Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:06:42.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Metallicity Distribution of Distant F and G Type Stars in the CFHT Legacy Survey Deep Field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Yüksel Karataş*
Affiliation:
Istanbul University, Science Faculty, Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, 34119, Istanbul, Türkiye
Mukremin Kilic
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Orhan Güneş
Affiliation:
Istanbul University, Science Faculty, Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, 34119, Istanbul, Türkiye
Füsun Limboz
Affiliation:
Istanbul University, Science Faculty, Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, 34119, Istanbul, Türkiye
*
CCorresponding author. Email: karatas@istanbul.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We study the metal abundances of F and G type stars in the Galactic disk and halo using the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey D4 field. For a sample of stars within 7 kpc of the Galactic plane, we derive mean abundance values of [Fe/H] = −0.77 ± 0.36 dex for the thick disk, and [Fe/H] = –1.42 ± 0.98 dex for the stellar halo, respectively. These metallicites are consistent with the metallicity estimates from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 6. We do not find a vertical abundance gradient for the thick disk between 1 kpc and 4 kpc. However, stars within 1 kpc of the Galactic plane are saturated in our dataset, and therefore we cannot rule out the observed vertical metallicity gradient for the thick disk stars in the SDSS. Moreover, we find a negative trend in the halo metallicity with increasing distance from the Galactic plane. This trend could be due to a contribution from an increasing number of very metal poor stars that belong to the outer halo. However, systematic effects in photometric metallicities are largest for the most metal poor stars, and therefore these effects cannot be ruled out.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2009

References

Allende Prieto, C., Beers, T. C., Wilhelm, R., Newberg, H. J., Rockosi, C. M., Yanny, B. & Lee, Y. S., 2006, ApJ, 636, 804 Google Scholar
Carney, B., Latham, D. W. & Laird, J. B., 1989, ApJ, 97, 423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, B., Laird, J. B., Latham, D. W. & Aguilar, L. A., 1996, AJ, 112, 668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carollo, D. et al., 2007, Nature, 450, 1020 Google Scholar
Clem, J., VandenBerg, D. A. & Stetson, P., 2008, AJ, 135, 682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, G. & Wyse, R. F. G., 1985, AJ, 90, 2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmi, A. et al., 2003, ApJ, 586, 195 Google Scholar
Ivezic, Z. et al., 2008, ApJ, 684, 287 Google Scholar
Le Fevre, O. et al., 2005, A&A, 439, 845 Google Scholar
Limboz, F., Karatas, Y., Kilic, M., Benoist, C. & Alis, S., 2008, MNRAS, 383, 957 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, S. G. & Norris, J.E., 1991, AJ, 101, 1865 Google Scholar
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P. & Davis, M., 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 Google Scholar
Schultheis, M., Robin, A., Reyle, C., McCracken, H. J., Bertin, E., Mellier, Y. & Le Fevre, O., 2006, A&A, 447, 185 Google Scholar
Pickles, A. J., 1998, PASP, 110, 863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, D. L. et al., 2006, AN, 327, 821 Google Scholar
Sandage, A., 1969, ApJ, 158, 1115 Google Scholar
Wallerstein, G., 1962, ApJS, 6, 407 Google Scholar