Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:03:26.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Democratic Transition? The 1997 Mexican Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Joseph L. Klesner*
Affiliation:
Kenyon College

Extract

Mexico's 1997 midterm elections promise to democratize Mexico's autocratic and centralized presidentialist regime and thereby change Mexican politics profoundly. The electoral blow dealt the Institutional Revolutionary Party (Partido Revolucionario Institucional, or PRI) by voters on July 6 brings an elected mayor to the world's largest city, places more non-PRI governors into Mexican state houses assuring that demands for decentralization will intensify, and takes from President Ernesto Zedillo the congressional basis for the six-year dictatorship that the Mexican presidency has been since the 1930s. Surely the struggle for democracy in Mexico is not over, but a critical battle has been won by democrats of all ideological persuasions. Zedillo himself claimed, in an address to the nation made shortly after the preliminary electoral figures appeared on election night, to be pleased by the progress made by his nation, saying that the day had been a “great democratic fiesta” (Zedillo 1997, 7).

Unlike most elections, the critical issues facing Mexican voters in 1997 had little to do with public policy. Although Mexico is a dozen years into a neoliberal economic restructuring program that has had great consequences for the distribution of income, for the number of Mexicans living in poverty, and for the penetration of foreign capital, goods, and services into the Mexican economy (see Otero 1996), neoliberalism was only peripherally an issue in this election. Both major parties of opposition campaigned on the issue of tax relief, specifically promising to lower Mexico's value added tax from 15% to 10% (Mayolo and Luna 1997, A1; Chacón Albarrán 1997).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albarrán de Alba, Gerardo. 1997. “El Fantasma del Fraude Satura de Candados un Proceso Electoral en el que no Hay Confianza.” Proceso, no. 1078, June 28. (Available online at http://www.proceso.com.mx/1078/1078n09.html).Google Scholar
Alocer, V. Jorge, ed. 1995. Eleclones, Dialogo, y Reforma: Mexico, 1994. Vol. 1. Mexico City: Nuevo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Anderson, John Ward. 1997. “Defections, Coalitions, Comebacks.” Washington Post, July 9, A12.Google Scholar
Camacho Guzmán, Oscar, and Chim, Lorenzo. 1997. “Participatión de entre 70 y 75% en comicios de Campeche.” La Jornada, July 7, 11.Google Scholar
Castañneda, Jorge G. 1997. “Falacias Partidarias.” Proceso, no. 1078, June 28. (Available online at http://www.proceso.com.mx/1078/1078n21.html).Google Scholar
Chacón Albarrán, Martín. 1997. “Reducir el IVA, sólo parte de la Reforma que Impulsa PRD.” El Nacional, July 22.Google Scholar
Chávez, Elías. 1997. “Durante la Campañna, Zedillo Supeditó su Proyecto de País a la Obtencion de la Mayoria Prriísta.” Proceso, no. 1080. July 12. (Available online at http://www.pmceso.com.mx/1080/1080n10.html).Google Scholar
Correa, Guillermo. 1997. “Alberto Anaya, del PT, Contra las Especulaciones: No Hay Posibilidad de una Alianza con el PRI.” Proceso, no. 1080, July 12. (Available online at http://www.proceso.com.mex.mx/1080/1080n04.html).Google Scholar
Davis, Diane E. 1994. Urban Leviathan: Mexico City in the Twentieth Century. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Giménez, Rafael, and Romero, Vidal. 1997. “Avala Ciudadania Eleción.” Reforma, July 8, B4.Google Scholar
González Cassanova, Pablo. 1970. Democracy in Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
González, Roura, Felipe, Dieter Nohlen, and Zavatto, Daniel. 1997. Análisis del Sistema Electoral Mexicano: Informe de un Grupo de Expertos. Mexico City: United Nations Program for Development.Google Scholar
Guadarrama, S. Graciela. 1987. “Entrepreneurs and Politics: Businessmen and Electoral Contests in Sonora and Nuevo León, July 1985.” In Electoral Patterns and Perspectives in Mexico, ed. Alvarado, Arturo. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, Jorge Arturo. 1996. “Denuncia Camacho Represalia de Zedillo.” Reforma, August 1, A1.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, Jorge Arturo. 1997. “Capta Cárdenas 47.11% de votos.” Reforma July 12, B1.Google Scholar
Iliff, Laurence. 1997. “Zedillo Reaching Out to Opposition.” Dallas Morning News, July 18.Google Scholar
Instituto Federal Electoral. 1997. The Mexican Federal System and the Federal Election. Mexico City: IFE.Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph L. 1994. “Realignment or Dealignment? Consequences of Economic Crisis and Restructuring for the Mexican Party System.” In Politics of Economic Restructuring: State-Society Relations and Regime Change in Mexico, ed. Cook, Maria Lorena, Middlebrook, Kevin, and Molinar, Juan. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph L. 1995. “The 1994 Mexican Elections: Manifestations of a Divided Society?Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos, 11(1): 137–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayolo, Fernando, and Juárez, Miguel A.. 1997. “Declina PAN Autocritica.” Reforma, July 9, B1.Google Scholar
Mayolo, Fernando, and Luna, Claudia. 1997. “Negociará PAN Reducir el IVA.” Reforma, July 10, A1.Google Scholar
Migueles, Rubén. 1997. “Sera' el DF un Gran Reto.” Reforma, July 7, B1.Google Scholar
Morito, Martín. 1997. “En Campeche, Priístas y Perredistas Predicen: Habrá Violencia Poselectoral.” Proceso, no. 1078, June 28. (Available online at http://www.proceso.com.mx/1078/1078n02.html).Google Scholar
Otero, Gerardo, ed. 1996. Neoliberalism Revisited: Economic Restructuring and Mexico's Political Political Future. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Preston, Julia. 1997. “Mexico in Flux as Ruling Party Faces Big Losses.” New York Times, July 2.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Rosa Icela. 1997. “Trabajo de Tiempo Completo en la Cámara, Demanda el PRD a sus Diputados Electos.” La Jornada, July 16. (Available online at http://serpiente.dgsca.unam./mx./jornada/1997/jul97/970716/obrador.html).Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria E., and Ward, Peter M. 1992. Policymaking, Politics, and Urban Governance in Chihuahua: The Experience of Recent Panista Governments. Austin: LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria E., eds. 1995. Opposition Government in Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Sánchez Gutiérrez, Arturo. 1995. “Las Campanas Electorales.” In La Vox de los Votos: Un Análisis Critico de las Elecciones de 1994, ed. Castillo, Germán Pérez Fernándes, Arturo, Alvarado M., and Gutiérrez, Arturo Sánchez. Mexico City: Miguel Angel Porrúa.Google Scholar
Secretaría Nacional de Asuntos Electorales, Partido Actión Nacional. 1997. Estadísticas de las Elecciónes Locales y de la Eleccion Federal 1997 del 6 de Julio de 1997. Mexico City: PAN.Google Scholar
Schiller, Dane. 1997. “PAN, PRI in Close Fight in Nuevo León.” San Antonio Express-News, June 29, A12.Google Scholar
Sotelo, Patricia. 1997. “Somos Primera Fuerza-Roque.” Reforma, July 7, A10.Google Scholar
Teherán, Jorge. 1997. “Piden Exlideres Revisión del PRI.” Reforma, July 10, A1.Google Scholar
Vargas, Rosa Elvira. 1997. “Zedillo: Cambio en el PRI o el Será Arollada.” La Jornada, July 16. (Available online at http://serpiente.dgsca.unam.mx/jornada/1997/jul97/970716/zedillo.html).Google Scholar
Zedillo Ponce de León, Ernesto. 1997. “La Vocatión Civica de los Mexicanos, honorada y Fortalecida.” El Nacional, July 7, 3.Google Scholar