Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-xt4p2 Total loading time: 0.169 Render date: 2022-05-23T10:56:16.604Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Facilities for mentally impaired patients: three years experience of a semi-secure unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Stephen Tyrer
Affiliation:
Prudhoe Hospital, Prudhoe, Northumberland NE42 5NT
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Extract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Working Party on Security in NHS Hospitals (The Glancy Report, DHSS, 1974a) and the interim report of The Butler Committee (DHSS, 1974b) both recommended that secure provision should be made available for the treatment of mentally disordered patients who required greater security than could be provided in a standard hospital setting. They recommended that patients with mild or borderline mental handicap should be treated together with the mentally ill but that “severely subnormal patients” should be treated separately. Later the Royal College of Psychiatrists (1981) largely endorsed this advice proposing that:

  1. (a) individuals with borderline and mild mental handicap could be adequately treated in the secure units for mentally ill individuals

  2. (b) individuals with moderate mental handicap needed a special secure facility

  3. (c) individuals with severe mental handicap did not need high security, and should be managed in high-staffed wards in mental handicap hospitals.

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1990

References

Department of Health and Social Security (1974a) Security in NHS Hospitals for the Mentally Ill and the Mentally Handicapped (Glancy Report). London: DHSS.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1974b) The Interim Report of the Committee on Mentally Abnormal Offenders (Butler Report) Cmnd 5698. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Grounds, A. T. (1987) Detention of psychopathic disorder patients in Special Hospitals: Critical issues. British Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 474478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, G., Holland, A. & Fowler, P. (in press). MIETS: A service option for people with mild learning disability and challenging behaviour or psychiatric problems. Mental Handicap Research. Google Scholar
Oxford Regional Health Authority (1976) A Survey of the Need for Secure Psychiatric Facilities in the Oxford Region. Oxford: Oxford Regional Health Authority.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (1981) Secure Facilities for Psychiatric Patients - A Comprehensive Policy. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
You have Access
Open access
8
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Facilities for mentally impaired patients: three years experience of a semi-secure unit
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Facilities for mentally impaired patients: three years experience of a semi-secure unit
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Facilities for mentally impaired patients: three years experience of a semi-secure unit
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *