Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:39:13.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case management to improve major depression in primary health care: a systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2005

J. GENSICHEN
Affiliation:
Institute for General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt/M, Germany
M. BEYER
Affiliation:
Institute for General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt/M, Germany
C. MUTH
Affiliation:
Institute for General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt/M, Germany
F. M. GERLACH
Affiliation:
Institute for General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt/M, Germany
M. VON KORFF
Affiliation:
Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, USA
J. ORMEL
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background. Deficits in the care of depression lead to poor medication adherence, which increases the risk of an unfavourable outcome for this care. This review evaluates effects on symptoms and medication adherence of case management in primary health care.

Method. A systematic literature search was performed. The quality of the studies was rated according to the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group (EPOC) criteria. To conduct a subgroup analysis interventions were classified as either ‘standard’ or ‘complex’ case management.

Results. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. In a meta-analysis we calculated a standard mean difference/effect size on symptom severity after 6–12 months of −0·40 (95% CI −0·60 to –0·20). Patients in the intervention groups were more likely to achieve remission after 6–12 months [relative risk (RR) 1·39, 95% CI 1·30–1·48]. The relative risk for clinical response was 1·82 (95% CI 1·68–2·05). Patients in intervention groups had better medication adherence than the control group (RR 1·5, 95% CI 1·28–1·86). We found heterogeneous results when assessing effects of different types of intervention.

Conclusions. We conclude that case management improves management of major depression in primary health-care settings.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)