Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-xl4lj Total loading time: 0.508 Render date: 2021-06-14T04:00:28.707Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

The 2016 Ithiel de Sola Pool Lecture: Interdependence, Communication, and Aggregation: Transforming Voters into Electorates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2017

Robert Huckfeldt
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Image of the first page of this article. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.
Type
Special to PS
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Achen, Christopher H. and Phillips Shively, W.. 1995. Cross Level Inference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ahn, T. K., Huckfeldt, Robert, and Ryan, John B.. 2014. Experts, Activists, and Democratic Politics: Are Electorates Self-Educating? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asch, Solomon E. 1955. “Opinions and Social Pressure.” Scientific American 193 (5): 3135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. “The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (2): 203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, Bill, with Cushing, Robert G.. 2008. The Big Sort. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, David and Stokes, Donald E.. 1969. Political Change in Britain. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1964. An Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, D. E., 206–61. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1969. “Of Time and Partisan Stability.” Comparative Political Studies 2 (2): 139–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael S. and Keeter, Scott. 1993. “Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 179206.Google Scholar
Dogan, Mattei and Rokkan, Stein, eds. 1974. Social Ecology. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1951 (1897). Suicide. Trans. Spaulding, J. A. and Simpson, G.. London: Routledge.Google ScholarPubMed
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, Ernst and Gächter, Simon. 2002. “Altruistic Punishment in Humans.” Nature 415: 137140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, David A. 1999. “Ecological Inference and the Ecological Fallacy.” International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences 6: 4027–30.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. 2010. Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Expanded Edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Leo. 1953. “Ecological Regressions and the Behavior of Individuals.” American Sociological Review 18: 663–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1978. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (6): 1420–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heberle, Rudolf. 1943a. “The Political Movements Among the Rural People in Schleswig-Holstein, 1918 to 1932, I,” Journal of Politics 5: 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heberle, Rudolf. 1943b. “The Political Movements Among the Rural People in Schleswig-Holstein, 1918 to 1932, II,” Journal of Politics 5: 115–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 1983. “Social Contexts, Social Networks, and Urban Neighborhoods: Environmental Constraints on Friendship Choice.” The American Journal of Sociology 89 (3): 651–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 2001. “The Social Communication of Political Expertise.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 425–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Ikeda, Ken’ichi, and Pappi, Franz Urban. 2005. “Patterns of Disagreement in Democratic Politics: Comparing Germany, Japan, and the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 497514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, Paul E., and Sprague, John. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Levine, Jeffrey, Morgan, William, and Sprague, John. 1999. “Accessibility and the Political Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 888911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert and Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse. 2008. “Moths, Flames, and Political Engagement: Managing Disagreement within Communication Networks.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 8396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Pietryka, Matthew T., and Reilly, Jack. 2014. “Noise, Bias, and Expertise in Political Communication Networks.” Social Networks 36: 110–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Sprague, John, and Levine, Jeffrey. 2000. “The Dynamics of Collective Deliberation in the 1996 Election: Campaign Effects on Accessibility, Certainty, and Accuracy.” American Political Science Review 94 (3): 641651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Paul and Huckfeldt, Robert. 2005. “Agent Based Explanations for the Survival of Disagreement in Social Networks.” In Zuckerman, Alan S., ed. The Social Logic of Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 251268.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O. 1973. Bonds of Pluralism. New York: Wiley Google Scholar
Lazer, David, Rubineau, Brian, Chetkovich, Carol, Katz, Nancy, and Neblo, Michael. 2010. “The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes.” Political Communication 27 (3): 248–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. 1968 (1944). The People’s Choice: How a Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton and Taber, Charles S.. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D. and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1990. “A Decade of Experimental Research on Spatial Models of Elections and Committees.” In Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting, ed. Hinich, Melvin J. and Enelow, James M., 99144. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, J. Miller and Smith-Lovin, Lynn. 1987. “Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-Face Groups.” American Sociological Review 52 (3): 370–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1956. “One-Party Politics and the Voter Revisited.” American Political Science Review 50: 707725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (1): 4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietryka, Matthew T., Reilly, Jack, Maliniak, Daniel M., Miller, Patrick, Huckfeldt, Robert, and Rapoport, Ronald. 2016. “From Respondents to Networks: Bridging between Individuals, Discussants, and the Networks in the Study of Political Discussion.” Working Paper.
Przeworski, Adam. 1974. “Contextual Models of Political Behavior.” Political Methodology 1: 27–61.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. 1950. “Ecological Correlations and the Behaviour of Individuals.” American Sociological Review 15 (3): 351–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Lee, Bierbauer, Gunter, and Hoffman, Susan. 1976. “The Role of Attribution Processes in Conformity and Dissent.” American Psychologist 31 (2): 148–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, John Barry. 2011. “Accuracy and Bias in Perceptions of Political Knowledge.” Political Behavior 33 (2): 335–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Hyunjin and Eveland, William P.. 2015. “The Structure of Communication Networks Matters: How Network Diversity, Centrality, and Context Influence Political Ambivalence, Participation, and Knowledge.” Political Communication 32 (1): 83108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, John. 1976. “Estimating a Boudon Type Contextual Model: Some Practical and Theoretical Problems of Measurement.” Political Methodology 3: 333–53.Google Scholar
Tingsten, Herbert. 1963. Political Behavior: Studies in Election Statistics. Translated by Hammarling, V.. Totowa, N.J.: Bedminster. Originally published in 1937.Google Scholar
Watts, Duncan J. 1999. “Networks, Dynamics and the Small World Phenomenon.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (2): 493527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. 1976. “Community Structure and Voting in the South.” Public Opinion Quarterly 40 (2): 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The 2016 Ithiel de Sola Pool Lecture: Interdependence, Communication, and Aggregation: Transforming Voters into Electorates
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The 2016 Ithiel de Sola Pool Lecture: Interdependence, Communication, and Aggregation: Transforming Voters into Electorates
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The 2016 Ithiel de Sola Pool Lecture: Interdependence, Communication, and Aggregation: Transforming Voters into Electorates
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *