from Professor Ian Graham (The University of York). ibr10-2 was obtained from Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC/The Ohio State University).

Sterilised seeds were sown on Suc-free Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Wako Pure Chemical) or MS medium with 2% (w/v) Suc where indicated. 0.1% (w/v) 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES) was added, the pH was adjusted to 5.8 with KOH, and then the medium was solidified with 0.2–0.5% (w/v) gellan gum (Murashige & Skoog, Reference Murashige and Skoog1962) in order to determine the effects of medium composition on phenotype. Stock solutions of L-threonine (Thr) and L-serine (Ser; Sigma-Aldrich), or glycine (Gly), L-Cysteine (Cys), L(+)-Lysine (Lys), L(+)-Glutamine (Glu), L-Aspartic Acid (Asp) and L(-)-Phenylalanine (Phe) (Wako Pure Chemical) were filter sterilised and added to Suc-free MS medium at the indicated final concentrations. The seeds were sown on the MS plates, which were then stored at 4°C in the dark for 3 days. After cold treatment, the seedlings were grown in the dark for the designated durations. icl–2, mls–2, pck1–2, ibr1–2, ibr3–1, ibr10–1 and ibr10–2 were genotyped and characterised as described previously (Cornah et al., Reference Cornah, Germain, Ward, Beale and Smith2004; Eastmond et al., Reference Eastmond, Germain, Lange, Bryce, Smith and Graham2000; Penfield et al., Reference Penfield, Rylott, Gilday, Graham, Larson and Graham2004; Strader et al., Reference Strader, Wheeler, Christensen, Berens, Cohen, Rampey and Bartel2011; Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021; Takahashi et al., Reference Takahashi, Morimoto, Tabeta, Asaoka, Ishida, Maeshima, Tsukaya and Ferjani2017).

4.2. Microscopy

Photographs of gross plant phenotypes at 3 DAI were taken using a stereoscopic microscope (M165FC; Leica Microsystems) connected to a CCD camera (DFC300FX; Leica Microsystems).

For electron microscopy, samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in 50 mM sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 1 hr in the dark (covered with aluminum foil) and for 1.5 hr in the light at room temperature. Then, the samples were post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in 50 mM cacodylate buffer for 2 hr at room temperature. After dehydration in a graded methanol series (25, 50, 75, 90 and 100%), the samples were embedded in Epon812 resin (TAAB). Ultrathin sections (100 nm) were generated using a diamond knife on an ultramicrotome (Leica EM UC7, Leica Microsystems) and placed on a glass slide. The sections were stained with 0.4% uranyl acetate for 12 min followed by lead stain solution (Sigma-Aldrich) for 3 min and coated with osmium under an osmium coater (HPC-1SW, Vacuum Device). The sections were observed using the FE-SEM SU8220 (Hitachi High Technology) with an yttrium aluminum garnet backscattered electron detector at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.

4.3. Wide-target metabolome analysis of GC-QqQ-MS

Etiolated seedlings at 3 DAI were collected in one tube in liquid nitrogen and freeze-dried. The samples were extracted using a bead shocker in a 2 mL tube with 5 mm zirconia beads and 80% MeOH for 2 min at 1,000 rpm (Shake Master NEO, Biomedical Sciences). The extracted solutions were centrifuged at 104 g for 1 min, and 100 $\unicode{x3bc} $ L centrifuged solution and 10 $\unicode{x3bc} $ L 0.2 mg/mL Adonitol (Internal Standard; I.S.) were dispensed in a 1.5 mL tube. After drying the solution using a centrifuge evaporator (Speed vac, Thermo), 100 $\unicode{x3bc} $ L Mox reagent (2% methoxyamine in pyridine, Thermo) was added to the 1.5 mL tube, and the metabolites were methoxylated at 30°C and 1,200 rpm for approximately 6 hr using a Thermo shaker (BSR-MSC100, Biomedical Sciences). After methoxylation, 50 $\unicode{x3bc} $ L 1% v/v of trimethylchlorosilane (TMS, Thermo) was added to the 1.5 mL tube. For TMS derivatisation, the mixture was incubated for 30 min at 1,200 rpm at 37°C as described above.

Finally, 50 $\unicode{x3bc} $ L of the derivatised samples was dispensed in vials for GC-QqQ-MS analysis (AOC-5000 Plus with GCMS-TQ8040, Shimadzu Corporation). Raw data collection was performed using the GCMS software solution (Shimadzu Corporation). Calculation of the peak area values was conducted using MRMPROBS (Tsugawa et al., Reference Tsugawa, Arita, Kanazawa, Ogiwara, Bamba and Fukusaki2013; Reference Tsugawa, Kanazawa, Ogiwara and Arita2014a; Reference Tsugawa, Ohta, Izumi, Ogiwara, Yukihira, Bamba, Fukusaki and Arita2014b). Peak areas were normalised using a quality control sample and LOWESS/Spline normalisation tool (Tsugawa et al., Reference Tsugawa, Kanazawa, Ogiwara and Arita2014a). Detailed GC-MS/MS parameters were as described previously (Tabeta et al., Reference Tabeta, Watanabe, Fukuda, Gunji, Asaoka, Hirai, Seo, Tsukaya and Ferjani2021). MRM transition information is shown in Supplemental Table S4.

4.4. Lipidome analysis using LC-qTOF-MS

0.8 mg (DW) of mature seeds (50 dry seeds per sample) or 50 etiolated seedlings grown under complete darkness on Suc-free MS medium were used as the starting material for lipidomic analysis. Dry seeds (three biological replicates) or etiolated seedlings (six biological replicates) placed in a 2-mL centrifuge tube were mixed with an 800-fold volume of extraction solvent [methyl tert-butyl ether/methanol = 3/1 (v/v) containing 1 $\unicode{x3bc} $ M 1,2-didecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, Sigma-Aldrich], and milled by shaking at 900 rpm at 4°C for 5 min on the Shake Master Neo (BMS, Tokyo, Japan) using zirconia beads. A 200-fold volume of water was added to the homogenate. After vigorous stirring on a vortex mixer and dark incubation for 15 min on ice, the homogenate was centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 5 min. The upper layer (200 $\unicode{x3bc} $ L) was transferred to a new 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube. The organic phase was evaporated to dryness using a centrifugal concentrator (ThermoSavant SPD2010, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at room temperature. The residue was dissolved in 250 $\unicode{x3bc} $ L ethanol and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min. Then, 200 $\unicode{x3bc} $ L of the supernatant was transferred to a vial with a glass insert for performing LC-MS/MS analysis. The method for LC-MS analysis was described previously (Okazaki & Saito, Reference Okazaki and Saito2018).

4.5. SPAD measurement

Plants were cultured as described above, and etiolated seedlings were placed under the light to develop etioplasts into chloroplasts. SPAD values were recorded at 4, 6 and 12 hr using the cotyledons of etiolated seedlings (Konica-Minolta, Japan, SPAD-502 plus). Single data described as one replicate contained 10–11 technical replicates using 10 etiolated seedlings.

4.6. Bioinformatics analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test or Dennett’s test (R ver. 3.5.1; R Core Team, 2018). Multiple comparisons were performed using the multcomp package (Hothorn et al., Reference Hothorn, Bretz and Westfall2008). PCA plots were calculated and designed in MetaboAnalyst4 (Chong et al., Reference Chong, Wishart and Xia2019). Venn diagrams were designed using Venny 2.1 (Oliveros, Reference Oliveros2007–2015). HCAs were performed using the pheatmap package (Kolde, Reference Kolde2019). Pathway analysis was performed using VANTED software (Rohn et al., Reference Rohn, Junker, Hartmann, Grafahrend-Belau, Treutler, Klapperstück, Czauderna, Klukas and Schreiber2012) and the KEGG database (Kanehisa, Reference Kanehisa2002; Kanehisa & Goto, Reference Kanehisa and Goto2000; Okuda et al., Reference Okuda, Yamada, Hamajima, Itoh, Katayama, Bork, Goto and Kanehisa2008). BL-SOM analysis was performed using the simple SOM programme (Abe et al., Reference Abe, Kanaya, Kinouchi, Ichiba, Kozuki and Ikemura2003; Kanaya et al., Reference Kanaya, Kinouchi, Abe, Kudo, Yamada, Nishi, Mori and Ikemura2001). Bean plots were performed using the beanplot package (Kampstra, Reference Kampstra2008). Calculation of log10 p-values and log2 fold change values for the volcano plots, p-values for the Venn diagram and autoscaling sample data for HCA were conducted using MetaboAnalyst4 and 5 (Chong et al., Reference Chong, Wishart and Xia2019).

Acknowledgements

We thank Kouji Takano (RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science) for his technical assistance with LC-qTOF-MS analysis. We thank Dr. Kensuke Kawade (NIBB) and Dr. Takashi Nobusawa (Hiroshima University) for critical reading of the manuscript and valuable comments. We thank Prof. Ian Graham (The University of York) and Dr. Alison Gilday (The University of York) for providing icl–2, mls–2 and pck1–2 mutant seeds. We also thank Professor Bonnie Bartel (Rice University) and Dr. Lucia C. Strader (Duke University) for providing ibr1-2, ibr3-1 and ibr10-1 seeds.

Financial support

This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (16H04803 to AF); Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (25113002 to AF; 25113010 to MYH); Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (18H05487 to AF). H. Tabeta is a recipient of a Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (DC1) (20J20901).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authorship contributions

H.T. performed the experiments, collected and analysed the data, and drafted the article. Y.H. and Y.O. performed lipidomics data collection. K.T, M.W. and M.S. performed FE-SEM analysis. K.S. and M.Y.H. directed and funded the study. A.F. conceived the project, designed, supervised, funded the study and wrote the paper with input from all co-authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Supplementary Materials

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/qpb.2022.19.

Footnotes

The author responsible for the distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article by the policy described in the Instructions for Authors is Ali Ferjani (ferjani@u-gakugei.ac.jp).

References

Abe, T., Kanaya, S., Kinouchi, M., Ichiba, Y., Kozuki, T., & Ikemura, T. (2003). Informatics for unveiling hidden genome signatures. Genome Research, 13, 693702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Autran, D., Bassel, W., Chae, E., Ezer, D., Ferjani, A., Fleck, C., Hamant, O., Hartmann, F., Jiao, Y., Johnston, I., Kwiatkowska, D., Lim, B., Mahönen, A., Morris, R., Mulder, B., Nakayama, N., Sozzani, R., Strader, L., Tusscher, K., Ueda, M., & Wolf, S. (2021). What is quantitative plant biology? Quantitative Plant Biology, 2, E10. https://doi.org/10.1017/qpb.2021.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, J., Wishart, D. S., & Xia, J. (2019). Using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 for comprehensive and integrative metabolomics data analysis. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 68, e86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornah, J. E., Germain, V., Ward, J. L., Beale, M. H., & Smith, S. M. (2004). Lipid utilization, gluconeogenesis, and seedling growth in Arabidopsis mutants lacking the glyoxylate cycle enzyme malate synthase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279, 4291642923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastmond, P. J. (2006). SUGAR-DEPENDENT1 encodes a patatin domain triacylglycerol lipase that initiates storage oil breakdown in germinating Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Cell, 18, 665675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastmond, P. J., Astley, H. M., Parsley, K., Aubry, S., Williams, B. P., Menard, G. N., Craddock, C. P., Nunes-Nesi, A., Fernie, A. R., & Hibberd, J. M. (2015). Arabidopsis uses two gluconeogenic gateways for organic acids to fuel seedling establishment. Nature Communications, 6, 6659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastmond, P. J., Germain, V., Lange, P. R., Bryce, J. H., Smith, S. M., & Graham, I. A. (2000). Postgerminative growth and lipid catabolism in oilseeds lacking the glyoxylate cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 56695674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Essigmann, B., Guler, S., Narang, R. A., Linke, D., & Benning, C. (1998). Phosphate availability affects the thylakoid lipid composition and the expression of SQD1, a gene required for sulfolipid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 19501995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferjani, A., Horiguchi, G., Yano, S., & Tsukaya, H. (2007). Analysis of leaf development in fugu mutants of Arabidopsis reveals three compensation modes that modulate cell expansion in determinate organs. Plant Physiology, 144, 988999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferjani, A., Kawade, K., Asaoka, M., Oikawa, A., Okada, T., Mochizuki, A., Maeshima, M., Hirai, M. Y., Saito, K., & Tsukaya, H. (2018). Pyrophosphate inhibits gluconeogenesis by restricting UDP-glucose formation in vivo . Scientific Reports, 8, 14696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferjani, A., Segami, S., Horiguchi, G., Muto, Y., Maeshima, M., & Tsukaya, H. (2011). Keep an eye on PPi: The vacuolar-type H+-pyrophosphatase regulates postgerminative development in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell, 23, 28952908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frick, E. M., & Strader, L. C. (2018). Roles for IBA-derived auxin in plant development. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69, 169177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujii, S., Kobayashi, K., Nagata, N., Masuda, T., & Wada, H. (2018). Digalactosyldiacylglycerol is essential for organization of the membrane structure in etioplasts. Plant Physiology, 177, 14871497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulda, M., Schnurr, J., Abbadi, A., Heinz, E., & Browse, J. (2004). Peroxisomal acyl-CoA synthetase activity is essential for seedling development in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Cell, 16, 394405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Germain, V., Rylott, E. L., Larson, T. R., Sherson, S. M., Bechtold, N., Carde, J. P., Bryce, J. H., Graham, I. A., & Smith, S. M. (2001). Requirement for 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase-2 in peroxisome development, fatty acid β-oxidation and breakdown of triacylglycerol in lipid bodies of Arabidopsis seedlings. The Plant Journal, 28, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, I. A. (2008). Seed storage oil mobilization. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 115142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartel, H., & Benning, C. (2000). Can digalactosyldiacylglycerol substitute for phosphatidylcholine upon phosphate deprivation in leaves and roots of Arabidopsis? Biochemical Society Transactions, 28, 729732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, C., Ginzburg, D., Zhao, K., Dwyer, W., Xue, B., Xu, A., Rice, S., Cole, B., Paley, S., Karp, P., & Rhee, S. Y. (2021). Plant metabolic network 15: A resource of genome-wide metabolism databases for 126 plants and algae. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 63, 18881905. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13163 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayashi, M., Toriyama, K., Kondo, M., & Nishimura, M. (1998). 2,4-Dichlorophenoxybutyric acid-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis have defects in glyoxysomal fatty acid β-oxidation. Plant Cell, 10, 183195.Google ScholarPubMed
Henninger, M., Pedrotti, L., Krischke, M., Draken, J., Wildenhain, T., Fekete, A., Rolland, F., Müller, M. J., Fröschel, C., Weiste, C., & Dröge-Laser, W. (2021). The evolutionarily conserved kinase SnRK1 orchestrates resource mobilization during Arabidopsis seedling establishment. Plant Cell, 34, 616632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirai, M. Y., Klein, M., Fujikawa, Y., Yano, M., Goodenowe, D. B., Yamazaki, Y., Kanaya, S., Nakamura, Y., Kitayama, M., Suzuki, H., Sakurai, N., Shibata, D., Tokuhisa, J., Reichelt, M., Gershenzon, J., Papenbrock, J., & Saito, K. (2005). Elucidation of gene-to-gene and metabolite-to-gene networks in Arabidopsis by integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 280, 2559025595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirai, M. Y., Yano, M., Goodenowe, D. B., Kanaya, S., Kimura, T., Awazuhara, M., Arita, M., Fujiwara, T., & Saito, K. (2004). Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics for understanding of global responses to nutritional stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 1020510210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horiguchi, G., Ferjani, A., Fujikura, U., & Tsukaya, H. (2006). Coordination of cell proliferation and cell expansion in the control of leaf size in Arabidopsis thaliana . Journal of Plant Research, 119, 3742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horiguchi, G., & Tsukaya, H. (2011). Organ size regulation in plants: Insights from compensation. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2, 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50, 346363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, J., Baker, A., Bartel, B., Linka, N., Mullen, R. T., Reumann, S., & Zolman, B. K. (2012). Plant peroxisomes: Biogenesis and function. Plant Cell, 24, 22792303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kampstra, P. (2008). Beanplot: A boxplot alternative for visual comparison of distributions. Journal of Statistical Software, Code Snippets, 28, 19. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v28/c01/ Google Scholar
Kanaya, S., Kinouchi, M., Abe, T., Kudo, Y., Yamada, Y., Nishi, T., Mori, H., & Ikemura, T. (2001). Analysis of codon usage diversity of bacterial genes with a self-organizing map (SOM): Characterization of horizontally transferred genes with emphasis on the E. coli O157 genome. Gene, 276, 8999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanehisa, M. (2002). The KEGG database. Novartis Foundation Symposium, 247, 91101; discussion 101-103, 119-128, 244–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanehisa, M., & Goto, S. (2000). KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 28, 2730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katano, M., Takahashi, K., Hirano, T., Kazama, Y., Abe, T., Tsukaya, H., & Ferjani, A. (2016). Suppressor screen and phenotype analyses revealed an emerging role of the monofunctional peroxisomal enoyl-CoA hydratase 2 in compensated cell enlargement. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawade, K., Horiguchi, G., Hirose, Y., Oikawa, A., Hirai, M. Y., Saito, K., Fujita, T., & Tsukaya, H. (2020). Metabolic control of gametophore shoot formation through arginine in the moss Physcomitrium patens . Cell Reports, 32, 108127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolde, O. (2019). pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1.0.12. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap Google Scholar
Korasick, D. A., Enders, T. A., & Strader, L. C. (2013). Auxin biosynthesis and storage forms. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64, 25412555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kozuka, T., Sawada, Y., Imai, H., Kanai, M., Hirai, Y. M., Mano, S., Umehara, M., Nishimura, M., Kusaba, M., & Nagatani, A. (2020). Regulation of sugar and storage oil metabolism by phytochrome during de-etiolation. Plant Physiology, 182, 11141129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Zolman, B. K. (2019). Metabolic alterations in the enoyl-CoA hydratase 2 mutant disrupt peroxisomal pathways in seedlings. Plant Physiology, 180, 18601876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ling, Q., Huang, W., & Jarvis, P. (2011). Use of a SPAD-502 meter to measure leaf chlorophyll concentration in Arabidopsis thaliana . Photosynthesis Research, 107, 209214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakayama, H., Koga, H., Long, Y., Hamant, O., & Ferjani, A. (2022). Looking beyond the gene network – Metabolic and mechanical cell drivers of leaf morphogenesis. Journal of Cell Science, 135, jcs259611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okazaki, Y., & Saito, K. (2018). Plant lipidomics using UPLC-QTOFMS. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1778, 157169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuda, S., Yamada, T., Hamajima, M., Itoh, M., Katayama, T., Bork, P., Goto, S., & Kanehisa, M. (2008). KEGG atlas mapping for global analysis of metabolic pathways. Nucleic Acids Research, 36, W423W426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveros, J. C. (2007–2015) Venny. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn’s diagrams. https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html Google Scholar
Penfield, S., Rylott, E. L., Gilday, A. D., Graham, S., Larson, T. R., & Graham, I. A. (2004). Reserve mobilization in the Arabidopsis endosperm fuels hypocotyl elongation in the dark, is independent of abscisic acid, and requires PHOSPHOENOLPYRUVATE CARBOXYKINASE1. Plant Cell, 16, 27052718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing https://www.R-project.org Google Scholar
Reumann, S., Babujee, L., Ma, C., Wienkoop, S., Siemsen, T., Antonicelli, G. E., Rasche, N., Lüder, F., Weckwerth, W., & Jahn, O. (2007). Proteome analysis of Arabidopsis leaf peroxisomes reveals novel targeting peptides, metabolic pathways, and defense mechanisms. Plant Cell, 19, 31703193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohn, H., Junker, A., Hartmann, A., Grafahrend-Belau, E., Treutler, H., Klapperstück, M., Czauderna, T., Klukas, C., & Schreiber, F. (2012). VANTED v2: A framework for systems biology applications. BMC Systems Biology, 6, 139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, A. T., Ligterink, W., & Hilhorst, H. W. M. (2017). Metabolite profiling and associated gene expression reveal two metabolic shifts during the seed-to-seedling transition in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Molecular Biology, 95, 481496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skoog, E., Shin, J. H., Saez-Jimenez, V., Mapelli, V., & Olsson, L. (2018). Biobased adipic acid - The challenge of developing the production host. Biotechnology Advances, 36, 22482263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spiess, G. M., Hausman, A., Yu, P., Cohen, J. D., Rampey, R. A., & Zolman, B. K. (2014). Auxin input pathway disruptions are mitigated by changes in auxin biosynthetic gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 165, 10921104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strader, L. C., Culler, A. H., Cohen, J. D., & Bartel, B. (2010). Conversion of endogenous indole-3-butyric acid to indole-3-acetic acid drives cell expansion in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiology, 153, 15771586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strader, L. C., Wheeler, D. L., Christensen, S. E., Berens, J. C., Cohen, J. D., Rampey, R. A., & Bartel, B. (2011). Multiple facets of Arabidopsis seedling development require indole-3-butyric acid-derived auxin. Plant Cell, 23, 984999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabeta, H., Watanabe, S., Fukuda, K., Gunji, S., Asaoka, M., Hirai, M. Y., Seo, M., Tsukaya, H., & Ferjani, A. (2021). An auxin signaling network translates low-sugar-state input into compensated cell enlargement in the fugu5 cotyledon. PLoS Genetics, 17, e1009674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, K., Morimoto, R., Tabeta, H., Asaoka, M., Ishida, M., Maeshima, M., Tsukaya, H., & Ferjani, A. (2017). Compensated cell enlargement in fugu5 is specifically triggered by lowered sucrose production from seed storage lipids. Plant & Cell Physiology, 58, 668678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tjellstrom, H., Andersson, M. X., Larsson, K. E., & Sandelius, A. S. (2008). Membrane phospholipids as a phosphate reserve: The dynamic nature of phospholipid-to-digalactosyl diacylglycerol exchange in higher plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 31, 13881398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsugawa, H., Arita, M., Kanazawa, M., Ogiwara, A., Bamba, T., & Fukusaki, E. (2013). MRMPROBS: A data assessment and metabolite identification tool for large-scale multiple reaction monitoring based widely targeted metabolomics. Analytical Chemistry, 85, 51915199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsugawa, H., Kanazawa, M., Ogiwara, A., & Arita, M. (2014a). MRMPROBS suite for metabolomics using large-scale MRM assays. Bioinformatics, 30, 23792380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsugawa, H., Ohta, E., Izumi, Y., Ogiwara, A., Yukihira, D., Bamba, T., Fukusaki, E., & Arita, M. (2014b). MRM-DIFF: Data processing strategy for differential analysis in large scale MRM-based lipidomics studies. Frontiers in Genetics, 5, 471.Google Scholar
Tsukaya, H. (2002). Interpretation of mutants in leaf morphology: Genetic evidence for a compensatory system in leaf morphogenesis that provides a new link between cell and organismal theories. International Review of Cytology, 217, 139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsukaya, H. (2008). Controlling size in multicellular organs: Focus on the leaf. PLoS Biology, 6, e174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zolman, B. K., Martinez, N., Millius, A., Adham, A. R., & Bartel, B. (2008). Identification and characterization of Arabidopsis indole-3-butyric acid response mutants defective in novel peroxisomal enzymes. Genetics, 180, 237251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zolman, B. K., Nyberg, M., & Bartel, B. (2007). IBR3, a novel peroxisomal acyl-CoA dehydrogenase-like protein required for indole-3-butyric acid response. Plant Molecular Biology, 64, 5972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Metabolic changes in TAG-to-Suc conversion in ibr mutants. (a) Principal component analysis plot for ibr mutants. Metabolome analysis was performed by GC-QqQ-MS using etiolated seedlings at 3 DAI. All 108 metabolites detected by GC-QqQ-MS were used in the PCA (n = 6). PC1–PC4 are described. (b) Hierarchical clustering analysis of each genotype. Data are Z-scores of the average content relative to that of the quality control samples (n = 6) at 3 DAI. (c) Venn diagrams for each mutant line. Each number represents the metabolites with a significantly changed content compared with the WT, as determined by Student’s t-test (n = 6, p < 0.05). Factors shown in the black box are significantly different in all mutants compared with the WT. DAI, days after induction of seed germination.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. GC-MS/MS metabolome analysis in ibr10 mutants. (a) Hierarchical clustering analysis of ibr10-1 and ibr10-2. All 146 metabolites detected by GC-QqQ-MS were categorised into seven clusters (C1–C7) based on behaviour. Data are Z-scores of the average content relative to that of the quality control samples (n = 6) of 3 DAI etiolated seedlings. (b) Pathway analysis in the ibr10 mutants. Primary metabolites related to TAG-to-Suc conversion are plotted on the corresponding metabolic pathway. Data are means + standard deviation (SD) (n = 6) of 3 DAI etiolated seedlings. (c) Volcano plot for ibr10-1. p-values determined by Student’s t-test for WT and ibr10-1 comparisons. Fold change (FC) values were determined for ibr10-1 relative to the WT. Red dots represent metabolites significantly changed between the WT and ibr10-1 (n = 6). DAI, days after induction of seed germination.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. LC-qTOF-MS lipidomic analysis in ibr10 mutants. (a) PCA plot for the ibr mutants. Lipidomic analysis was performed by LC-qTOF-MS non-target analysis using dry seeds (n = 3) and etiolated seedlings (n = 6) at 3 DAI. Each PCA represents a positive and negative mode of liquid chromatography condition. In total, 156 and 161 metabolites were detected in the positive and negative modes, respectively. (b) Volcano plot for ibr10-1. p-values were calculated by Student’s t-test for WT and ibr10-1 comparisons. Fold change (FC) values were determined for ibr10-1 relative to the WT. Red dots represent metabolites significantly changed between the WT and ibr10-1 (n = 6). DAI, days after induction of seed germination.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Analysis of etioplast lipid composition and structure. (a) MGDG and DGDG contents of ibr10 etiolated seedlings. Saturated lipid species were selected from lipidomic data and normalised to WT content. Data are means + SD (n = 6; 3 DAI etiolated seedlings). Asterisks indicate mutants with significant differences compared with the WT (Dunnett’s test at p < 0.05; R ver. 3.5.1). (b) Time-course changes in the SPAD values of ibr10. SPAD values were measured at each time point after light treatment (n = 5; biological replicates). Lower and upper boxes represent the first and third quartiles, and the line in the boxes represents the median. Each single biological replicate contains 10 technical replicates of 3 DAI etiolated seedlings. (c) FE-SEM images of ibr10 etiolated seedlings. Upper images represent cell structure, and the corresponding bottom images represent the prolamellar body in etioplasts of 3 DAI etiolate seedlings. Black bar = 20 $\unicode{x3bc} $m and white bar = 0.5 $\unicode{x3bc} $m. DAI, days after induction of seed germination; SPAD, soil and plant analysis development.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Key metabolites with contents correlated with hypocotyl length. (a) Phenotypes of etiolated seedlings grown on Suc-free MS medium. Photographs were taken at 3 DAI (left panel, bar = 3 mm). The bar plot presents the means + SD of 3 DAI etiolated seedlings (n = 20). Asterisks indicate mutants with significant differences compared with the WT (Dunnett’s test at p < 0.05; R ver. 3.5.1). (b) PCA plot of Class II compensation mutants. Overall, 163 metabolites were detected by GC-QqQ-MS and analysed. Each plot represents samples (n = 4) from 3 DAI etiolated seedlings. (c) BL-SOM analysis of etiolated seedlings. All metabolites were categorised into 70 clusters based the elongation pattern of each mutant. Each box contains metabolites with similar patterns. Blue and red represent low and high amounts compared with the average values, respectively. (d) Bar graph of factors categorised in the cluster (6,6). Data indicate relative contents in each mutant line. (e) Beanplot of etiolated seedling length. Red bars represent means. Blue blocks represent MS medium data, and green blocks represent MS + 10 $\unicode{x3bc} $M Thr data of 3 DAI etiolated seedlings (n = 20). Etiolated seedlings were significantly longer on MS + 10 $\unicode{x3bc} $M Thr compared to Thr-free MS medium in all indicated genotypes, except the pck1-2 mutant (Student’s t-test at p < 0.05). DAI, days after induction of seed germination.

Supplementary material: File

Tabeta et al. supplementary material

Tabeta et al. supplementary material

Download Tabeta et al. supplementary material(File)
File 6.1 MB

Author comment: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R0/PR1

Comments

July 2, 2022

Editor-in-Chief,

Dear Prof. Olivier Hamant,

Please consider our manuscript entitled “Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation” for publication, as an Original Research Article, in Quantitative Plant Biology.

Plant Seedlings kept in darkness adopt a skotomorphogenic developmental program, in which allocation of resources is typically directed toward hypocotyl elongation at the expense of cotyledon and root development. Energy production from seed nutrient reserves is crucial for transition of a plant seedling from a heterotrophic to autotrophic regime. In Arabidopsis thaliana, sucrose (Suc) is synthesized from the triacylglycerol (TAG) of the oil bodies via a sequence of metabolic reactions including core β-oxidation, glyoxylate and TCA cycles, and cytosolic gluconeogenesis, and Suc is used to replenish energy supply during seedling development.

To date, the short hypocotyl phenotype has been ascribed to lowered Suc production during seed germination. While mutants with defects in TAG-to-Suc conversion display short hypocotyls due to limited Suc availability, we previously reported that hypocotyl elongation of indole-3-butyric acid response 10 (ibr10) etiolated seedlings was unaffected despite a 40% reduction in Suc content compared with the wild type (Tabeta et al., 2021 PLOS Genetics). This counter-intuitive phenotype suggests that the length of hypocotyls does not necessarily reflect endogenous Suc content, hinting to the presence of other compounds involved in the regulation of this complex trait. This study, in which a multi-platform metabolome analysis combined with bioinformatics approaches was adopted to unveil the function of IBR10, attempts to tackle this long-standing debate.

Here, to dissect the metabolic complexity behind cell elongation, a quantitative-based phenotypic analysis combined with a multi-platform metabolomics approach was applied. We revealed that TAG and diacylglycerol breakdown was disrupted in the ibr10 mutant, resulting in low sugar content and poor photosynthetic ability. Importantly, batch-learning self-organized map clustering revealed that the endogenous threonine level was correlated with hypocotyl length. Consistently, exogenous threonine supply stimulated hypocotyl elongation, indicating that Suc levels are not always correlated with etiolated seedling length, suggesting the contribution of amino acids in this developmental process.

As you may have appreciated, this study reveals a new role of the amino acid threonine in cell elongation, allowing for the first time the uncoupling of certain etiolated mechanisms using a quantitative metabolic approach. Finally, our findings demonstrate the importance of quantitative plant biology approaches in depicting and visualizing the unseen side(s) of plant development and provide meaningful insight into uncharacterized regulatory mechanisms.

This manuscript is the result of a collaboration between several research groups. Dr. Masami Hirai is an expert in plant metabolomics. Dr. Yozo Okazaki is an expert in plant lipidomics, and Dr. Kiminori Toyooka is an expert of electron microscopy.

We believe that our findings will interest a range of scientists who are interested in developmental biology, metabolomics and the related fields of cell biology.

The submitted version has been approved by all authors. This manuscript has not been submitted to another journal, and none of the results have been published elsewhere. The manuscript has been proofread by two native English speakers.

We believe that our manuscript reports findings of key importance about the metabolic complexity behind cell elongation during Skotomorphogenesis from interdisciplinary and quantitative angles. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require any additional information.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Ali FERJANI

Ph. D (Associate Professor)

Tokyo Gakugei University

Review: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none Dear Editor, My recommendation about the manuscript is Minor Revision. I approve that their approach using multi-omiscs analyses will become more important in the fugure. Their results in this manuscript looks sound. In this manuscript, the autors cocluded that threoine is invloved in regulation of skotomorphogenesis. I agree with this conclusion, but it would be good to have a little more discussion on this point. Therefore, I feel that the present data and description in the text should be improved to make their claims clearer. The reviewer,.

Comments

Comments to Author: This manuscript by Tabeta et al. reports that sucrose level s are not always correlated with etiolated seedling development, and that one of amino acids, threonine, contributes hypocotyl elongation after post germination. To derive the above results, the authors performed multi-omics analyses including metablomics and lipidomics, and electron microscopic observation using Arabidopsis ibr10 mutants. Their results looks sound and confirmatory, and the reviewer thinks the information in this manuscript contribues to the understanding of skotomorphogenesis. However, the current manuscript should be reviesed to make the data more solid. Below are some of the comments, which should be considered to improve the manuscript.

The reviewer agrees with the usefulness of the multi-omics approach performed taken by the authors, and believe that it will be one of the important approaches in the future life science research.

Specific comments

(1) The first and second paragraphs in Result section (lines 100-111) should be moved to Introduction or Discussion section.

(2) Discussion section is too much of a duplication of Introduction and Results sections. The description should be more considered.

(3) The authors used Arabidopsis ibr mutants, especially ibr10, as plant materials. However, as written in Discussion section, IBR10 is revealed to play a lesser role in beta-oxidation process. There, the reviewer feels that the relationship with IBR10 and energy production via beta-oxidation in peroxisomes is obscure. Can the authors provide any further comments about this point?

(4) Multi-omics analyses revealed that threonine is also involved in regulation of hypocotyl elongation. In fact, the addition of exogeneous threonine has been shown to extend the hypocotyls (Figure 5E). The authors should add the data using other amino acids to Figure 5E to demonstrate the specificity of threonine.

(5) Regarding the above comment, can the authors should add more information why threonine is involved in hypocotyl elongation? This is the crucial point, which is related to this paper.

(6) The authors should add the information for growth condition in Figure legend for Figure 5A. Does the medium contain sucrose? If this experiment was performed using the medium without sucrose, a picture of the seedlings under normal growth condition using the medium containing sucrose should be added as a control.

(7) The authors discussed the contribution of protein storage proteins for generation of energy in seedling establishment process in Discussion section (lines 309-314). Why not include data from proteome analysis in wild type and ibr10 mutants? In addition, can the author add the data to show the morphology and numbers of protein bodies using FE-SEM observation in Figure 4C?

(8) In Methods section, the description of centrifugation conditions, such g to rpm, is mixed and should be unified.

Minor comments

(9) Abbreviations of journal names in some references (Autran et al., Hirai et al. (2014) etc) are not uniformly written.

(10) The word of ‘beta’ in some references was depicted in symbol.

(11) The initial letters of all words in titles of some references (Katano et al, Kawade et al. etc) are capitalized.

(12) Replace ‘H. Tabata’ to ‘H.T.’ in Author contribution section.

Review: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to Author: Tabeta et al. previously reported an interesting feature of an Arabidopsis ibr10 mutant, i.e. unaffected hypocotyl elongation of etiolated seedlings despite defects in mobilization of storage lipids into sucrose (Tabeta et al. 2021. PLOS Genet 17: e1009674). This manuscript describes their follow-up work to account for this phenomenon by using a quantitative metabolomics approach. It was shown that ibr10 mutants exhibited lower levels of sugars and organic acids but higher levels of diacylglycerols, triacylglycerols and membrane lipids. Also, the accumulation of adipic acid is indicative of impaired beta-oxidation. Their work has two breakthrough discoveries: (1) Hypocotyl length of etiolated seedlings is not correlated with sucrose content, challenging such a belief held for decades; (2) Instead, the hypocotyl length is correlated with content of the amino acid threonine (Thr), which boosted hypocotyl elongation upon exogenous application. The authors believe that this work exemplifies the importance of quantitative approaches in discovering unseen sides of plant development/uncharacterized regulatory mechanisms. This approach appears to be appropriate as the first attempt to address their research questions. However, it would be better if the conclusions are supported by other data, not solely based on the metabolic profiles.

Specific comments:

1) The accumulation of triacylglycerols in ibr10 seedlings seems to support the finding that beta-oxidation is impaired to supply sucrose. However, non-storage lipids (e.g. diacylglycerol, membrane lipids) are also upregulated. Whether the accumulation of lipids truly reflects a defect in mobilization of storage lipids depends on an important control, i.e. lipid content of mature seeds. Although there is one statement stating that the lipid profiles of dry seeds of WT vs ibr10 were identical (Line 173-174), did the authors observe from their electron micrographs (Fig. 4C) that there is no difference in oil body content of mature WT vs mutant seeds while oil bodies gradually disappear during the course of seed imbibition in WT but not in mutant? Similarly, was the change in MGDG and DGDG correlated with the amount of plastids? The method of lipidomic analysis is provided for mature seeds (section 4.4). Was the same method used for lipid extraction from seedlings? It is important to confirm that the altered lipid profiles of mutant seedlings but no difference in mature mutant seeds were not due to the different lipid extraction methods.

2) This study demonstrated that the breakdown of storage lipids in Arabidopsis (an oilseed species) is not required to supply the energy for hypocotyl elongation. It remains unanswered regarding the source of energy to support heterotrophic growth. No data are provided to support that seed storage proteins are the alternative source in ibr10 mutant.

3) Figure 5D is the only data to challenge the belief that sucrose content is correlated with hypocotyl length. Despite the importance of such data, only one allele (ibr10-1) was used whereas most of other data in this manuscript included two different alleles (ibr10-1 and ibr10-2).

Other comments:

Line 362, “quantitative metabolic approach” should be “quantitative metabolomic approach”.

Recommendation: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R0/PR4

Comments

Comments to Author: Dear Dr. Ferjani

Thank you for submitting to QPB. We have now received reports from two reviewers. On the basis of their comments, we have decided to invite an additional revision of your work.

Below is my understanding of this study:

Elongation of hypocotyl of etiolated seedlings requires both carbon and energy sources and mobilization of TAG in seeds can serve both purposes (carbon and energy). Class II compensation, by reducing cell numbers with cell size increase, can reduce the consumption of carbon and energy required the hypocotyl elongation. In this study, the authors compared the metabolic changes of ibr10 mutant (with Class II compensation) with that of ibr1 and ibr3 mutants (no Class II compensation) (Fig. 1). The authors further showed that mobilization of TAG into sucrose is hampered in the ibr10 mutant. By carrying out BL-SOM analysis, the authors identified that Thr content correlates with hypocotyl length and showed that addition of exogenous Thr can promoter hypocotyl of all lines including WT (Fig. 5A). Then the authors suggested that Thr is a potential regulator of hypocotyl elongation (line 316). Based on the normal hypocotyl phenotype of ibr10 mutant, the authors also pointed out that Suc levels are not always correlated with etiolated seedling length (abstract).

As pointed out by the reviewers, a clearly picture of the roles of sucrose and Thr in hypocotyl elongation and the role of IBR10 should be further discussed and supported by additional data or literature. In addition to the referee reports, I have some further questions on the findings of this study.

1. What are the levels of sucrose and Thr (and other amino acids) in ibr1 and ibr3 mutants? Can the author provide a table to compare the levels of these metabolites (sugar, amino acids, with statistics) in all 3 ibr1/3/10 mutants with that of WT?

2. Is the ability of TAG mobilization different between the ibr1/3/10 mutants? These two questions important because the lower sucrose level in ibr10 mutant can be due to both 1. Lower supply of sucrose from TAG degradation, AND 2. Higher efficiency in consuming sucrose in ibr10 mutant for hypocotyl elongation, AND 3. Different strategy in resource allocation (see point 3 below).

3. Are the chlorophyll contents (SPAD values) different between WT and ibr1/3/10 mutants? It is also possible that ibr10 mutant can generate longer hypocotyl than the other mutants because it diverts its energy from chlorophyll synthesis and chloroplast biogenesis to hypocotyl elongation. TEM photos (Like Fig. 4C), if available, can also be provided.

4. As pointed out by one reviewer, why threonine is involved in hypocotyl elongation? Can Thr act as an alternative energy source or carbon source for hypocotyl elongation? Please discuss.

5. As pointed out by one reviewer, other amino acids should be tested as controls to see if Thr is unique or the same effects can be achieved by some other amino acids. At least this should be done on WT. Seedling photos and bar chart with statistics should be provided. In Fig. 5E, are the differences (+/- Thr) statistically significant? Quantitative analyses are important for QPB articles.

I hope you agree that answering the questions above and in the referees’ reports can help you to further clarify the importance of Thr and sucrose in hypocotyl elongation and why ibr10 mutant is so different from ibr1/3 mutants. Please kindly provide a letter with point-by-point responses to our comments/questions in your revised manuscript.

Yours sincerely

Boon Leong LIM

Associate Editor

Decision: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R1/PR6

Comments

September 1, 2022

Editor-in-Chief,

Dear Prof. Olivier Hamant,

We would like to thank you very much and the two reviewers for your highly positive evaluation of our manuscript QPB-22-0013 entitled "Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation" that you have found very interesting, and will be considered appropriate for publication in Quantitative Plant Biology if we return an acceptably revised version that is responsive to your and the reviewers comments and suggestions.

The manuscript has been revised extensively and carefully according to your advices and the comments of the Associate Editor, and the reviewers. First, we are pleased to inform you that all major areas of concern as mentioned by the Associate Editor, reviewers 1 and 2 have been properly addressed either by providing additional experimental data, or through appropriate additions and modifications to the manuscript text.

More specifically, we measured again the SPAD values in all genotypes (Col-0, ibr1, ibr3, and both ibr10 alleles), provided a new data set of the effect of exogenous supply of amino acids other than threonine (Gly, Ser, Cys, Lys, Glu, Asp, and Phe), and another data set showing the hypocotyls of all genotypes shown in Figure 5a, but this time in the presence of sucrose. All these new data sets were integrated into the revised MS as Figure 4b, Supplementary Figures S4 and S7. Despite the large amount of new data and their related description in Figures, the results and discussion, the final manuscript size did not significantly change. Therefore, we believe that we have properly generated a well-condensed version that properly addresses the reviewer’s concerns.

Here below, please find our point-by-point responses to the specific and minor comments raised by the Associate Editor, and both reviewers. As you may have appreciated, we could reach a substantially well-revised version of the manuscript that is fully responsive to your concerns and criticisms. We believe that the revised manuscript will satisfy you, the Associate Editor and the reviewers and that is much better suited for publication in QPB.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Ali FERJANI

Ph. D (Associate Professor)

Tokyo Gakugei University

Review: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R1/PR7

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to Author: The method of lipidomic analysis for etiolated seedlings is still missing in the revised manuscript.

Recommendation: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R1/PR8

Comments

Comments to Author: Dear Authors

Thank you for resubmitting your revised manuscript to QPB. The revised version has added additional experimentment data and most of the reviewers’ comments were answered.

As shown in the Supplementary Fig. S7, addition of Thr, but not of Gly, Ser, Cys, Lys, Glu, Asp, and Phe did not enhance the growth of etiolated seedlings. You also cited that’. As Ala, Cys, Gly, Trp, and Thr from protein reserves represent a major source of pyruvate (Eastmond et al., 2015)” (Line 367). Then, you suggested that “our data indicate that Thr can act both as an alternative energy source and a carbon source during hypocotyl elongation.” (Line 370). However, your data showed that Cys and Gly did not enhance hypocotyl elongation like Thr did. Hence, the statement in line 370 is ambiguous. There are also other possibilities. For example, Thr, rather than the a.a. you tested, can also be used for succinyl-CoA production. In the author response you wrote “Yet, at the moment we do not know the reason behind this difference among the assayed amino acids.”. Perhaps you should admit that further studies are required for finding the mechanism.

Minor points:

1. The method of lipidomic analysis for etiolated seedlings is still missing in the revised manuscript.

2. In page. 25, Supplemental Figure 6 is missing. Sometimes Figure x was used, and sometimes Figure Sx was used. Please amend.

Yours sincerely

Boon Leong Lim

Decision: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R2/PR10

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R2/PR11

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to Author: It was pointed out in the last revision that the method of lipidomic analysis has been provided for mature seeds but not etiolated seedlings. Here, the authors have revised it to declare that the same method was applied to both tissue types. I have one last concern about the amount of specimens for analysis as Line 436 now states that approximately 0.8 mg of mature seeds or etiolated seedlings were used. However, it is suspected that one seedling already weighs >0.8 mg. It is more logical to expect that more seedlings were pooled to minimize variations in this experiment. May I ask the authors to double check before this manuscript is sent for production after acceptance? Thank you!

Recommendation: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R2/PR12

Comments

Comments to Author: Dear Authors

Here is the comment from a reviewer. Please double check the seed weight and amend it if necessary.

“It was pointed out in the last revision that the method of lipidomic analysis has been provided for mature seeds but not etiolated seedlings. Here, the authors have revised it to declare that the same method was applied to both tissue types. I have one last concern about the amount of specimens for analysis as Line 436 now states that approximately 0.8 mg of mature seeds or etiolated seedlings were used. However, it is suspected that one seedling already weighs >0.8 mg. It is more logical to expect that more seedlings were pooled to minimize variations in this experiment. May I ask the authors to double check before this manuscript is sent for production after acceptance?”

Thank you!

Yours sincerely

Boon Leong LIM

https://boon-leong-lim-lab.webflow.io/

Decision: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R2/PR13

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R3/PR14

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Recommendation: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R3/PR15

Comments

Comments to Author: Dear Authors

We are pleased to accept your manuscript.

Regards

Boon Leong Lim

Decision: Skotomorphogenesis exploits threonine to promote hypocotyl elongation — R3/PR16

Comments

No accompanying comment.