Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:26:15.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democracy, Dictatorship, and the Making of Modern Political Science: Huntington's Thesis and Pinochet's Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2006

Jorge Heine
Jorge Heine
Affiliation:
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Chile
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his 1987 presidential address to the American Political Science Association,” One Soul at a Time: Political Science and Political Reform,” Samuel P. Huntington (1988, 3–10) argued at some length that “political science … is not just an intellectual discipline (but) also a moral one,” and that “the impetus to do good in the sense of promoting political reform is … embedded in our profession.” Therefore, “it is impossible to have political scientists in the absence of political participation, and political science has only developed with the expansion of political participation. In a society in which there is no participation—no competition for power—political scientists would have nothing to do.” It logically follows that “the connection between democracy has been a close and continuing one.”

Type
FEATURES
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 273 - 280
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, David. 2005. “La institucionalización de la ciencia política en Chile y América Latina: una mirada desde el Sur.” Revista de Ciencia Política 25 (1): 3–15.Google Scholar
Angell, Alan, and Susan Carstairs. 1987. “The Exile Question in Chilean Politics.” Third World Quarterly 9.Google Scholar
Barrios, Alicia, and José Joaquín Brunner. 1988. La Sociología en Chile: Instituciones y practicantes. Santiago: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Brunner, José Joaquín. 1988. El caso de la Sociología en Chile:Fformación de una disciplina. Santiago: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Brunner, José Joaquín, and Alicia Barrios. 1987. Inquisición, mercado y filantropía: Ciencias Sociales y autoritarismo en Argentina, Brasil, Chile y Uruguay. Santiago: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Constable, Pamela, and Arturo Valenzuela. 1988. “Plebiscite in Chile: End of the Pinochet Era?” Current History 87.Google Scholar
Fernández, María de los Angeles. 2003. “Twenty Years of the Chilean Political Science Association.” Participation: Bulletin of the International Political Science Association 27 (winter): 21–22.Google Scholar
Fernández, María de los Angeles. 1997. “Los meandros de un saber: Sobre el origen, desarrollo y perspectivas de la Ciencia Política en Chile.” M.A. thesis, Institute of Political Science, Catholic University of Chile.Google Scholar
Flisfisch, Angel. 1991. La política como compromiso democrático. Madrid: Siglo XX.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Claudio, and Graciela Santana. 2005. “El ‘boom’ de la ciencia política en Chile: escuelas, mercado y tendencias.” Revista de Ciencia Política 25 (1): 16–39.Google Scholar
Fuenzalida, Edmundo. 1983. “The Reception of ‘Scientific Sociology’ in Chile.” Latin American Research Review 18 (2).Google Scholar
Garcés, Joan. 1990. Allende y la experiencia chilena: Las armas de la política. Santiago: BAT.Google Scholar
Garcés, Joan. 1974. El Estado y los problemas tácticos en el gobierno de Allende. Madrid: Siglo XX.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 2000. La sociedad en que viviremos: Introducción sociológica al cambio de siglo. Santiago: LOM.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1995. Hacia una nueva era política: Estudio sobre las democratizaciones. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1989. “La evolución de las Ciencias Sociales en Chile y su internacionalización.” Documento de Trabajo FLACSO # 432. Santiago.Google Scholar
Heine, Jorge. 2002. “PNUD. Desarrollo Humano en Chile 2002. Nosotros los chilenos: un desafío cultural.” Perspectivas en política, economía y gestión (Santiago) 6 (1): 165–173.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Carlos. 2000. El régimen de Pinochet. Santiago: Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Carlos. 1983. “Se establecerá definitivamente la Ciencia Política en América Latina? Propuestas para una respuesta afirmativa.” Alternativas 1: 15–37.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1988. “One Soul at a Time: Political Science and Political Reform.” American Political Science Review 82 (March): 3–10.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Marcos. 1970. La Ciencia Política latinomericana en la encrucijada. Santiago: Universitaria.Google Scholar
Lagos, Ricardo. 2005. The Twenty First Century: A View from the South. With a foreword by Tony Blair. London: First.Google Scholar
Lechner, Norbert. 1990. “Las condiciones políticas de la Ciencia Política en Chile.” Documento de Trabajo, FLACSO # 453. Santiago.Google Scholar
Lladser, María Teresa. 1988. La investigación en Ciencias Sociales en Chile: Su desarrollo en los centros privados, 1973–1988. Santiago: Taller de Cooperación al Desarrollo.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore, personal communication, June 2003Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 1992. “The State of Political Science: How We Became What We Study.” American Political Science Review 86 (March): 1–7.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, Philippe Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead, eds. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Puryear, Jeffrey. 1994. Thinking Politics: Intellectuals and Democracy in Chile, 1973–1988. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rehren, Alfredo, and Marco Fernández. 2005. “La evolución de la ciancia política en Chile: un análisis exploratorio.” Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago) 25 (1): 40–55.Google Scholar
Tomassini, Luciano. 1996. “Evolución de la Ciencia Política en Chile.” Política 34 (fall): 103–133.Google Scholar
UNDP. 1998. Desarrollo Humano en Chile-1998: Las paradojas de la modernización. Santiago: UNDP.Google Scholar
UNDP. 2000. Desarrollo Humano en Chile 2000: Mas sociedad para gobernar el futuro. Santiago: UNDP.Google Scholar
UNDP. 2002. Desarrollo Humano en Chile 2002: Nosotros los chilenos, un desafío cultural. Santiago: UNDP.Google Scholar
UNDP. 2004. Desarrollo Humano en Chile 2004: El poder para qué y para quién? Santiago: UNDP.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo, and Samuel Valenzuela, eds. 1986. Military Rule in Chile : Dictatorship and Opposition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo, and Samuel Valenzuela, eds. 1972. Chile: Politics and Society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Chile. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1977. Political Brokers in Chile: Local Government in a Centralized Polity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo, Mark Falcoff, and Susan Kaufman Purcell. 1988. Chile: Prospects for Democracy. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo, and Pamela Constable. 1991. A Nation of Enemies: Chile under Pinochet. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Varas, Augusto, and Claudio Fuentes. 1994. Defensa Nacional, Chile 1990–1994: Modernización y desarrollo. Santiago: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Varas, Augusto, Felipe Agüero, and Fernando Bustamante. 1980. Chile, democracia, Fuerzas Armadas. Santiago: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Walker, Ignacio. 1990. Socialismo y democracia: Chile y Europa en perspectiva comparada. Santiago: CIEPLAN-Hachette.Google Scholar