Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T22:17:54.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reforming the House: Three Moderately Radical Proposals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Arend Lijphart
Arend Lijphart*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most observers of the United States House of Representatives undoubtedly agree that in many respects, large and small, the House does not perform its representative function very well. Not being an expert on the details and intricacies of House operations, I shall leave the smaller matters—such as incremental steps to reform the financing of election campaigns—to the specialists. Let me focus instead on three major characteristics that makes the House insufficiently representative: (1) its election by plurality, which does not provide adequate representation for minorities and minority views; (2) its election by an unrepresentative electorate, especially in midterm elections when only about one-third of the eligible voters make use of their right to vote; and (3) its comparatively small size of only 435 members.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 31 , Issue 1: 30th Anniversary Issue , March 1998 , pp. 10 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biais, André, and Carry, R.K. 1990. “Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout?” European Journal of Political Research 18(2): 167–81.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark. 1995. Electoral Laws and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review 91(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination.” Comparative Political Studies 26(2): 198–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Carey, John M. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, Rein. 1972. “The Size of National Assemblies.” Social Science Research 1(4): 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar