Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:44:57.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The h-index in Australian Astronomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2013

Kevin A. Pimbblet
Affiliation:
School of Physics, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia. Email: kevin.pimbblet@monash.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Hirsch h-index is now widely used as a metric to compare individual researchers. To evaluate it in the context of Australian astronomy, the h-index for every member of the Astronomical Society of Australia (ASA) is found using NASA's Astrophysics Data System Bibliographic Services. Percentiles of the h-index distribution are detailed for a variety of categories of ASA members, including students. This enables a list of the top ten Australian researchers by h-index to be produced. These top researchers have h-index values in the range 53<h<77, which is less than that recently reported for the American Astronomical Society membership. We suggest that membership of extremely large consortia such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey may partially explain the difference. We further suggest that many student ASA members with large h-index values have probably already received their Ph.D. and need to upgrade their ASA membership status. To attempt to specify the h-index distribution relative to opportunity, we also detail the percentiles of its distribution by years since Ph.D. award date. This shows a steady increase in h-index with seniority, as can be expected.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2011

References

Abazajian, K. N. et al. , 2009, ApJS, 182, 543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon., 2005, Science, 309, 1181Google Scholar
Ball, P., 2005, Nature, 436, 900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blustin, A., 2007, A&G, 48, 6.32Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R. & Daniel, H.-D., 2008, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 59, 830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colless, M. et al. , 2001, MNRAS, 328, 1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, A., Lowe, S., Accomazzi, A. & DiMilia, G., 2011, AAS, 217, #145.01 (see http://dl.dropbox.com/u/473509/Astro-HR.pdf)Google Scholar
Drinkwater, M. J. et al. , 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egghe, L., 2006, Scientometr., 69, 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, J. E., 2005, PNAS, 102, 16569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, J. E., 2007, PNAS, 104, 19193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, B., 2006, Sci. Focus, 1, 8Google Scholar
Jin, B., Liang, L., Rousseau, R. & Egghe, L., 2007, Chin. Sci. Bull., 52, 855Google Scholar
Kosmulski, M., 2006, ISSIN, 2, 4Google Scholar
Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S., Demleitner, M., Murray, S. S., Martimbeau, N. & Elwell, B., 2005, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 56, 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, F., 2004, A&G, 45, 2.15Google Scholar
Pimbblet, K. A., 2011, MNRAS, 411, 2637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Q., 2010, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 61, 609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zyczkowski, K., 2010, Scientometr., 85, 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar