No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 May 2014
In her useful paper on Late Bronze Age razors Mrs Piggott has designated as Class II the bifid razors. For these she suggests dates ranging from about 750 B.C. to about 400 B.C. Without wishing to dispute these dates for the British examples—indeed the date of about 400 B.C. for the one from All Cannings Cross cannot be altered by much—I would suggest that such razors may have been in use some time previously if not in Britain then on the western Continent.
It has been a commonly accepted view that these razors are of Sicilian origin. Sicilian tombs of the centuries before the foundation of the Greek colonies have produced a variety of razors (fig. i) and probably there is some ultimate connexion between these and bronze razors elsewhere. But the one from Cassibile that is considered to be the link between the western bifid razors and Sicily seems to be a unique feature in the island. At least I have not encountered another in the archaeological literature of Sicily, and on a recent visit to Syracuse, Dr Bernabò Brea assured me that he did not know of another Sicilian example. Hence one is inclined to suppose that the bifid razor from Cassibile is not really a Sicilian type at all but a western import. Consequently such clues as can be discovered to its date in Sicily—and these point to the vicinity of the 10th and 9th centuries B.C.—indicate at least a time when such razors were in existence somewhere in western Europe.
page 160 note 1 Piggott, M. C., ‘Late Bronze Age Razors in the British Isles’, Proc. Prehist, Soc., 1946, 121Google Scholar.
page 160 note 2 Montelius, , Die Vorklassiche Chronologie Italiens, Text (Stockholm, 1912), p. 194Google Scholar.
page 160 note 3 See Dunbabin, T. J.'s interpretation of the evidence in The Western Greeks (Oxford, 1948)Google Scholar.
page 160 note 4 Brea, L. Bernabô, ‘Civiltá preistorische delle isole eolie’, Archivo de Prehistoria Levantina, III, 1952, p. 69 fGoogle Scholar. But the excavations have proceeded further since that article was written and Bernabò Brea's views have been slightly modified. See his ‘La Sicilia prehistórica’, Escuela Española de Roma, Serie arqueológica, I, 1954, 191, 212Google Scholar.
page 161 note 1 Giglioli, G. Q., ‘Tomba laziale di S. Lorenzo Vecchio’. Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana, N.S., vol. 4, 1940, 177 (pot not figured)Google Scholar.
page 161 note 2 Montelius, , Civilization primitive en Italie, vol. 2. Stockholm, 1904, pl. 136, 13Google Scholar.
page 162 note 1 Loud, Gordon, Megiddo, 11 (Chicago, 1948), 5, 45, pl. 223, 78Google Scholar; Gjerstad, E., The Swedish Cyprus Expedition, IV 2 (Stockholm, 1948), 421Google Scholar.
page 162 note 2 Orsi, P., Monumenti Antichi, 1899, p. 129Google Scholar.