Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-29T23:54:44.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relative implications of ozone formation both in the stratosphere and the troposphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

A. R. Wellburn
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Sciences, Institute of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK
N. D. Paul
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Sciences, Institute of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK
H. Mehlhorn
Affiliation:
Institut für Angewandte Botanik, Universität Essen - FB 94, Henry Dunant Straße 65, 4300 Essen 1, Germany
Get access

Synopsis

Although ozone (O3) occurs in both the troposphere and the stratosphere, mechanisms of O3 formation and removal in both regions of the atmosphere are very different. Moreover, the presence of O3 in the two layers has very different implications for the biosphere, especially vegetation. This introductory paper gives an overall appreciation of the two pools of O3 and their relative influences upon plant life. In the troposphere, natural and unburnt hydrocarbons (HCs) not only participate in the formation of atmospheric O3 but are also involved in the formation of free radicals from O3 which go on to injure plant tissues. In the stratosphere, O3 absorbs significant amounts of ultraviolet radiation (285-315 nm, UV-B) from sunlight which would otherwise harm biological systems. Depletion of stratospheric O3 by chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) has prompted urgent studies to assess the consequences of enhanced UV-B radiation on vegetation. Preliminary assessments of possible changes to UK crops are described in this paper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alscher, R. G. & dimming, J. R. 1990. Stress responses in plants: adaptation and acclimation mechanisms. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.Google Scholar
Cape, J. N., Smith, R. I. & Fowler, D. 1994. The influence of ozone chemistry and meteorology on plant exposure to photo-oxidants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 102B, 1131.Google Scholar
Chameides, W. L. 1989. The chemistry of ozone deposition to plant leaves: Role of ascorbic acid. Environmental Science & Technology 23, 595600.Google Scholar
Craker, L. E. 1971. Ethylene production from ozone injured plants. Environmental Pollution 1, 299304.Google Scholar
Ehhalt, D. H., Dorn, H-P. & Poppe, D. 1991. The chemistry of the hydroxyl radical in the atmosphere. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 97B, 1734.Google Scholar
Grimes, H. D., Perkins, K. K. & Boss, W. F. 1983. Ozone degrades into hydroxyl radical under physiological conditions. A spin trapping study. Plant Physiology 72, 1016–20.Google Scholar
Haluk, J. P., Kimmel, F. & Metch, M. 1986. Delignication du bois de peuplier par ozonolyse en milieu aqueux. Holzforschung 40, 237–48.Google Scholar
Heath, R. L. 1980. Initial events in injury to plant by air pollutants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31, 395431.Google Scholar
Heath, R. L. 1984. Air pollutant effects on biochemicals derived from metabolism: organic, fatty and amino acids. In Koziol, M. J. & Whately, F. R. (Eds) Gaseous air pollutants and plant metabolism, London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Heath, R. L. 1987. The biochemistry of ozone attack on the plasma membrane of plant cells. Advances in Phytochemistry 21, 2954.Google Scholar
Heath, R. L. 1988. Biochemical mechanisms of pollutant stress. In Heck, W. W., Taylor, O. C. & Tingey, D. T. (Eds), Assessment of crop loss from air pollutants, pp. 259–86. Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
Hewitt, C. N., Kok, G. L. & Fall, R. 1990. Hydroperoxides in plants exposed to ozone mediate air pollution damage to alkene emitters. Nature 344, 56–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, C. A., Shameti, L., Kuppers, K. & Mehlhorn, H. 1994. Formic acid production as evidence of ethylene-derived free radical formation in mung beans treated with ozone. Plant Physiology (in press).Google Scholar
Kimmerer, T. W. & Kozlowski, T. T. 1982. Ethylene, ethane, acetaldehyde and ethanol production by plants under stress. Plant Physiology 69, 840–7.Google Scholar
Krupa, S. V. & Kickert, R. N. 1989. The greenhouse effect: Impacts of ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation, carbon dioxide (CO2), and ozone (O3) on vegetation. Environmental Pollution 61, 263393.Google Scholar
Langebartels, C., Kerner, K., Leonardi, S., Schraundner, M., Trost, M., Heller, W. & Sandermann, J. Jr 1991. Biochemical plant responses to ozone. I. Different induction of polyamine and ethene biosynthesis in tobacco. Plant Physiology 95, 882–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mader, P. P., Cann, G. & Palmer, L. 1955. Effect of polluted atmospheres on organic acid composition in plant tissues. Plant Physiology 30, 318–23.Google Scholar
Mehlhorn, H. 1990. Ethene-promoted ascorbate peroxidase activity protects plants against hydrogen peroxide, ozone and paraquat. Plant, Cell & Environment 13, 971–6.Google Scholar
Mehlhorn, H. & Wellburn, A. R. 1987. Stress ethylene formation determines plant sensitivity to ozone. Nature 327, 417–18.Google Scholar
Mehlhorn, H., Francis, B. J. & Wellburn, A. R. 1988. Prediction of forest decline damage to Norway spruce using three simple site-independent diagnostic parameters. New Phytologist 110, 525–34.Google Scholar
Mehlhorn, H., Tabner, B. J. & Wellburn, A. R. 1990. Electron spin resonance evidence for the formation of free radicals in plants exposed to ozone. Physiol. Plantarum 79, 377–83.Google Scholar
Mehlhorn, H., O'Shea, J. M. & Wellburn, A. R. 1991. Atmospheric ozone interacts with stress ethylene formation by plants to cause visible leaf injury. Journal of Experimental Botany 42, 1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehlhorn, H., Shameti, L. & Jones, C. A. 1994. Formation of ethylene and formic acid and levels of formic acid dehydrogenase activity in two different pea varieties treated with ozone. Plant Physiology (in press).Google Scholar
Mudd, J. B. 1982. Effects of oxidants on metabolic function. In Unsworth, M. H. & Ormrod, D. P. (Eds), Effects of gaseous air pollution in agriculture and horticulture, pp. 189203. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Pallaghy, C. K. & Raschke, K. 1972. No stomatal response to ethylene. Plant Physiology 49, 275276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pauls, K. P. & Thompson, J. E. 1981. Effects of in vitro treatment with ozone on the physical and chemical properties of membranes. Physiologia Plantarum 53, 255–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, L. & Hewitt, C. N. 1992. Ozone-hydrocarbon interactions in plants. Phytochemistry 31, 4045–50.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. E. Jr & Gunderson, C. A. 1988. Action of ozone on foliar gas exchange in Glycine max L. Merr: a potential role for endogenous ethylene. New Phytologist 110, 301–7.Google Scholar
Tingey, D. T., Fites, R. C. & Wickliff, C. 1976a. Activity changes in selected enzymes from soybean leaves following ozone exposure. Physiologia Plantarum 33, 316–20.Google Scholar
Tingey, D. T., Wilhour, R. G. & Standley, C. 1976b. The effect of chronic ozone exposures on the metabolite content of Ponderosa pine seedlings. Forest Science 22, 234–41.Google Scholar
Tingey, D. T., Standley, C. & Field, R. W. 1976c. Stress ethylene evolution: A measure of ozone effects on plants. Atmospheric Environment 10, 969–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treshow, M. 1984. Air pollution and plant life. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Ltd.Google Scholar
UNEP Environmental Effects Panel Report. 1989. Environmental effects of ozone depletion. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNEP Environmental Eflfects Panel Report. 1991. Environmental Effects of Ozone Depletion (Update). Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations.Google Scholar
Wellburn, A. R. 1988. Air pollution and acid rain: the biological impact. Harlow: Longman Scientific & Technical.Google Scholar
Zilinskas, B. A., Greenhalgh-Weidman, B. & Brennan, E. 1990. The relationship between EDU pre-treatment and C2H4 evolution in ozonated pea plants. Environmental Pollution 65, 241–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed