Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T14:08:01.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bioenergetics of Tufted Duck (Aythya fuligula) at Loch Leven, Kinross

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

K. F. Laughlin
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Stirling.
Get access

Synopsis

The tufted duck was chosen as the subject of an energy study at Loch Leven because it is a diving duck which feeds mainly from within the loch and it is present throughout the year, about 500 to 600 pairs nest annually.

Using data from population counts, breeding biology and feeding studies and the analysis of body and egg composition an energy budget for the population has been computed. The values for respiration, R, are calculated on the basis that ‘existence energy’ requirements are 2·5 × Standard Metabolic Rate. Values for rejecta assume an assimilation efficiency of 75 per cent.

The figures have been presented on a monthly basis as there are wide fluctuations in population size, and therefore energy demand during the year and between years. In 1970 very large numbers of tufted ducks were present on the loch during autumn. The additional demands of these birds over 4 months represent an increase in the annual energy requirements of almost 50 per cent.

Chironomid larvae account for 60 per cent of the food of the tufted ducks at Loch Leven; other important food items are caddis larvae and molluscs (mainly Valvata spp.).

Expressed on a /m2 basis and over a full year the energy demands of the tufted ducks represent a small proportion of the total energy available at Loch Leven. However, water depth and the depth of the food in the substrate reduce the actual availability of the food and probably reduce the usable feeding area to 20 per cent of the total loch area.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Allison, G. A. and Newton, I., 1974. Waterfowl at Loch Leven, Kinross. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 365381.Google Scholar
Brisbin, I. L., 1969. Bioenergetics of the breeding cycle of the Ring Dove. Auk, 86, 5474.Google Scholar
Charles, W. N., East, K., Gray, M. C. and Murray, T. D., 1974. The production of larval Chironomidae in the mud at Loch Leven, Kinross. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 241258.Google Scholar
Lasiewski, R. C. and Dawson, W. R., 1967. A re-examination of the relation between standard metabolic rate and body weight in birds. Condor, 69, 1323.Google Scholar
Laughlin, K. F., 1973. The bioenergetics of the Tufted Duck (Aythya fuligula). Thesis. Stirling Univ.Google Scholar
Maitland, P. S. and Hudspith, P. M. G., 1974. The Zoobenthos of Loch Leven, Kinross and estimates of its production in the sandy littoral area during 1970 and 1971. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 219239.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. I. G., 1974. The energy requirements of trout and perch populations in Loch Leven, Kinross. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 333345.Google ScholarPubMed
Owen, R. B., 1970. The bioenergetics of captive Blue-winged Teal under controlled and outdoor conditions. Condor, 72, 153163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penny, J. G. and Bailey, E. D., 1970. Comparison of energy requirements of fledgling Black ducks and American coots. J. Wildl. Mgmt, 34, 105114.Google Scholar
Pollard, D. W., 1967. Techniques for the rapid extraction of ingested food from wildfowl viscera. A. Rep. Wildfowl Trust, 18, 156157.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. D., 1965. Energy intake of the Mourning Dove, Zenaidura macroura marginella. Science, N.Y., 150, 11711172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, G. C., 1968. Bioenergetics of the captive Willow Ptarmigan under natural conditions. Ecology, 49, 10351045.Google Scholar
Yarker, B. and Atkinson-Willes, G. L., 1971. The numerical distribution of some British breeding ducks. Wildfowl, 22, 6370.Google Scholar