No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Letter to the Editor: Critique of Bahorik et al. (2013) – 'Underreporting of drug use among individuals with schizophrenia: prevalence and predictors’ – a reply
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 October 2013
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Correspondence
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
Bahorik, AL, Newhill, CE, Queen, CC, Eack, SM (2013). Under-reporting of drug use among individuals with schizophrenia: prevalence and predictors. Psychological Medicine. Published online
3
04
2013
. doi:10.1017/S0033291713000548.Google ScholarPubMed
Carey, K (2002). Clinically useful assessments: substance use and comorbid psychiatric disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy
40, 1345–1361.Google Scholar
Donovan, D, Bigelow, G, Brigham, G, Carroll, K, Cohen, A, Gardin, J, Hamilton, J, Huestis, M, Lindbald, R, Marlatt, G, Preston, K, Selzer, J, Somoza, E, Wakim, P, Wells, E (2012). Primary outcome indices in illicit drug dependence treatment research: systematic approach to selection and measurement of drug use end-points in clinical trials. Addiction
107, 694–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McHugo, G, Drake, R, Brunette, M, Essock, S, Green, A (2006). Enhancing validity in co-occurring disorders treatment research. Schizophrenia Bulletin
32, 655–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dorn, R, Desmarais, SL, Swartz, MS, Young, MS, Sellers, BG (2013). Critique of Bahorik et al. (2013) – 'Underreporting of drug use among individuals with schizophrenia: prevalence and predictors’. Psychological Medicine. doi:10.1017/S0033291713002511.Google Scholar
Ziedonis, D, Smelson, D, Rosenthal, R, Batki, S, Green, A, Henry, R, Montoya, I, Parks, J, Weiss, R (2005). Improving the care of individuals with schizophrenia and substance use disorders: consensus recommendations. Journal of Psychiatric Practice
11, 315–339.Google Scholar