Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:53:46.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Electoral College: A Misunderstood Institution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Danny M. Adkison  and
Christopher Elliott
Danny M. Adkison
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Christopher Elliott
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 77 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1997

References

Arrington, Theodore S. and Brenner, Saul. 1994. “Should the Electoral College be Replaced by Direct Election of the President? A Debate,” PS: Political Science and Politics 17(2)237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barilleaux, Ryan. 1996. American Government in Action: Principle, Process, Politics. 1996. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Berman, Larry, and Murphy, Bruce Allen. 1996. Approaching Democracy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bibby, John F. 1992. Governing by Consent. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc. Google Scholar
Burns, James MacGregor, Cronin, Thomas E., and Magleby, David B.. 1993. Government by the People, 15th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, James, Kessler, Mark, Williams, Bruce A., and Switzer, Jacqueline Vaughn. 1996. The Play of Power: An Introduction to American Government. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Edward S. and Page, Benjamin I.. 1995. The Struggle for Democracy. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.Google Scholar
Harris, Fred and Wasserman, Gary. America's Government. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown Higher Education.Google Scholar
Janda, Kenneth, Berry, Jeffrey M., and Goldman, Jerry. 1995. The Challenge of Democracy: Government in America, 4th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Lasser, William. 1996. American Politics: Institutions and Interconnections. Lexington, MA: DC Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Lineberry, Robert L., Edwards, George C. III, and Wattenberg, Martin P.. 1991. Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy, 5th ed. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. and Ginsberg, Benjamin. 1996. American Government: Freedom and Power. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
McKenna, George. 1994. The Drama of Democracy: American Government and Politics, 2nd ed. Guilford, CT: The Dushkin Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Miroff, Bruce, Seidelman, Raymond, and Swanstrom, Todd. 1995. Democratic Debate: An Introduction to American Politics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Karen and Sabato, Larry. 1995. American Government, Roots and Reform, 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Peirce, Neal R. 1968. The People's President: The Electoral College in American History and the Direct-Vote Alternative. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Steffen W., Shelley, Mack C. II, and Bardes, Barbara A.. 1995. American Government and Politics Today. Saint Paul/Minneapolis: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Wayne, Stephen J., Mackenzie, G. Calvin, O'Brien, David M., and Cole, Richard L. 1995. The Politics of American Government: Foundations, Participation, Institutions, and Policy. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, Gruhl, John, Steinman, Michael, Comer, John, and Rigdon, Susan M.. 1996. American Government, 6th ed. Minneapolis/St. Paul: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. and Dilulio, John J. Jr., 1995. American Government: Institutions and Policies, 6th ed. Lexington, MA: DC Heath and Company.Google Scholar