Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-xdx58 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-14T04:58:38.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Native or introduced? Problems in the taxonomy and plant geography of some widely introduced annual brome-grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

P. M. Smith
P. M. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JH, Scotland
Get access

Synopsis

Weedy nature and critical taxonomic status of widespread autogamous annual brome-grasses combine to make assessments of their native phytogeographical areas uncertain or impossible. Suggested criteria for determining native status are reviewed. Some species found in SW Asia occur also in Europe. Some others are so far known only in Europe and may either be native there or introduced from SW Asia. These possibilities are considered by applying native status criteria to 10 principal exemplar species and 4 subspecies. On the basis of known distributions, these criteria suggest that: (i) some species are not native in any primary habitats, and perhaps never have been; (ii) though SW Asia seems to be the centre from which the current adaptive radiation of Bromus L. annuals began, not all its brome-grass flora is native, and some of its probable native species are known only as introduced plants in Europe i.e. are undiscovered in SW Asia. It is urged that our imperfect knowledge of distributions in this critical group be remedied by careful analysis of the brome-grass flora of primary habitats in SW Asia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 89: Plant Life of South-West Asia , 1986 , pp. 273 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, H. G. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic 5, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbaek, H. 1953. Early crops in Southern England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 18, 194–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerguélen, M. 1983. Les Graminées de France au travers de “Flora Europaea” et de la “Flore” du C.N.R.S Lejeunia; revue de Botanique n.s. 110, 1–79.Google Scholar
Parsons., P. A. 1983. The Evolutionary Biology of Colonising Species. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, E. J. 1961. Weeds and Aliens. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Scholz, H. 1972. Bromus brachystachys Hornung und Br. pseudobrachystachys H. Scholz spec. nov. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 91, 462–469.Google Scholar
Scholz, H., 1981. Bromus oostachys Bornm. (Gramineae)—erneute Untersuchung des Typusexamplars. Willdenowia 11, 115–119.Google Scholar
Smith, P. M. 1968a. The Bromus mollis aggregate in Britain. Watsonia 6, 327–344.Google Scholar
Smith, P. M. 1968b. Serological distinctness of B. pseudosecalinus P. Smith sp. nov. Feddes Repertorium 11, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. M., 1972. Serology and species relationships in annual bromes (Bromus L. sect. Bromus). Annals of Botany 36, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. M., 1973. Observations on some critical brome-grasses. Watsonia 9, 319–332.Google Scholar
Smith, P. M., 1983. Proteins mimicry and microevolution in grasses. In Proteins and Nucleic Acids in Plant Systematics, ed. Jensen, U. and Fairbrothers, D. E., pp. 311–323. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbins, G. L. 1981. Chromosomes and evolution in the genus Bromus (Gramineae). Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 102, 359–379.Google Scholar
Tournay, R. 1968. Le brome des Ardennes, Bromus arduennensis, et ses proches B. secalinus et B. grossus. Bulletin du Jardin botanique national de Belgique 38, 295–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, D. A. 1985. What are the criteria for presuming native status? Watsonia 15, 231–236.Google Scholar