Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-b5nxq Total loading time: 0.248 Render date: 2021-05-14T14:55:33.520Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Face processing in adolescents with positive and negative threat bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2016

C. M. Sylvester
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Missouri, USA
S. E. Petersen
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Missouri, USA Department of Psychology, Washington University School of Medicine, Missouri, USA
J. L. Luby
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Missouri, USA
D. M. Barch
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Missouri, USA Department of Psychology, Washington University School of Medicine, Missouri, USA Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Missouri, USA
Corresponding

Abstract

Background

Individuals with anxiety disorders exhibit a ‘vigilance-avoidance’ pattern of attention to threatening stimuli when threatening and neutral stimuli are presented simultaneously, a phenomenon referred to as ‘threat bias’. Modifying threat bias through cognitive retraining during adolescence reduces symptoms of anxiety, and so elucidating neural mechanisms of threat bias during adolescence is of high importance. We explored neural mechanisms by testing whether threat bias in adolescents is associated with generalized or threat-specific differences in the neural processing of faces.

Method

Subjects were categorized into those with (n = 25) and without (n = 27) threat avoidance based on a dot-probe task at average age 12.9 years. Threat avoidance in this cohort has previously been shown to index threat bias. Brain response to individually presented angry and neutral faces was assessed in a separate session using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

Adolescents with threat avoidance exhibited lower activity for both angry and neutral faces relative to controls in several regions in the occipital, parietal, and temporal lobes involved in early visual and facial processing. Results generalized to happy, sad, and fearful faces. Adolescents with a prior history of depression and/or an anxiety disorder had lower activity for all faces in these same regions. A subset of results replicated in an independent dataset.

