Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:26:13.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where the Rubber Meets the Road: Aligning IRBs and Research Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2008

Felice J. Levine  and
Paula R. Skedsvold
Felice J. Levine
Affiliation:
American Educational Research Association
Paula R. Skedsvold
Affiliation:
American Educational Research Association
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years, there has been increased discussion and even debate about how to reconcile a commitment to the ethical conduct of research in the social and behavioral sciences with a regulatory apparatus for the protection of human subjects that seems too often to fall short of its own aspirations and ideals. The gap between regulations and their implementation whether at the federal, state, or local levels is typically grist for the mill in political science. When, however, the issues are more in our own backyard—in our academic and research institutions—insight, interventions, and even empirical study are harder to come by. The purpose of this essay is neither to applaud what is right nor to decry what is wrong with the current system for the protection of human subjects as practiced. Our goal is to help further catalyze through this PS symposium a conversation about the need to produce system reform, illustrate some readily doable steps for doing so, and entice social science colleagues to work at their own institutions and at a national level for system change.

Type
Symposium—Protecting Human Research Participants, IRBs, and Political Science Redux
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 501 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashcraft, Mark H., and Krause, Jeremy A.. 2007. “Social and Behavioral Researchers' Experiences with their IRBs.” Ethics and Behavior 17 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, James, Whiton, John, and Connelly, Sharon. 1998. Final Report: Evaluation of NIH Implementation of Section 491 of the Public Health Service Act, Mandating a Program of Protection for Research Subjects. The Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health. Arlington, VA: James Bell Associates.Google Scholar
Citro, Connie F., Ilgen, Daniel R., Marrett, Cora B., eds. 2003. Protecting Participants and Facilitating Social and Behavioral Sciences Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Fost, Norman, and Levine, Robert J.. 2007. “The Dysregulation of Human Subjects Research.” Journal of the American Medical Association 298 (18): 2,196–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, Bradford H., Cooke, Robert A., and Tannenbaum, Arnold S.. 1978. “Research Involving Human Subjects.” Science 201 (September): 1,094–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunsalus, C. Kristina, Bruner, Edward, Burbules, Nicholas, Dash, Leon DeCosta Jr., Finkin, Matthew W., Goldberg, Joseph, Greenough, William, Miller, Gregory, and Pratt, Michael G.. 2007. “The Illinois White Paper: Improving the System for Protecting Human Subjects; Counteracting IRB Mission Creep.” Qualitative Inquiry 13 (5): 617–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith-Spiegel, Patricia, and Koocher, Gerald P.. 2005. “The IRB Paradox: Could the Protectors Also Encourage Deceit?” Ethics and Behavior 15 (4): 339–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keith-Spiegel, Patricia, Koocher, Gerald P., and Tabachnick, Barbara G.. 2006. “What Scientists Want from Their Research Ethics Committee.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1 (1): 67–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, Felice J., and Sieber, Joan E.. 2007. “Ethical Issues Related to Linked Social-Spatial Data.” In Putting People on the Map: Protecting Confidentiality with Linked Social-Spatial Data, ed. Gutmann, Myron P. and Stern, Paul C.. Panel on Confidentiality Issues Arising from the Integration of Remotely Sensed and Self-Identifying Data, National Research Council. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Felice J., and Skedsvold, Paula R.. 2008. “Behavioral and Social Science Research.” In The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, ed. Emanuel, Ezekiel J., Grady, Christine, Crouch, Robert A., Lie, Reidar K., Miller, Franklin G., and Wendler, David. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Robert J. 1979. “Changing Federal Regulation of IRBs: The Commission's Recommendations and the FDA's Proposals.” IRB: Ethics and Human Research 1 (1): 1–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Lind, E. Allan, and Tyler, Tom R.. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical, and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2005. Expanding Access to Research Data: Reconciling Risks and Opportunities. Panel on Data Access for Research Purposes, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, John A. 1979. “Ten Ways to Improve IRBs.” The Hastings Center Report 9 (1): 29–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sieber, Joan E. 2004. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Using Our Best Judgment in Conducting Human Research.” Ethics and Behavior 14 (4): 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieber, Joan E., Plattner, Stuart, and Rubin, Philip. 2002. “How (Not) to Regulate Social and Behavioral Research.” Professional Ethics Report XV (2): 1–4.Google Scholar
Singer, Eleanor, and Levine, Felice J.. 2003. “Protection of Human Subjects of Research: Recent Developments and Future Prospects for the Social Sciences.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67 (1): 148–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, John W., and Walker, Laurens. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1988. “What is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures.” Law and Society Review 22 (1): 103–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2004. “Enhancing Police Legitimacy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593 (1): 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., and Lind, E. Allan. 1992. “A Relational Model of Authority in Groups.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25 (July): 115–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar