Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:33:40.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does the Wording of Syllabi Affect Student Course Assessment in Introductory Political Science Classes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2002

John T. Ishiyama  and
Stephen Hartlaub
John T. Ishiyama
Affiliation:
Truman State University
Stephen Hartlaub
Affiliation:
Frostburg State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we examine the impact of syllabi wording on how students assess a hypothetical instructor for an introductory political science course at a medium-sized state institution. Student participants were recruited from political science classes at this institution and randomly assigned to two groups. The groups were asked to review a sample syllabus from an introductory political science class and answer a number of questions regarding the instructor, as well as a few demographic questions. The syllabi were identical except for the wording of the requirements. For one group, the requirements were expressed in “rewarding” terms; for the other, the requirements were expressed in “punishing” terms.

Type
THE TEACHER
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , September 2002 , pp. 567 - 570
Copyright
© 2002 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House-Hilton, April 19–22, 2001. Chicago, Illinois.