Conclusions

Threat bias is associated with generalized, rather than threat-specific, differences in the neural processing of faces in adolescents. Findings may aid in the development of novel treatments for anxiety disorders that use attention training to modify threat bias.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Angold, A, Costello, EJ (2000). The Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment (CAPA). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 39, 3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Haim, Y (2010). Research review: attention bias modification (ABM): a novel treatment for anxiety disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 51, 859870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar-Haim, Y, Lamy, D, Pergamin, L, Bakermans-Kranenburg, MJ, van IJzendoorn, MH (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin 133, 124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barch, DM, Gaffrey, MS, Botteron, KN, Belden, AC, Luby, JL (2012). Functional brain activation to emotionally valenced faces in school-aged children with a history of preschool-onset major depression. Biological Psychiatry 72, 10351042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlow, DH (2002). Anxiety and Its Disorders. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
Bird, HR, Gould, MS, Staghezza, B (1992). Aggregating data from multiple informants in child psychiatry epidemiological research. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 31, 7885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Britton, JC, Bar-Haim, Y, Carver, FW, Holroyd, T, Norcross, MA, Detloff, A, Leibenluft, E, Ernst, M, Pine, DS (2012). Isolating neural components of threat bias in pediatric anxiety. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 53, 678686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckner, RL, Head, D, Parker, J, Fotenos, AF, Marcus, D, Morris, JC, Snyder, AZ (2004). A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume. Neuroimage 23, 724738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cisler, JM, Koster, EH (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: an integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review 30, 203216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbetta, M, Shulman, GL (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3, 201215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desimone, R (1998). Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 353, 12451255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desimone, R, Duncan, J (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18, 193222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egger, HL, Ascher, B, Angold, A (2003). The Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment: Version 1.4. Duke University Medical Center: Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Eldar, S, Apter, A, Lotan, D, Edgar, KP, Naim, R, Fox, NA, Pine, DS, Bar-Haim, Y (2012). Attention bias modification treatment for pediatric anxiety disorders: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry 169, 213220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eldar, S, Ricon, T, Bar-Haim, Y (2008). Plasticity in attention: implications for stress response in children. Behaviour Research and Therapy 46, 450461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fani, N, Jovanovic, T, Ely, TD, Bradley, B, Gutman, D, Tone, EB, Ressler, KJ (2012). Neural correlates of attention bias to threat in post-traumatic stress disorder. Biological Psychology 90, 134142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gotlib, IH, Sivers, H, Gabrieli, JD, Whitfield-Gabrieli, S, Goldin, P, Minor, KL, Canli, T (2005). Subgenual anterior cingulate activation to valenced emotional stimuli in major depression. Neuroreport 16, 17311734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, PJ, Colas, JT, Kanwisher, NG (2012). Pre-stimulus pattern of activity in the fusiform face area predicts face percepts during binocular rivalry. Neuropsychologia 50, 522529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joormann, J, Talbot, L, Gotlib, IH (2007). Biased processing of emotional information in girls at risk for depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 116, 135143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanwisher, N, Yovel, G (2006). The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 361, 21092128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kastner, S, Ungerleider, LG (2001). The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex. Neuropsychologia 39, 12631276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, RC, Berglund, P, Demler, O, Jin, R, Merikangas, KR, Walters, EE (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry 62, 593602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, R (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 138147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koster, EH, Baert, S, Bockstaele, M, De Raedt, R (2010). Attentional retraining procedures: manipulating early or late components of attentional bias? Emotion (Washington, DC) 10, 230236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koster, EH, Crombez, G, Verschuere, B, Van Damme, S, Wiersema, JR (2006). Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance. Behaviour Research and Therapy 44, 17571771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koster, EH, Verschuere, B, Crombez, G, Van Damme, S (2005). Time-course of attention for threatening pictures in high and low trait anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy 43, 10871098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luby, JL, Belden, AC, Pautsch, J, Si, X, Spitznagel, E (2009 a). The clinical significance of preschool depression: impairment in functioning and clinical markers of the disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders 112, 111119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luby, JL, Si, X, Belden, AC, Tandon, M, Spitznagel, E (2009 b). Preschool depression: homotypic continuity and course over 24 months. Archives of General Psychiatry 66, 897905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLeod, C, Rutherford, E, Campbell, L, Ebsworthy, G, Holker, L (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 111, 107123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merikangas, KR, He, J-P, Burstein, M, Swanson, SA, Avenevoli, S, Cui, L, Benjet, C, Georgiades, K, Swendsen, J (2010). Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication – Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 49, 980989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mogg, K, Bradley, BP, de Bono, J, Painter, M (1997). Time course of attentional bias for threat information in non-clinical anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy 35, 297303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mogg, K, Bradley, BP, Miles, F, Dixon, R (2004). Time course of attentional bias for threat scenes: testing the vigilance-avoidance hypothesis. Cognition & Emotion 18, 689700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojemann, JG, Akbudak, E, Snyder, AZ, McKinstry, RC, Raichle, ME, Conturo, TE (1997). Anatomic localization and quantitative analysis of gradient refocused echo-planar fMRI susceptibility artifacts. Neuroimage 6, 156167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, RB, Kuckertz, JM, Siegle, GJ, Ladouceur, CD, Silk, JS, Ryan, ND, Dahl, RE, Amir, N (2015). Empirical recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical research. Psychological Assessment 27, 365376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, RB, Rosen, D, Siegle, GJ, Ladouceur, CD, Tang, K, Allen, KB, Ryan, ND, Dahl, RE, Forbes, EE, Silk, JS (2016). From anxious youth to depressed adolescents: prospective prediction of 2-year depression symptoms via attentional bias measures. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 125, 267278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, RB, Siegle, GJ, Silk, JS, Ladouceur, CD, McFarland, A, Dahl, RE, Ryan, ND (2014). Looking under the hood of the dot-probe task: an fMRI study in anxious youth. Depression and Anxiety 31, 178187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shechner, T, Britton, JC, Pérez-Edgar, K, Bar-Haim, Y, Ernst, M, Fox, NA, Leibenluft, E, Pine, DS (2012). Attention biases, anxiety, and development: toward or away from threats or rewards? Depression and Anxiety 29, 282294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shechner, T, Rimon-Chakir, A, Britton, JC, Lotan, D, Apter, A, Bliese, PD, Pine, DS, Bar-Haim, Y (2014). Attention bias modification treatment augmenting effects on cognitive behavioral therapy in children with anxiety: randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 53, 6171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, JS, Power, JD, Dubis, JW, Vogel, AC, Church, JA, Schlaggar, BL, Petersen, SE (2014). Statistical improvements in functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses produced by censoring high-motion data points. Human Brain Mapping 35, 19811996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sylvester, CM, Barch, DM, Corbetta, M, Power, JD, Schlaggar, BL, Luby, JL (2013). Resting state functional connectivity of the ventral attention network in children with a history of depression or anxiety. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 52, 13261336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sylvester, CM, Hudziak, JJ, Gaffrey, MS, Barch, DM, Luby, JL (2016). Stimulus-driven attention, threat bias, and sad bias in youth with a history of an anxiety disorder or depression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 44, 219231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sylvester, CM, Shulman, GL, Jack, AI, Corbetta, M (2007). Asymmetry of anticipatory activity in visual cortex predicts the locus of attention and perception. Journal of Neuroscience 27, 1442414433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talairach, J, Tournoux, P (1988). Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. Thieme Medical: New York.Google Scholar
Teachman, BA, Joormann, J, Steinman, SA, Gotlib, IH (2012). Automaticity in anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder. Clinical Psychology Review 32, 575603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tottenham, N, Tanaka, JW, Leon, AC, McCarry, T, Nurse, M, Hare, TA, Marcus, DJ, Westerlund, A, Casey, BJ, Nelson, C (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research 168, 242249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waechter, S, Nelson, AL, Wright, C, Hyatt, A, Oakman, J (2014). Measuring attentional bias to threat: reliability of dot probe and eye movement indices. Cognitive Therapy and Research 38, 313333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, JMG, Watts, FN, MacLeod, C, Mathews, A (1997). Cognitive Psychology and Emotional Disorders. Wiley: Chichester.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sylvester supplementary material

Supplementary Figure

Download Sylvester supplementary material(File)
File 577 KB

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Face processing in adolescents with positive and negative threat bias
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Face processing in adolescents with positive and negative threat bias
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Face processing in adolescents with positive and negative threat bias
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *