Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:36:52.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Who Runs for Congress?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Linda L. Fowler*
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College

Extract

The United States has more elections than any other democracy. Voters not only fill positions that are typically appointive in other countries, such as judges, but they also select officials for many more layers of government, from the town or county to the federal level. Voters even select nominees for the ballot through primaries, instead of relying on party organizations to designate candidates. With the briefest intervals separating the close of one election cycle in November and the onset of another in February or March, Americans are never far from some candidate's plea: “Vote for me.”

Among the thousands of candidates who compete for elected office each year, those who run for Congress occupy a special place. The Congress is the crossroads of local and national politics, where representatives of state and district interests forge a national consensus on a staggering array of issues. Given this task, it is logical that most members of the House of Representatives and Senate begin their political careers in local and state government. In the House, for example, more than fifty percent of the members use the state legislature as a stepping stone to Capitol Hill. The House, in turn, serves as a proving ground for many who aspire to the Senate or a governorship, while the Senate fosters the ambitions of numerous presidential candidates. Thus, the Congress provides a useful vantage point for examining the experiences and goals of the men and women who become candidates in the United States.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auden, W. H., and Kronenberger, Louis. [1962] 1981. Viking Book of Aphorisms: A Personal Selection. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, David T. 1990. Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts: Political Amateurs in the United States Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenhalt, Alan. 1991. The United States of Ambition: Politicians, Power, and the Pursuit of Office. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Fowler, Linda L. 1993. Candidates, Congress, and the American Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Linda L., and McClure, Robert D. 1989. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kazee, Thomas A., ed. 1994. Who Runs for Congress: Ambition, Context, and Candidate Emergence. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Krasno, Jonathan S. 1994. Challengers, Competition, and Reelection: Comparing Senate and House Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E., and Malbin, Michael J. 1996. Vital Statistics on Congress, 1995–96. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Roll Call. 1996. 22 January: 1.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Swain, Carol M. 1996. “African Americans and Women in Congress: Recruitment Patterns and Background Characteristics, 1870–1996,” in Congress Reconsidered, 6th ed., Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Westlye, Mark C. 1991. Senate Elections & Campaign Intensity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar